Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 56
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    near Mackay
    Age
    59
    Posts
    4,635

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mobyturns View Post
    A variant of the "impossible dovetail" technique??? Impossible Dovetails | Popular Woodworking
    Possibly.
    I think there could be 2 different ways to do it based on the way I am thinking of.
    The first way, as I explained in my other post, would need the round shaped bit formed as an oval, so that when it exits the side, and is planed flat, it will look circular.
    The other way would be to cut the round part at 90 degrees to the sides, as shown in the CAD drawings back up top, and cut the corresponding “hole” as the drawings, but widen the hole into a slot that goes out at 45 at the back of the board but keep the exit hole round, so that it can be assembled in the same way.
    Not sure if my explanation is understandable, if not I could draw a picture and post a photo of it. I don’t have any CAD program to draw it up.
    ​Brad.

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Age
    2010
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    5,130

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ironwood
    I think the round, dowel shaped bit will be at 45 degrees to the sides, you cannot see this as it’s completely hidden.
    If they are all cut and drilled at 45, all 4 sides will be able to be pushed together simultaneously, creating the illusion that you can see from the outside.
    This is the only way this joint can be accomplished using solid timber.
    Quote Originally Posted by Mobyturns
    A variant of the "impossible dovetail" technique??? ...
    Quote Originally Posted by GraemeCook View Post
    That was my first reaction, too, .... I have tried drawing it multiple times with variant angles - 45°, 50°, 60°, etc, but none worked. ....

    Yazawa has confirmed that it is not a varient of the angled dovetails, twisted dovetails, rising dovetails, etc. but has otherwise remained stum.
    I am pretty sure it is not a variant of an angled dovetail, aka impossible dovetail.

  4. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    5,130

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ironwood View Post
    Possibly.
    .....
    Not sure if my explanation is understandable, if not I could draw a picture and post a photo of it. I don’t have any CAD program to draw it up.
    A hell of a lot of variations have been tried; none has worked so far.

    If you can draw your idea, I might be able to convert it to a CAD drawing so we can look at it from all conceivable angles.

  5. #19
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    4,969

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GraemeCook View Post

    PS: The Yazawa keyhole joint has been discussed extensively on many forums starting about 15 years ago - including Woodworkform and FestoolOwnersGroup and others.
    I'm trying to ignore this little fact but I know all the thoughts I'm having have been thought before.

    Nevertheless I'm going out on a limb to say there are only two initial moves possible when disassembling the joint and I think only one of those allows the complete disassembly of the joint. Just need to work out how to disassemble it and run it in reverse. If he'd left a clue, such as the top and bottom fingers being on different boards that would have eliminated one of them. But I think I might be up to where you are Graeme, now working out how to put words into joinery

  6. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    5,130

    Default

    Good luck!

    I have got so close so many times ....

    Quote Originally Posted by mic-d View Post
    I'm trying to ignore this little fact but I know all the thoughts I'm having have been thought before.
    Yeah; a lot of "solutions" that did not work.

    Also an incredible amount of brain effort invested.

  7. #21
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    5,130

    Default Current Position

    We haven't advanced very far. I have a hypothesis that I want to test but cannot work out how to craft stage 1.

    As stated before, I do not want to reveal my "magic" stage 2 at this point in time. None of Yazawa's dramatic: "My secrets will go to my grave"; I just do not want to add to the long list of "solutions" that did not work.

    My big question is: How do I cut the joints depicted below?


    Quote Originally Posted by GraemeCook View Post
    I have been fascinated by that joint and have been attempting solve it for almost 20 years. I think that I may have a workable solution in two parts:
    1. Craft the pins and tails of the joint, then
    2. Make an elegantly simple variation so that it may be assembled.


    I do not want to reveal step 2 in case it is an intellectual dead end. However, I am stuck on Step 1. How do you actually cut that joint with the needed level of precision, and lack of tool room?


    Attachment 535805

    Attachment 535806

    Remember, this joint cannot be assembled until I work some "impossible magic" on it. However, I cannot test my hypothesis until I make a pair of joints as above.

  8. #22
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Age
    70
    Posts
    2,735

    Default

    If it just for testing the possible ways to assemble the joint, perhaps you could concentrate on assembly only by dummying up the fingers first by drilling holes in the appropriate mortise locations, then cutting a standard finger joint followed by inserting some dowels into the locations of the cylindrical tenon locations?
    Franklin

  9. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    4,969

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GraemeCook View Post
    We haven't advanced very far. I have a hypothesis that I want to test but cannot work out how to craft stage 1.

    As stated before, I do not want to reveal my "magic" stage 2 at this point in time. None of Yazawa's dramatic: "My secrets will go to my grave"; I just do not want to add to the long list of "solutions" that did not work.

    My big question is: How do I cut the joints depicted below?

