Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 56
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Perth
    Age
    60
    Posts
    240

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GraemeCook View Post
    When questioned about the construction of that keyhole joint Yazawa simply said: "My secrets will go to my grave".

    I have been fascinated by that joint and have been attempting solve it for almost 20 years. I think that I may have a workable solution in two parts:
    1. Craft the pins and tails of the joint, then
    2. Make an elegantly simple variation so that it may be assembled.


    I do not want to reveal step 2 in case it is an intellectual dead end. However, I am stuck on Step 1. How do you actually cut that joint with the needed level of precision, and lack of tool room?

    Attachment 535804



    Attachment 535805

    Attachment 535806

    Remember, this joint cannot be assembled until I work some "impossible magic" on it. However, I cannot test my hypothesis until I make a pair of joints as above.

    The joint must be cut to extremely fine tollerances - precision is essential. Some parts seem relatively straight forward:
    • The round tenon is just a drilled hole,
    • The flat tenon - continuation of round tenon - is also easy.

    But I cannot think og a way to cut other parts, certainly not with the required level of precision:
    • Keyhole tenon contains both round and flat elements,
    • Round part must be truly round,
    • Flat part must be flat and precise,
    • Mortices either side of keyhole tenon are not uniform,
    • Curved section must match perfectly with round part of tenon,
    • Ditto - flat section.


    How can I cut this? Yazawa has done it, so it is not impossible.
    Graeme, in your second post you showed a “disassembled” view of the joinery. Is that just your guess? Clearly it can’t be correct, there is your starting point! I am just bewildered, solving the problem might consume what’s left of my life! Good luck! I’m leaning towards some 45 degree deception myself!
    Swifty

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Age
    2010
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #32
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    5,130

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mobyturns View Post
    A close inspection of all the images I can find of these joints leads me to believe they aren't even glued, so appear to rely entirely on the mechanical design for the joints structural integrity.
    Hell! I had not even considered that possibility.

    Have just had a good look at high resolution photos of the jewelry box and you may well be right. Certainly not an excess of glue, but I cannot be absolutely sure.

    The plot thickens.

  4. #33
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    5,130

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Swifty View Post
    Graeme, in your second post you showed a “disassembled” view of the joinery. Is that just your guess? Clearly it can’t be correct, there is your starting point! I am just bewildered, solving the problem might consume what’s left of my life!
    Read the series of posts and all will be as clear as mud. That "disassembled" view is essential before my step 2 - which, inigmatically, I am withholding. We are trying to workout how to cut those shapes.

    A lot of people have been trying to solve it for almost 20 years - many false "solutions" but ... you are very welcome to try.


    Good luck! I’m leaning towards some 45 degree deception myself!
    I have tried many options with variant degrees, none looked like working, and also Yazawa has stated that it is not a variant of the angled dovetail.

  5. #34
    Mobyturns's Avatar
    Mobyturns is offline In An Instant Your Life Can Change Forever
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    "Brownsville" Nth QLD
    Age
    66
    Posts
    4,435

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GraemeCook View Post
    Hell! I had not even considered that possibility.


    Have just had a good look at high resolution photos of the jewelry box and you may well be right. Certainly not an excess of glue, but I cannot be absolutely sure.


    The plot thickens.

    Grasshopper, like all the great masters the only way to learn their secrets is to serve an indentured apprenticeship with them and to accept the associated obligation to not share that knowledge.


    So many secrets of wood working remain unsolved. Just look at Yosegi, Tunbridge ware, even Buffard Fereres inlay banding constructions, still lots of mystery about how the more complex designs were achieved or could be produced at a market competitive / acceptable price. Those secrets are earned but only if you are worthy.


    If you look at the other complex joints Kintaro Yazawa makes they also appear to be the same - unglued. It's pretty difficult but not impossible to disguise the use of glue in a dovetail like joint.


    I love the mystery and fully respect Kintaro Yazawa's playful teasing of potential imitators, such grace in acknowledging his own superiority as a maker whilst "seeing off any potential competition". At least he has passed on his knowledge and those guarded "commercial in confidence" trade secrets to his staff.


    Another issue to consider here is the knowledge about how to construct that joint really is of curiosity or novelty value to us but it has significant commercial value and I might say adds a considerable premium to the unique work produced in Kintaro Yazawa's workshop and by him and his staff.


    Intellectual Property Rights are difficult and expensive to protect, look up the numerous court cases involving glass artist Dale Chihuly. There is also no guarantee that the courts, or the court of popular opinion will side with the original maker either. It is indeed nigh on impossible to protect process IP, registered designs - yes, copyright - yes; process - no; patents - for a term. So the only realistic avenue to protect one's lively hood is through highly guarded "commercial in confidence" trade secrets and to demand loyalty from those entrusted with those secrets. The formula for Coke a Cola syrup is a testament to the value of a closely guarded trade secret - real or imagined.
    Mobyturns

    In An Instant Your Life CanChange Forever

  6. #35
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Location
    Sunshine Coast
    Posts
    93

    Default

    What about this:
    IMG.jpg
    Not sure if he only uses hand tools, but the slot in the finger could be cut with a router (a bit at a time, with plenty of support, carefully!) then the piece with the keyhole shape could be steam bent to 45deg. I must admit though I have no experience with steam bending so I don't know how possible this is. The rest of the joint could be cut with a router like a standard finger joint (from the face of the board, not the side, and then then shoulders cleaned up with a chisel) but leaving a bit to be hand shaped round with a small file for the male keyhole part. The corresponding female keyhole part could be drilled with a small forstner bit. Then, the joint could be slid together at 45deg and the male keyhole shape be steam bent back into place, with something to fill the slot first if desired. Of course, it would have to be glued unless another solution can be found to hold the joint together. A bit hard to describe and I'm not saying this is necessarily how he did it, but it's a thought.

  7. #36
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    4,970

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mannetje View Post
    What about this:
    IMG.jpg
    Not sure if he only uses hand tools, but the slot in the finger could be cut with a router (a bit at a time, with plenty of support, carefully!) then the piece with the keyhole shape could be steam bent to 45deg. I must admit though I have no experience with steam bending so I don't know how possible this is. The rest of the joint could be cut with a router like a standard finger joint (from the face of the board, not the side, and then then shoulders cleaned up with a chisel) but leaving a bit to be hand shaped round with a small file for the male keyhole part. The corresponding female keyhole part could be drilled with a small forstner bit. Then, the joint could be slid together at 45deg and the male keyhole shape be steam bent back into place, with something to fill the slot first if desired. Of course, it would have to be glued unless another solution can be found to hold the joint together. A bit hard to describe and I'm not saying this is necessarily how he did it, but it's a thought.

    I admire your drafting skill!

  8. #37
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Location
    Sunshine Coast
    Posts
    93

    Default

    ....remembered something from school..

  9. #38
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    4,970

    Default

    I am moderately certain that the first move of the board without the through fingers on top and bottom (call this the short board and the other one the long board - just for ease of describing) is an oblique move. If you look at the detail closeup photo earlier, you will see deep shadows around some of the long board keyhole holes. This fits with there being a void into which the short board would move.
    Next week I hope to have a new handtool to help cut the keyhole finger joints and then it should be a matter of relieving some hidden areas on both boards and drilling a path for the one set of key pins to exit. This is the step where I expect to fail.
    Last edited by mic-d; 31st March 2024 at 01:56 PM. Reason: tried clarifying explanation

  10. #39
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    5,130

    Default

    Thanks Manetje

    Mic-d suggested something quite similar in Post #12; it was trialed about 10 or 12 years ago but no one could make it work - they kept snapping on the short grain.

    Short Grain.jpg

    I never thought of using steam bending and am unsure of its applicability in this situation. It looks like the bend is too sharp.

    Also, I did not understand your reference to assembling at 45° - as everything seems to be at 90°.

  11. #40
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    5,130

    Default

    Still watching with interest mic-d. If you look at the photos of the inside of Yazawa's jewelry box, the corners are quite clear - no visible trenches which possibly would be needed for diagonal sliding joint. I have tried so many varients of this but none got close to working.

    But you may come up with something I never thought of??

    As to tooling, I have been thinking along the lines of miniature chisels, mini gouges, mini-scorp, etc, even dental instruments. My guess is that Yazawa's jewelry box has finger joints about 3 mm wide. That defines the size of the tools!

  12. #41
    Mobyturns's Avatar
    Mobyturns is offline In An Instant Your Life Can Change Forever
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    "Brownsville" Nth QLD
    Age
    66
    Posts
    4,435

    Default

    Look at the high level skill required in setting out then making the joints in his Hishigata box and the geometry of the joint set out.
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Mobyturns

    In An Instant Your Life CanChange Forever

  13. #42
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    5,130

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mobyturns View Post
    Look at the high level skill required in setting out then making the joints in his Hishigata box and the geometry of the joint set out.

    Diamond Joint 2.jpg Diamond Joint 1.jpg
    Those "diamond" finger joints allegedly have fingers that are 0.3 mm wide - the kerf of a dozuki?

    It is really hard to get your head around that joint. I have reasonable CAD skills and it took me two days to workout its construction and how to draw it. It is basically a mixture of a finger joint and a mitre joint.

  14. #43
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    4,970

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GraemeCook View Post
    Still watching with interest mic-d. If you look at the photos of the inside of Yazawa's jewelry box, the corners are quite clear - no visible trenches which possibly would be needed for diagonal sliding joint. I have tried so many varients of this but none got close to working.

    But you may come up with something I never thought of??

    As to tooling, I have been thinking along the lines of miniature chisels, mini gouges, mini-scorp, etc, even dental instruments. My guess is that Yazawa's jewelry box has finger joints about 3 mm wide. That defines the size of the tools!
    With regard to the internal corners please revisit post 23. I made a list of observation in it, including normal internal corners. I’ve settled on 5mm fingers 8mm key pins which allows plenty of meat left on the keyhole fingers. Crawl before walking

  15. #44
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    5,130

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mic-d View Post
    I’ve settled on 5mm fingers 8mm key pins which allows plenty of meat left on the keyhole fingers. Crawl before walking
    My thinking is also heading the same way.


    My best guess is that Yazawa's finger joints are 3 mm wide, and the key holes are about 7 mm wide, but they are oval, so perhaps 7x4 or 7x5. That would certainly give you a lot more room for maneuvering tools.

  16. #45
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    4,970

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GraemeCook View Post
    My thinking is also heading the same way.


    My best guess is that Yazawa's finger joints are 3 mm wide, and the key holes are about 7 mm wide, but they are oval, so perhaps 7x4 or 7x5. That would certainly give you a lot more room for maneuvering tools.
    they are oval??. I know they look oval in the detail shot but I thought that was foreshortening. They look circular in the first photo to me. This is important to know!

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 27
    Last Post: 17th January 2008, 03:47 PM
  2. Replies: 17
    Last Post: 15th June 2007, 12:49 AM
  3. Master Kintaro Yazawa
    By Sculptured Box in forum BOX MAKING
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 13th April 2007, 09:08 PM
  4. A bandsaw box as a homage to Kintaro Yazawa
    By Sculptured Box in forum BANDSAWN BOXES
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 14th November 2006, 08:39 PM
  5. Kintaro Yazawa's Original Jointwork.
    By labolle in forum Links to: INSPIRATIONAL WEB SITES
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 8th June 2006, 08:25 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •