PDA

View Full Version : tenon and recess fail !!



smiife
12th October 2016, 08:04 PM
Hi guys,
I wanted to make a bowl with carved feet, so I started a bowl with a recess, all was going well and then bang, fail !!!!!!!
O. K. ?...forget the feet , I will just put on a tenon and reshape
and go from there, ..........I thought, but no another fail !!!!!!:o
The same bowl both chucking points broken , and the bowl
went in to orbit not once ,, but twice , couldn, t believe it:~
I decided to quit while I was ahead , and went and had a beer........

Kuffy
12th October 2016, 08:10 PM
Looks like it will be a great bowl when you manage to finish it, assuming it doesn't knock you out in the process

powderpost
12th October 2016, 09:00 PM
This is another reason I use a glue chuck, haven't had a failure since I started using them.

Jim

Richard Hodsdon
13th October 2016, 02:51 AM
With your tenon try using some medium superglue. It prevents any minute movement when (if) you get a catch that loosens the grip, making the next catch the bad one. It also strengthens the tenon and prevents the catch from causing minute cracks. When you have finished turning opening the chuck will break the join on three jaws and a bump with the hand will loosen the 4th jaw. I use a Oneway chuck and use superglue whenever I turn a large bowl (300mm plus)

Richard Hodsdon
13th October 2016, 02:55 AM
Forgot to add how in my earlier post. When yo have the tenon fitting well just add a bead of glue round the base and clamp the jaws closed. wait 10 min and turn. With the Oneway I clamp the jaws on the tenon and then run a bead down onto the tenon through the gap between jaws.
Works everytime for me

Dalboy
13th October 2016, 04:08 AM
I find that with a mortice that you need a larger area of foot to prevent this happening and with the tenon you could have done with a flat area around the tenon for the jaws to sit against. Hope this works


https://vimeo.com/68649135

and also


https://vimeo.com/69018287

pommyphil
13th October 2016, 06:29 AM
And maybe a set of 100mm dovetail jaws. That tennon is tiny and Camphor is a week wood. Phil

turnerted
13th October 2016, 04:04 PM
Just turn off the broke tennon, makeing the flat a bit bigger , then hotmelt glue on a new tennon . When the glue is set, true it up and away you go .
Ted

smiife
13th October 2016, 08:05 PM
This is another reason I use a glue chuck, haven't had a failure since I started using them.


Jim

Hi jim, I will try a glue chuck and see how I go
I can feel a ....."told you so".... , moment !:U



Forgot to add how in my earlier post. When yo have the tenon fitting well just add a bead of glue round the base and clamp the jaws closed. wait 10 min and turn. With the Oneway I clamp the jaws on the tenon and then run a bead down onto the tenon through the gap between jaws.
Works everytime for me


With your tenon try using some medium superglue. It prevents any minute movement when (if) you get a catch that loosens the grip, making the next catch the bad one. It also strengthens the tenon and prevents the catch from causing minute cracks. When you have finished turning opening the chuck will break the join on three jaws and a bump with the hand will loosen the 4th jaw. I use a Oneway chuck and use superglue whenever I turn a large bowl (300mm plus)

Hi richard, I have never heard of that before , do you mean
using glue on the chuck jaws !:o

smiife
13th October 2016, 08:18 PM
I find that with a mortice that you need a larger area of foot to prevent this happening and with the tenon you could have done with a flat area around the tenon for the jaws to sit against. Hope this works


https://vimeo.com/68649135

and also


https://vimeo.com/69018287

Hi derek, yeah I think a bigger tenon might be needed
I will give a try on the weekend , thanks for your thoughts:2tsup:


And maybe a set of 100mm dovetail jaws. That tennon is tiny and Camphor is a week wood. Phil

Hi phil , I don, t think I have ever had this problem
before, but I try bigger jaws , thanks mate!:;


Just turn off the broke tennon, makeing the flat a bit bigger , then hotmelt glue on a new tennon . When the glue is set, true it up and away you go .
Ted

Hi ted, thanks for your comments,i appreciate them :2tsup:

Richard Hodsdon
14th October 2016, 03:58 AM
Hi Smiife
Yes effectively I glue the jaws to the tenon. I put the glue on the tenon then seat and close the jaws on the glue , or else if the gap between the jaws is big enough run a bead down on to the tenon. It fills up any minute gaps and any excess gets squeezed out, and locks the jaws to the tenon.
When you take the bowl off you have to clean/scratch the glue off the jaws , it takes about 30 secs to do this, I use an old pen knife, Acetone will work as well. We were shown this trick by Butch Smuts one of the turners featured in the book "New masters of Woodturning"

Mobyturns
14th October 2016, 11:36 AM
Hi Smiife
Yes effectively I glue the jaws to the tenon. I put the glue on the tenon then seat and close the jaws on the glue , or else if the gap between the jaws is big enough run a bead down on to the tenon. It fills up any minute gaps and any excess gets squeezed out, and locks the jaws to the tenon.
When you take the bowl off you have to clean/scratch the glue off the jaws , it takes about 30 secs to do this, I use an old pen knife, Acetone will work as well. We were shown this trick by Butch Smuts one of the turners featured in the book "New masters of Woodturning"

A well formed and appropriately sized tenon should be strong enough. I won't be using super glue on my chuck jaws. I support the recommendations to follow Stuart Batty's tips, all sound well proven techniques.

smiife
14th October 2016, 08:06 PM
A well formed and appropriately sized tenon should be strong enough. I won't be using super glue on my chuck jaws. I support the recommendations to follow Stuart Batty's tips, all sound well proven techniques.

Hi moby, I just went back to photo of the tenon and
thought that the fit was "well formed and appropriate sized tenon "
Could you tell me what Stuart Batty, s tips are please ?
Also not sure I want to glue my jaws up either !:no:

Mobyturns
14th October 2016, 10:11 PM
Hi moby, I just went back to photo of the tenon and
thought that the fit was "well formed and appropriate sized tenon "
Could you tell me what Stuart Batty, s tips are please ?
Also not sure I want to glue my jaws up either !:no:

smiife, I had replied yesterday but some how I must not have posted the reply when I was disturbed by family.

I really can't comment on your tenon shape etc as I can't see it, only the sheared off portion. The tenon diameter is a good match to the lower end of the chuck jaws range of movement, which means that the jaws have maximum griping power and maximum surface contact.

My first thought when I saw the photos though was - its camphor laurel! The tenon size looks OK (depending on grain properties) for a bowl of that size and many turners get away with standard jaws on most woods for bowls of that size. However CL, at least the stuff we get up here, is notorious for being soft and for shearing easily, so a larger tenon diameter than normal is prudent.

When you look at photos 1 & 2 it is apparent that the bowl curvature carries right through to the start of the tenon, so there is no flat area on the base of the bowl to register against the flat front face of the chuck jaws. Stuart's videos go into quite a bit of detail about why the tenon profile must match the jaw profile, why it should not touch the bottom of the jaws, and how the small flat area on the bowl blank creates a register for the chuck.

Without the registration surface the bowl blank actually flexes and moves in the jaws while you are turning, plus if the tenon is not well matched the inner top lip of the jaws may crush into the grain starting a crack in the soft and easily sheared wood. The rest as they say is history.

A similar situation occurs when using a recess, match the jaw profile etc.

All woods can be classified as suitable for particular applications according to their varying mechanical properties, crush strength, shear strength etc, and grain features, straight, interlocking etc. Unfortunately a lot of CL is soft, has straight grain & shears easily, so if we want to use it we have to modify our techniques to make sure we have enough cross sectional area in the tenon or the donut around the mortise to resist the shear forces created when we tighten the chuck jaws.

Stuart illustrates & explains his views very well, & I go along with his school of though, so no need to repeat.

Richard Hodsdon
14th October 2016, 10:16 PM
Smiife, give superglue a try. I was skeptical like you until I tried it. The glue leaves a very fine film on the top and inner edge of the jaws, which comes off very easily. In fact it is easier to clean off the superglue than than Sanding Sealer and/or wax polish which gums up everything. And sprays everywhere when you buff it.
Richard

smiife
15th October 2016, 08:38 PM
smiife, I had replied yesterday but some how I must not have posted the reply when I was disturbed by family.

I really can't comment on your tenon shape etc as I can't see it, only the sheared off portion. The tenon diameter is a good match to the lower end of the chuck jaws range of movement, which means that the jaws have maximum griping power and maximum surface contact.

My first thought when I saw the photos though was - its camphor laurel! The tenon size looks OK (depending on grain properties) for a bowl of that size and many turners get away with standard jaws on most woods for bowls of that size. However CL, at least the stuff we get up here, is notorious for being soft and for shearing easily, so a larger tenon diameter than normal is prudent.

When you look at photos 1 & 2 it is apparent that the bowl curvature carries right through to the start of the tenon, so there is no flat area on the base of the bowl to register against the flat front face of the chuck jaws. Stuart's videos go into quite a bit of detail about why the tenon profile must match the jaw profile, why it should not touch the bottom of the jaws, and how the small flat area on the bowl blank creates a register for the chuck.

Without the registration surface the bowl blank actually flexes and moves in the jaws while you are turning, plus if the tenon is not well matched the inner top lip of the jaws may crush into the grain starting a crack in the soft and easily sheared wood. The rest as they say is history.

A similar situation occurs when using a recess, match the jaw profile etc.

All woods can be classified as suitable for particular applications according to their varying mechanical properties, crush strength, shear strength etc, and grain features, straight, interlocking etc. Unfortunately a lot of CL is soft, has straight grain & shears easily, so if we want to use it we have to modify our techniques to make sure we have enough cross sectional area in the tenon or the donut around the mortise to resist the shear forces created when we tighten the chuck jaws.

Stuart illustrates & explains his views very well, & I go along with his school of though, so no need to repeat.

Hi moby,
Yes, I must agree I like Stuart Batty very much, and I firstly
made the recess so I could carve feet on the bowl , so I wanted
the curve of the bowl to "follow through" , if you know what I
mean, I will hopefully get some shed time tomorrow and change
the profile to fit the chuck better , will post results tomorrow,
Thanks for your thoughts




Smiife, give superglue a try. I was skeptical like you until I tried it. The glue leaves a very fine film on the top and inner edge of the jaws, which comes off very easily. In fact it is easier to clean off the superglue than than Sanding Sealer and/or wax polish which gums up everything. And sprays everywhere when you buff it.
Richard

Hi Richard,
I will try the glue trick, I guess I was a bit concerned
abuot the clean up , but I am always open to suggestions
Thank you for your Input:2tsup:

Dalboy
15th October 2016, 09:40 PM
This is how I would chuck a bowl that I intend to put feet onto, I find it gives a better support to the tenon having the flat as seen in the video I posted earlier.

Sorry if this is common knowledge to many.397338

smiife
16th October 2016, 08:05 PM
Hi guys.
Finally got some shed time today , and decided to
attack that bowl that wouldn, t stay on the lathe !!
Thanks to all for there ideas and advice :2tsup:
So started by flattening the base level and used larger
jaws and superglue ! :o ! .............as i was pouring on
the glue i was thinking ,,,,,, mmmm not sure about this....
Anyway pressed on and shaped the bottom of the bowl
again , turned around and hollowed the inside , finished
In the norma way , eee and glow , it didn, t turn out to bad,,
But was not what i had pictured in the first place,!
Anyway it is what it is, no prize winner but i thought
I would show anyway, warts and all,,,,,
Just a note the glue trick work well and cleaned off easily
with a bit of sandpaper:cool:

Mobyturns
17th October 2016, 09:53 AM
A good photo is worth a thousand words.

Photo 3 (...121037) shows part of the problem and why you are having tenon failures.

Pay particular attention to the shadow between the face of the jaw and the "flat surface" on the rear of the bowl blank, they are not parallel. The bowl tenon should sit fully into the jaws so that there is no gap at all between the jaw face and flat, not bottom out on the base of the jaws, and so that the internal corner (tenon to flat) and the lip of the jaws meet.

For a tenon and chuck jaws to function as intended those two surface must meet and match well to form a "register." That registration surface should also be as wide as is practical. When "registered" there is little chance of movement between the two surfaces and it is possible to remove and replace the blank in the same position in the bowl jaws with minimal change in the centering of the blank.

With the tenon formed as you have the bowl is actually being supported and registered in the chuck jaws by the outer lip of the jaws and the inner dovetail surface of the jaws. As you turn the very minimal area of wood supported by the outer lip of the jaws (registration surface) crushes permitting the tenon to settle deeper into the dovetail recess and reduces the "grip" on the tenon, disturbing the registration of blank to chuck - thus permitting more vibration etc. On soft woods like Camphor Laurel it really becomes a significant issue.

Do you notice that you have to retighten the "loose" chuck jaws while turning? Does the bowl seem to be slightly off centre or have more vibration after you tighten?

The other issue is that the very nature of the dovetail jaw design is that it is a rather blunt wedge which will stress the internal corner of the tenon to flat as you tighten the chuck jaws if they are not well matched. The more it loosens the more we crank up the pressure on the jaws - leading to a crack initiating on the tenon. Add in soft wood that shears easily and you have a recipie for an unintended flying bowl object.

Stuart Batty explains this very well in the videos. They are almost mandatory viewing imo.

A poorly formed registration surface between jaw face and blank is the most significant weakness of scroll chuck design / use. Face plates offer a huge registration surface when compared to scroll chuck mounting and are a very good choice for turning soft easily sheared woods.

smiife
17th October 2016, 07:37 PM
A good photo is worth a thousand words.

Photo 3 (...121037) shows part of the problem and why you are having tenon failures.

Pay particular attention to the shadow between the face of the jaw and the "flat surface" on the rear of the bowl blank, they are not parallel. The bowl tenon should sit fully into the jaws so that there is no gap at all between the jaw face and flat, not bottom out on the base of the jaws, and so that the internal corner (tenon to flat) and the lip of the jaws meet.

For a tenon and chuck jaws to function as intended those two surface must meet and match well to form a "register." That registration surface should also be as wide as is practical. When "registered" there is little chance of movement between the two surfaces and it is possible to remove and replace the blank in the same position in the bowl jaws with minimal change in the centering of the blank.

With the tenon formed as you have the bowl is actually being supported and registered in the chuck jaws by the outer lip of the jaws and the inner dovetail surface of the jaws. As you turn the very minimal area of wood supported by the outer lip of the jaws (registration surface) crushes permitting the tenon to settle deeper into the dovetail recess and reduces the "grip" on the tenon, disturbing the registration of blank to chuck - thus permitting more vibration etc. On soft woods like Camphor Laurel it really becomes a significant issue.

Do you notice that you have to retighten the "loose" chuck jaws while turning? Does the bowl seem to be slightly off centre or have more vibration after you tighten?

The other issue is that the very nature of the dovetail jaw design is that it is a rather blunt wedge which will stress the internal corner of the tenon to flat as you tighten the chuck jaws if they are not well matched. The more it loosens the more we crank up the pressure on the jaws - leading to a crack initiating on the tenon. Add in soft wood that shears easily and you have a recipie for an unintended flying bowl object.

Stuart Batty explains this very well in the videos. They are almost mandatory viewing imo.

A poorly formed registration surface between jaw face and blank is the most significant weakness of scroll chuck design / use. Face plates offer a huge registration surface when compared to scroll chuck mounting and are a very good choice for turning soft easily sheared woods.


Hi moby,
Wow, I never saw that the jaws were not flat on surface
of the bottom of the bowl:o..............
I thought I had the bottom fairly flat, thanks for pointing
that out to me, I can see now why It is so important to
get the tenon perfect , I must admit I have never bothered
about It before , pity i didn, t cos i now have a nice scar on
my arm for my troubles.
I didn, t have to tighten the bowl at all , but then I did put
the superglue on chuck jaws too!
Glad you like my photos too!

dougturner
17th October 2016, 09:37 PM
Smiife, in my experience you are not going to have the break out shown in your photos if you make the recess about 3mm deeper than the actual foot, because then you have the full strength of the bowl blank thickness bearing against the chuck jaws in expansion mode, and not just the narrow foot to take the strain. If the foot is 4mm deep, just make the recess 7mm deep, and if you don't like the look of this design foot, don't make it flat bottomed, but make it convex to follow the approximate curve of the outside of the bowl. Just make sure it is below the level of the foot, so you don't end up with a giant spinning top! Then you can have two beers!

My two bob's worth, and sorry I haven't been on line for a while, as I have just had a total knee replacement operation. Haven't been to my local woodturners group nor even to my own lathe for about 6-8 weeks and have now got sawdust/shavings withdrawal. Doug.

Mobyturns
18th October 2016, 07:36 AM
Smiife, in my experience you are not going to have the break out shown in your photos if you make the recess about 3mm deeper than the actual foot, because then you have the full strength of the bowl blank thickness bearing against the chuck jaws in expansion mode, and not just the narrow foot to take the strain. If the foot is 4mm deep, just make the recess 7mm deep, and if you don't like the look of this design foot, don't make it flat bottomed, but make it convex to follow the approximate curve of the outside of the bowl. Just make sure it is below the level of the foot, so you don't end up with a giant spinning top! Then you can have two beers!

My two bob's worth, and sorry I haven't been on line for a while, as I have just had a total knee replacement operation. Haven't been to my local woodturners group nor even to my own lathe for about 6-8 weeks and have now got sawdust/shavings withdrawal. Doug.

Doug makes a good point about making the recess deeper as it very significantly increases the area of wood that supports the chuck jaws. However you must consider that extra depth when turning the inside of the bowl. I have seen a lot of very attractive bowls with papery thin bottoms. Personally I like to create the outside profile but leave the wood supporting the recess then refine it later when reverse chucking in cole jaws. Its an extra step but often the difference between a fail and a very nice bowl.

Big A
19th October 2016, 06:24 PM
Thank you for this discussion, gents. It is very timely, as I had just pulled a roughed out CL bowl out of the sawdust. It has about a 58mm tenon on a 180mm bowl and weighs 854 gm.

There is still 20mm thickness on the bottom, so I will use a bit of that for a bigger tenon and reshape as well. I am thinking that diameter of tenon is more important than depth (within reason of course), so I will cut it about 7-8mm and see how that looks.

Alister.

smiife
19th October 2016, 07:36 PM
This is how I would chuck a bowl that I intend to put feet onto, I find it gives a better support to the tenon having the flat as seen in the video I posted earlier.

Sorry if this is common knowledge to many.397338


Hi derek, sorry for the late reply , must have missed
It before, so what you do Is a recess and a tenon ?


Smiife, in my experience you are not going to have the break out shown in your photos if you make the recess about 3mm deeper than the actual foot, because then you have the full strength of the bowl blank thickness bearing against the chuck jaws in expansion mode, and not just the narrow foot to take the strain. If the foot is 4mm deep, just make the recess 7mm deep, and if you don't like the look of this design foot, don't make it flat bottomed, but make it convex to follow the approximate curve of the outside of the bowl. Just make sure it is below the level of the foot, so you don't end up with a giant spinning top! Then you can have two beers!

My two bob's worth, and sorry I haven't been on line for a while, as I have just had a total knee replacement operation. Haven't been to my local woodturners group nor even to my own lathe for about 6-8 weeks and have now got sawdust/shavings withdrawal. Doug.


Hi doug, good to see you back , some good Ideas there:2tsup:
are you saying the same as derek , make a tenon and recess ?


Thank you for this discussion, gents. It is very timely, as I had just pulled a roughed out CL bowl out of the sawdust. It has about a 58mm tenon on a 180mm bowl and weighs 854 gm.

There is still 20mm thickness on the bottom, so I will use a bit of that for a bigger tenon and reshape as well. I am thinking that diameter of tenon is more important than depth (within reason of course), so I will cut it about 7-8mm and see how that looks.

Alister.

Hi Alister, i think that size tenon should be ok , for that
size bowl , but hey as I have proved I ain, t no expert
hope you have more sucess than I did !:B

Dalboy
19th October 2016, 08:04 PM
Hi derek, sorry for the late reply , must have missed
It before, so what you do Is a recess and a tenon ?


In the diagram I drew it is a tenon but the same would apply if you decide to use a recess what I was trying to get at was having a flat area for the jaws to register against as in the vidoe I linked to earlier in the thread.

The bit about the feet was just to show the area that needs to be removed after reverse chucking leaving enough to make the feet for the bowl as you mentioned in your first post.

I am not the best person at putting things into the written word so hope none of this confuses you.:blush2:

Big A
19th October 2016, 08:32 PM
Hi smiife,

"Hi Alister, i think that size tenon should be ok , for that
size bowl , but hey as I have proved I ain, t no expert
hope you have more sucess than I did !"

Be that as it may, I am no stranger to catches, so I might as well take precautions!

A.

NCPaladin
21st October 2016, 07:35 AM
Just a few ideas you may want to consider...

It appears the first pics are with the 50mm jaws. If you draw circles the tenon will be about 2" diameter and the wood around a recess will be about 4" diameter. If you do your math for area you will find the recess has 3X more wood to break off than the tenon (assuming you have 1" around the recess).

It has been said that a recess is much easier to break while tightening the chuck than a tenon. That is true. If both are the correct size you can break the wood around the recess, to break a tenon you must also break/crush the steel jaws. With either you need to stop and check tightness fairly often with green wood. For the recess just snug it up good.

I assume your are turning, drying, and then re-turning. In your later pic it looks like the 130mm jaws. There is no reason you can't change jaw size when returning if you are using a tenon. So on the green you can use the 130's and when dry and returned you can drop down to the 100's if it fits your project better. Or go from the 100's down to the 70's or the 70's down to the 50's. I typically use a recess but with a tenon I almost always oversize for the project to start with and drop down when I re-turn.

StevoWoodi
22nd October 2016, 09:12 AM
I have been reading this thread with a great deal of interest and although I have been turning for several years a number of points made are new to me.

When I started turning bowls I used a recess and from time to time one would break away, as per the initial post. Subsequently I was encouraged by my fellow Woodturners of the Hunter club members to move to a spigot to improve the design elements, particularly when I was making thinner walled bowls.

Initially I used standard jaws with small spigots and had a couple break off which I assumed at the time was because they were just too small for the force involved. Now I am thinking that it may well have been because of improperly formed spigot and registration surface.

More recently I have been using a set of Vicmarc step jaws in a VM100 chuck without losing a single bowl, including some quite large specimens. I have put this down to the larger diameter alone. After reading previous posts in this thread I am now thinking/wondering whether the fact that if the spigot is more than 5mm high the step jaws can only grip a maximum 5mm of the spigot and the end of the spigot sits on the bottom of the step which then becomes the registration surface, and there is a gap between the face of the jaws and the base of the bowl so no shear force generated to start a crack through the point where the spigot joins the base of the bowl blank?

397757 397758

It may not be completely clear in the photos but the spigot is bottoming out on the step and there is a small (1mm) gap between the face of the jaws and the base of the platter.

BTW where can I find the info on Stuart Batty?

Thanks,

Steve

NCPaladin
22nd October 2016, 04:13 PM
If I am reading it correctly I think you will be better off with a shorter spigot.
With the spigot sitting on top of the inside step and a gap between the top of the jaws and the work piece it seems to me that it could rack more. I don't have a Vicmarc chuck but I assume they are similar to Nova step jaws.

Here is a link to Stuart Batty's videos on Vimeo. He has 30+ with three on chuck, recesses, tenons with each about 12-15 minutes.
https://vimeo.com/woodturning/videos/sort:alphabetical/format:thumbnail

Mobyturns
23rd October 2016, 08:59 AM
If I am reading it correctly I think you will be better off with a shorter spigot.
With the spigot sitting on top of the inside step and a gap between the top of the jaws and the work piece it seems to me that it could rack more. I don't have a Vicmarc chuck but I assume they are similar to Nova step jaws.

Here is a link to Stuart Batty's videos on Vimeo. He has 30+ with three on chuck, recesses, tenons with each about 12-15 minutes.
https://vimeo.com/woodturning/videos/sort:alphabetical/format:thumbnail

Stuart's videos on Vimeo explain the why's & why nots of tenon & recess design. Generally it is not recommended to have the base of the tenon register against the inside surface (base) of the chuck jaws - however IF your tenon base is formed truly square and flat it will create a good registration surface.

The forces generated while turning and especially in a catch event create some difficult to understand leverage forces that simply rip bowl tenons out of chuck jaws.

Most of the problems with flying bowls, tenon failures or problems with vibration etc can be traced back to poorly formed tenons. So it is really worth the time to true up and square off the base of the tenon, match the jaw profile, create a nice crisp internal corner etc.

Usually there is more at play than just a poorly formed tenon, blunt tools, poor technique, undersized tenon / recess for the mass of the blank, physical properties of the wood etc all contribute to failures

Big A
1st November 2016, 06:27 PM
In a further hijack of smiife's thread, I just wanted to report that I cut another tenon on my CL bowl and was able to complete the job without incident. This tenon is 75mm and I grabbed it with my ahem, coff, coff 3 jaw fabricated dovetail chuck.

Nice patterns in this bit of wood, as it is from a fork - a bit crotchety!

Cheers,
Alister.

smiife
1st November 2016, 07:24 PM
In a further hijack of smiife's thread, I just wanted to report that I cut another tenon on my CL bowl and was able to complete the job without incident. This tenon is 75mm and I grabbed it with my ahem, coff, coff 3 jaw fabricated dovetail chuck.

Nice patterns in this bit of wood, as it is from a fork - a bit crotchety!

Cheers,
Alister.

Hi alister,
You can hi-jack any time you like :2tsup:
Nice bowl , I like the shape and It, s good and deep
Did you finish the bottom yet ?
Got some great figure and colour going there.:cool:

Big A
1st November 2016, 09:01 PM
Yep smiife, the bowl is ready to finish. I used Cole jaws in expansion mode and the tailstock to hold it while I chopped most of the tenon off, then used a belt sander to tidy up. I left it with a plain flat bottom, which is a bit ordinary, but didn't think there was enough meat left to fancify it. It is a pity that the best of the figure is in the inside where you have to look for it.

The bowl is only about 50mm deep, but looks more in the photo.

Alister.