Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Needs Pictures: 0
Picture(s) thanks: 0
Results 1 to 11 of 11
Thread: Photoshop and Picasa
-
7th November 2009, 09:04 AM #1
Photoshop and Picasa
I tried a 30 day trial of Photoshop recently. I'm aware that it is a powerful program and that I probably only touched upon 1% of it's potential. Up until now I've been using Picasa which does and excellent job of:
organising photos
straightening (my weird brain tends to tilt the camera to the left these day ),
dust removal
cropping
colour/contrast adjustments.
But the two questions I want to ask here are:
1) Since PS is very expensive, and Picasa is free, and since in my personal experience Picasa does all I want, why should I buy PS?
2) What do other photographers interested in landscape photography use photoshop to do?Last edited by Rossluck; 7th November 2009 at 09:06 AM. Reason: Mispelled Picasa in heading.
-
7th November 2009 09:04 AM # ADSGoogle Adsense Advertisement
- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Age
- 2010
- Posts
- Many
-
7th November 2009, 10:15 AM #2
Photoshop is aimed at people who work with photos professionally. It supports a number of extra colour models aside from RGB, such as CMYK, which is the colour space used in commercial printing.
It also allows you to specify colours from ink matching systems such as Pantone, as well as being able to undertake other tasks specific to getting ink on paper - such as grey component replacement and under colour removal (for example, if you are going to print a picture on newsprint, you want to make sure that no area of the photo receives more than about 300% ink, otherwise your colours start blocking up).
The more recent versions also give some really nice features for integrating with 3D packages so that you can bring 3D work into Photoshop to blend it with real images.
It also works very well with InDesign, the leading desk top publishing software.
-
7th November 2009, 11:09 AM #3
Fair enough MS. You make it sound like the photographic version of desktop publishing software. What I'm specifically wondering is if for some reason unkown to me now I NEED Photoshop. As a person who likes landscape photography and doesn't really want to muck around with photos too much (a bit of a purist attitude), should I be happy with Picasa? When I saw the dodge and burn tool in PS I almost bit the bullet and bought it, but then I was disappointed with the colour of the "burnt"areas and the inability to adjust the burn so that it was light (trying to darken clouds on the distant horizon).
-
7th November 2009, 11:38 AM #4.
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- Perth
- Posts
- 27,796
For most people tweaking and organizing photos, like the 4 things you mentioned you most often do, I wouldn't bother to get PS.
PS comes into it's own if you need to really manipulate and combine and blend multiple images within the same image. I've been using PS on and off for about 15 years and I still don't feel I have come to grips with it. Probably the most powerful feature I use in Photoshop that Picasa doesn't have is layers. If you don't work with combining multiple images into the one image then you probably don't need to worry about it.
-
7th November 2009, 12:06 PM #5
There is a halfway house between Picasa and the full blown Photoshop.....it is called Photoshop Elements (also by Adobe).
Adobe Photoshop Elements 8 - reviews - Software and Services - Graphics & Publishing - PC World
Basically a cut down version of Photoshop, with about 95% of the capabilities. More than enough for even the keenest amateur, but at a fraction of the full Photoshop price.
I have an older version (Elements 5.0), which I use alongside Picasa.
I'd say only print/photo professionals need anything more than the capabilities of Photoshop Elements.
-
7th November 2009, 12:52 PM #6
Master Splinter gave a very good explanation of P/Shop.
I know of one person who knows it inside and out, all he does is P/shop retouching for adland, while the rest of us mere mortals may never know it 100%.
I've often been asked by people who like to shoot landscapes on the digital cameras as a hobby and I agree with Mr Bush, P/Shop Elements is pretty much the guts of what you need, without the $ of P/shop. Unless you have a kid in school/Uni or the like and you can get a student discount, in which case I would buy Adobe CS4 Design Premium.
-
7th November 2009, 01:51 PM #7GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Oct 2002
- Location
- NSW
- Posts
- 1,610
What about GIMP ??
There's the GIMP - GIMP is the GNU Image Manipulation Program. It is a freely distributed piece of software for such tasks as photo retouching, image composition and image authoring.
GIMP - The GNU Image Manipulation Program
It's free, and there are add-ins to make it behave very much like PhotoShop.
A Plan B would be to see if there are student editions of PS available.
Cheers,
Andrew
-
7th November 2009, 07:55 PM #8
If I wanted a really specific effect, I'd load up Terragen, load a cloud rendering routine and generate a cloudscape to my requirements.
Attached photos are entirely fake. When nature doesn't cooperate, fake it!!! (from the Terragen image gallery)
-
7th November 2009, 08:20 PM #9
Once again we're moving into the area that I have doubts about, montages and so on that deviate from what I see as the ärt"of taking good photographs. I mean, I don't mind other people doing it, and the images look great, but I just want to snap what's actually there, and make minor adjustments to overcome problems such as my brain tilt.
Thanks for the great responses everyone. Much appreciated.
-
7th November 2009, 08:30 PM #10
Picasa 3.
Hi Ross luck,
Yes definatley? Picasa 3 for me, as it can straighten out those crook Photos, takes the blur away to. I use a Canon A 520, & it has to be kept still, as it does not have that Stabiliser Gadget built in. It only has the small screen as well.
I have taken approx. 6500 photos with it & I would have 95% clarity on those Photos.
I could show you some of my Woody Pics, but I'm struggling to get them on the Screen.
Regards,
issatree.
-
8th November 2009, 05:37 PM #11
...on the other hand, you can place a polarising filter over the lens, and take a few seconds to orient it to bring out the maximum contrast in the clouds.
...on the gripping hand, another option is to take two identical exposures, one at a recommended exposure and the other underexposed by two stops, then combine them into one (some camera software already lets you merge two pics for a hi-def composite)
Pic from www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/high-dynamic-range
Similar Threads
-
Photoshop
By Sir Stinkalot in forum NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH WOODWORKReplies: 5Last Post: 26th March 2006, 07:09 PM -
Adobe Photoshop
By dazzler in forum NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH WOODWORKReplies: 9Last Post: 27th November 2005, 09:40 AM -
Another job for Photoshop?
By Johnno in forum WOODIES JOKESReplies: 0Last Post: 8th June 2005, 05:26 PM