    My answer to that without giving away what I'm going to try for the first part of cutting the joint is to truncate the 'dowel' part at about the depth of their diameter, then you only have to shape maybe an 8mm deep circle. It's pretty clear that the joint can't go together with the dowels in the guts of the joint. As far as how to cut the joint, I'm keeping my idea close to my chest until it's added to the list of failures.

    Setting aside compressing the small section remaining as a last resort...

    Here are the obvious things I repeat to myself which help limit the path the assembly must take. The internal corner is a perfect corner, there are no cuts beyond the lines of the corner. The only path the dowels can take is in through the part of the joint that will be buried or exactly through the hole from the outside. The through fingers on the top and bottom cannot be moved 'out of the way' by bending, splitting along the grain etc. Ultimately the assembly method must be compatible with box construction - you've got to make a rectangle/square.

  10. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    5,130

    Default

    Thanks, Franklin

    My first reaction is that is great idea for proof of concept. I will do a CAD drawing - should verify its validity.

    But after we prove the concept, we are back to the original question:
    How do we cut the complex keyhole tenons and mirror mortices?

  11. #25
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    5,130

    Default Franklin's Concept

    I have drawn Franklin's concept and it looks feasible.

    Dowel Trial 1.jpg Start with two sides of timber


    Drill dowel holes Dowel Trial 2.jpg

    Dowel Trial 3.jpg Cut finger joints

    Assemble finger joints Dowel Trial 4.jpg

    Dowel Trial 5.jpg Insert dowels

    But we didn't really want dowels Dowel Trial 6.jpg


    Thanks, Franklin, this has proved how it might go together and has given me some ideas on how I might actually cut it. Need to think it through a little more. And the level of precision required is daunting.

  12. #26
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    4,969

    Default

    Graeme did you receive my pm?

  13. #27
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    5,130

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mic-d View Post
    Graeme did you receive my pm?
    Yes; I am thinking .... Will get back to you.

  14. #28
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    4,969

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GraemeCook View Post
    Yes; I am thinking .... Will get back to you.
    Never sure the electrons get to the right place

  15. #29
    Mobyturns's Avatar
    Mobyturns is offline In An Instant Your Life Can Change Forever
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    "Brownsville" Nth QLD
    Age
    66
    Posts
    4,435

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GraemeCook View Post
    I have drawn Franklin's concept and it looks feasible.

    Dowel Trial 1.jpg Start with two sides of timber


    Drill dowel holes Dowel Trial 2.jpg

    Dowel Trial 3.jpg Cut finger joints

    Assemble finger joints Dowel Trial 4.jpg

    Dowel Trial 5.jpg Insert dowels

    But we didn't really want dowels Dowel Trial 6.jpg


    Thanks, Franklin, this has proved how it might go together and has given me some ideas on how I might actually cut it. Need to think it through a little more. And the level of precision required is daunting.
    That is certainly one way to imitate the look but there are no advantages structurally over a plain finger joint, nor creating the "howhedodat" factor. In the original photos there is perfect end grain match across the "dowel" portion into the remainder of the fingers, so definitely not how they were done.

    A close inspection of all the images I can find of these joints leads me to believe they aren't even glued, so appear to rely entirely on the mechanical design for the joints structural integrity.
    Last edited by Mobyturns; 2nd March 2024 at 11:33 PM. Reason: added last line.
    Mobyturns

    In An Instant Your Life CanChange Forever

  16. #30
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Age
    70
    Posts
    2,735

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mobyturns View Post
    That is certainly one way to imitate the look but there are no advantages structurally over a plain finger joint, nor creating the "howhedodat" factor. In the original photos there is perfect end grain match across the "dowel" portion into the reainder of the fingers, so definitely not how they were done.

    A close inspection of all the images I can find of these joints leads me to believe they aren't even glued, so appear to rely entirely on the mechanical design for the joints structural integrity.
    I was never suggesting this as a method for actual construction. I was simply trying to suggest a way of constructing prototype mortice and tenon elements that can be played around with (and modified as required) easily enough to test possible assembly methods. Clearly these profiles can't be cut from solid timber as is and assembled as the final joint.

    Work out how to assembly the joint first, then worry about how to cut the joinery.

    Just sayin..
    Franklin

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 27
    Last Post: 17th January 2008, 03:47 PM
  2. Replies: 17
    Last Post: 15th June 2007, 12:49 AM
  3. Master Kintaro Yazawa
    By Sculptured Box in forum BOX MAKING
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 13th April 2007, 09:08 PM
  4. A bandsaw box as a homage to Kintaro Yazawa
    By Sculptured Box in forum BANDSAWN BOXES
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 14th November 2006, 08:39 PM
  5. Kintaro Yazawa's Original Jointwork.
    By labolle in forum Links to: INSPIRATIONAL WEB SITES
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 8th June 2006, 08:25 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •