Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 35 of 35
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    San Antonio, Texas, USA
    Posts
    3,070

    Default

    I'm reading the paper now. Haven't gotten to the supplemental matter but a few things pop out.

    The authors report in the Methods section processing basswood, Eastern white pine, poplar, Western red cedar and 'oak' without specifying the species. They only report tensile data for the processing of basswood and oak, which one of the 90 varieties native to the USA or ~600 varieties worldwide was used for the experiments is not specified!?

    The processing consists of boiling the test blocks in a solution of 2.5 M NaOH/0.4M Na2SO3 for 7 hours, or for variable times followed by boiling in water to 'remove the chemicals'. The mechanical properties of the processed wood go through a maximum and then decline with continued chemical bath boiling. The species used for this part of the testing are not clearly specified. No mention in the body of the paper whether or not or how they checked the concentration of 'chemicals' remaining in the test specimens.

    The pressing was accomplished by uniaxial (pressed between plates normal to the long axis of the grain) compression of the test blocks at 100 oC for 1 day. 8 hours or 24 hours isn't specified. Hot press (i.e. continuous heating) or hot initial test block with cooling to ambient in the press isn't specified. The strength increase of the treated blocks ranges from ~6X for oak to ~12X for cedar. The fracture resistance increases about 3X for oak and 9.4X for cedar.

    They also report penetration resistance using a gas gun to test. Penetration resistance increases about 8 fold for densified wood and by 10 fold for laminated densified wood.

    The processed product also absorbs atmospheric humidity and swells. The authors state that this tendency is reduced or eliminated by painting.

    Overall a surprisingly incomplete report. Sadly this is becoming more common in the scientific literature. I'll get the supplementary materials and report more.
    Innovations are those useful things that, by dint of chance, manage to survive the stupidity and destructive tendencies inherent in human nature.

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #32
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    5,122

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rob streeper View Post
    .....Overall a surprisingly incomplete report. Sadly this is becoming more common in the scientific literature. I'll get the supplementary materials and report more.

    Good Morning Rob

    A little surprised by your assessment but it is very consistent with the published material that I have seen.

    The University of Maryland is a quite respected institution, certainly not a degree mill, and one would expect them not to be a party to shoddy research, or premature publication. Ditto for Nature.

    Wonder what is going on? A number of scenarios:
    • the kernel of the research is burried in the supplementary material, that you have not yet read,
    • they have deliberately published early to forestall publication of parallel research,
    • details are being deliberately withheld until patents are in place or to protect trade secrets,
    • something else?



    Fair Winds

    Graeme

  4. #33
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    San Antonio, Texas, USA
    Posts
    3,070

    Default

    Hi Graeme,


    I've looked at the 'Extended Data' listed on the Nature site. (https://www.nature.com/articles/natu...ry-information)
    Nothing new, just a reprise of the figures in the paper.

    The 'supplementary information' is a video of the ballistic tests.

    The paper is very short on detail. Which oak?

    I wouldn't be surprised to see this paper pop up on the dissection table of Retraction Watch. Retraction Watch

    Regards,
    Rob

    P.S. If you'd like to have a look PM me a real email addr.
    Innovations are those useful things that, by dint of chance, manage to survive the stupidity and destructive tendencies inherent in human nature.

  5. #34
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    5,125

    Default Tokyo - 350 metres tall


  6. #35
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    San Antonio, Texas, USA
    Posts
    3,070

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by woodPixel View Post
    Not exactly economical is it?
    Innovations are those useful things that, by dint of chance, manage to survive the stupidity and destructive tendencies inherent in human nature.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Similar Threads

  1. The science of a crosscut saw
    By hiroller in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWERED
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 9th December 2015, 12:48 AM
  2. Getting thin very strong flexible wood like the old Ladders?
    By Tegmark in forum WOODWORK - GENERAL
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 2nd June 2015, 03:09 PM
  3. Art & Science
    By pmcgee in forum NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH WOODWORK
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 16th March 2014, 08:35 PM
  4. good science, bad science and twaddle
    By stolar in forum NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH WOODWORK
    Replies: 85
    Last Post: 26th December 2010, 01:32 PM
  5. I need a steel strong box! NOT a 2nd Mortgage!
    By Kaiser Soze in forum METALWORK FORUM
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 12th April 2009, 08:24 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •