Results 1 to 15 of 37
Thread: Angle of the Dangle
-
3rd February 2018, 02:39 PM #1Novice
- Join Date
- Jun 2017
- Location
- Far South Coast NSW
- Posts
- 10
Angle of the Dangle
G'day all
I have 3 pieces of timber each at 760 mm
I need to join them at angles
Piece #1 will be sitting on a base with a bottom angle cut at 11.5 degrees
Piece #2
Piece #3 is the top piece and the top angle on this is 22.5 degrees
So, how do I calculate what the angles (equal) for the two middle joins would be?
Hope this makes sense.
Cheers
Horatio
-
3rd February 2018 02:39 PM # ADSGoogle Adsense Advertisement
- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Posts
- Many
-
3rd February 2018, 03:24 PM #2GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Apr 2013
- Location
- Sydney
- Posts
- 1,557
I might be wrong, and generally am but if your joining 2 pieces together the angle is halved for them to meet perfectly.
a picture or drawing wouldn't go astray to figure out what your trying to achieve.
-
3rd February 2018, 05:21 PM #3GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- May 2011
- Location
- Albury
- Posts
- 3,040
Three pieces joined, isn't that a triangle?
-
3rd February 2018, 06:28 PM #4.
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- Perth
- Posts
- 27,796
-
3rd February 2018, 07:05 PM #5Novice
- Join Date
- Jun 2017
- Location
- Far South Coast NSW
- Posts
- 10
-
3rd February 2018, 07:59 PM #6Woodworking mechanic
- Join Date
- Jan 2014
- Location
- Sydney Upper North Shore
- Posts
- 4,470
I think each angle should be (208) 152 degrees. I’ll wait for others to confirm.
- you have a pentagon - 5 sides.
- a pentagon has 540 degrees
- angles shown are 90, (11.5) 78.5 and (22.5) 67.5 which = (124) 236 degrees.
- 540-(124) 236 =(426) 304 degrees
therefore two equal angles = (208) 304 degrees = single angle 152 degrees
Red numbers are incorrect @
- used outside anglesLast edited by Lappa; 3rd February 2018 at 08:55 PM. Reason: Used outside angles - changed to indide
-
3rd February 2018, 08:27 PM #7
Should be 152° each joint providing you are going to use equal angles. Cuts would be 76° on the end of each piece.
Angle.JPG
-
3rd February 2018, 08:46 PM #8GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- May 2011
- Location
- Albury
- Posts
- 3,040
If you want the angle on each of those four ends to be the same then the ends should be cut to 28 degrees. (11.5 + 22.5 + 28 + 28 = 90) However, you can cut them to whatever angle you like to get the effect you want as long as the initial 34 degrees (11.5 plus 22.5) plus whatever you want to cut the intermediates to adds up to 90 degrees.
-
3rd February 2018, 08:52 PM #9GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- May 2011
- Location
- Albury
- Posts
- 3,040
Gee, we're a lot of help aren't we. Any chances we can get a consensus on this for the poor OP.
-
3rd February 2018, 09:02 PM #10Woodworking mechanic
- Join Date
- Jan 2014
- Location
- Sydney Upper North Shore
- Posts
- 4,470
I agree with Treecycle. On my first go I used the outside angles not the inside angles
-
3rd February 2018, 09:05 PM #11.
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- Perth
- Posts
- 27,796
-
3rd February 2018, 09:09 PM #12
Hang on - at school, we were taught that the angle of the dangle was proportional to the lustre of the cluster.....
-
3rd February 2018, 09:14 PM #13GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Oct 2014
- Location
- Caroline Springs, VIC
- Posts
- 1,645
There isn't enough information available to solve the riddle.
You have three pieces of timber. All 760mm long. The first shoots up into the air launching from a base at an angle of 11.5°.
Then there is a second piece, also 760mm long at "whatever angle"
Then the third piece which connects to the second point (at whatever x,y location) is at 22.5° from the horizon.
If we assume that the start point of the first piece at 11.5° is at 0,0 coordinates, the third piece at 22.5° end point is at what coordinate? Basically, how high up and how far across?
Here is an image using the specified 760mm equal length pieces, first at 11.5° and the third at 22.5° with the second piece being randomly placed which changes the internal angles.
3angles.jpg
-
3rd February 2018, 09:26 PM #14Woodworking mechanic
- Join Date
- Jan 2014
- Location
- Sydney Upper North Shore
- Posts
- 4,470
I believe if you keep the lengths of timber at 760mm and the three known angles (90, 78.5 and 67.5) the same you end up with a fixed height and width. If you try to alter the height and width then the 78.5 and 67.5 angles would have to change, or the lengths of timber would have to change or a mixture of the two, wouldn’t they?
-
3rd February 2018, 09:29 PM #15GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Oct 2014
- Location
- Caroline Springs, VIC
- Posts
- 1,645
Nope. if you reduce the height, you increase the width. And vice versa. It still maintains the three lengths being 760mm long, the first at 11.5° and the last at 22.5°. So just need to know the throw or the rise and the riddle be no riddle no more.
Similar Threads
-
Right angle attachment for dremel v right angle drill
By The Muss in forum HAND TOOLS - POWEREDReplies: 9Last Post: 30th September 2014, 02:45 PM -
Cutter angle for a 12-060 low angle block plane
By scoobs6170 in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWEREDReplies: 3Last Post: 22nd February 2009, 09:46 AM -
Having trouble understanding low-angle vs high angle planes
By wsal in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWEREDReplies: 4Last Post: 2nd December 2008, 12:04 AM -
Spokeshaves - Low Angle or not low angle, that is the question
By Slavo in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWEREDReplies: 10Last Post: 6th June 2005, 09:36 AM