Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Needs Pictures Needs Pictures:  0
Picture(s) thanks Picture(s) thanks:  0
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Wonga Beach North QLD
    Posts
    345

    Default Roof framing - rafter spacings options

    Currently on the roof framing calculator on blocklayer.com, you enter rafter spacings (centres) you want and depending on the building (roof) length, it calculates the spacings to fit evenly in the length. So, if necessary, it alters your spacing input to get even spacings. A couple of blokes from the US have emailed saying they use sheathing directly on the rafter and need exact spacings. So, to keep the spacings exact, if the total length (of the ridge) doesn't suit, either 1, or both end spacings will be smaller. I have altered (a test version of) the calculator to see how it will work.
    You select either 'Adjust Spacing' or 'Exact Spacing'. If its exact, it calculates BOTH end spacings down. So the commons at each end of the ridge have smaller spacings than the rest of the commons and creepers.
    So, does that make sense ?

    The test version is here http://www.blocklayer.com/roof/default2.aspx
    To test, enter 10600 for length - select 'Exact Spacing' and it should show end spacings of 500mm

    Thanks for any guidance here, and sorry for the longwinded explanation and post

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Canberra
    Age
    72
    Posts
    394

    Default

    Seems to work fine and I used a few of my own sizes too. US is mainly still using their feet & inches although trying to get used to metric I know.

    They generally use ply over all external surfaces on walls & roof so would want standard sheets to join over the centre of rafters (or studs) - so your exact spacings should give them 18" centres (~450mm) or 36" (~900) or 4' (~1200mm) etc whereas modules of 300mm often work better in metric.

    If it were me doing the building I would prefer the spacings to be exact from one end (either would do) to suit full sheets then a single odd spacing - just because I am lazy and would prefer just one cut than two. And might be a bit fussy to deal with if the small space is very small - eg: say under 200mm. Not sure if that's possible, but maybe that is an option too?

    BTW - your site is just brilliant - so useful!

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Wonga Beach North QLD
    Posts
    345

    Default

    Thanks for taking a look Bloss

    I now have the metric and imperial versions set up with options to select 'Adjust Spacing' or 'Exact Spacing'.

    For Exact spacings, the drawing shows both end spacings adjusted, but you can easily just work from 1 end and adjust the other. If I add another option to select 1, or both ends, it will just get to complicated?

    .

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Canberra
    Age
    72
    Posts
    394

    Default

    I reckon it will be OK just with those options.

    I suppose you could add a note somewhere indicating that adjustments can be made at either end, but most people who would understand what the calculators are doing and know the terminology should be smart & experienced enough to work it out themselves.


    Getting angles etc worked out for you sure beats using my old steel roofing square, clamps and rafter tables!

Similar Threads

  1. roof framing, irregular hips
    By dirtydeeds in forum WOODWORK - GENERAL
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 28th July 2007, 06:23 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •