Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Needs Pictures: 0
Picture(s) thanks: 0
Results 1 to 15 of 35
-
12th July 2009, 05:35 PM #1Awaiting Email Confirmation
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
- Northern Brisbania...
- Posts
- 791
Reversing the direction of my Belt Sander?...
My Dear Friends-in-Disaster,
I am attempting to modify my 900w Ozito Belt Sander so that it can be thrown into "reverse" by way of a secondary Switch (that would have to be DPDT), but all of my experiments thus far in the endeavour have met with less-than-satisfactory results.
As you can see from the first photo below, the motor is a simple, series-wound "Universal" device. One of the blue wires runs from the Power Trigger into one end of one of the Stator-half Coils, and then emerges at the other end of the same Stator-half as a grey wire, which feeds one of the Brushes. After travelling around the Armature coils, the current then finds its way down into the other Brush, and hence down along the other grey wire into the other Stator-half's coils, before emerging in the other blue wire which runs back to the Power Trigger. Finally, a capacitor lies in parallel across the circuit at the Power Switch...
Attachment 110508
Now, the thing is - I have tried everything that I can think of, including every combination of the following items in their normal and reversed positions:
a) Brush feeds from the Stator
b) Stator feeds from the Power Trigger
c) The Capacitor across the Power Switch (just in case it had some unmarked Polarity about it...)
The results so far are that the motor does actually run in reverse only when the Brush-feeds are switched, but only very, very roughly, and to the accompaniment of glorious sheets of flame billowing out of the side vents under the air-pressure of the cooling fan (I will actually try to take a photo if I go to the trouble of wiring everything back up again...).
So - am I missing something fundamentally simple?...
I pulled my A/C Drill apart to have a look at its setup for Reverse, and the reversing is enabled by an altogether separate Lever-Switch to the Power Trigger. There are four wires hooked up to this Lever-Switch - yes, you guessed it; the two wires from the Stator-halves, and the two wires from the Brushes. The Lever-Switch obviously just swaps over the combination of connections between the Stator-halves and the Brushes...
One small thing I have noticed that might possibly hold the key to the whole puzzle is the fact that the wires running up to the Armature coils from the Commutator are spiralled in one direction. You can see what I mean from the photo below:
Attachment 110509
Perhaps this spiralling creates a rotational torque-offset in one direction only that biases the Armature upon energisation to start spinning in one particular direction. I took my reversible Drill apart to have a look at the corresponding wires running up from its Commutator, and whilst they do spiral up, they don't seem to be quite as all one-way in the direction of their spiralling as they are in the Belt Sander. Perhaps this is the cause of the whole problem?...
Anyhow, I know there's some very clever Cookies out there! Might one of you have some ideas that might prevent the seemingly imminent and fiery demise of the otherwise innocent Ozito?
Many Thanks,
Batpig.
-
12th July 2009 05:35 PM # ADSGoogle Adsense Advertisement
- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Posts
- Many
-
12th July 2009, 06:19 PM #2
Most single direction armatures are wound in such a way that if you did reverse the stator you would get very little tourque.
Machines like sanders are single direction and the lead in the windings gives more torque in one direction.
I would say it would not be satisfactory and in such a cheap machine a waste of time.Jim Carroll
One Good Turn Deserves Another. CWS, Vicmarc, Robert Sorby, Woodcut, Tormek, Woodfast
Are you a registered member? Why not? click here to register. It's free and only takes 37 seconds!
-
12th July 2009, 07:03 PM #3
There are a couple of things involved here.
- To reverse the motor rotation, you need to reverse the mag fields greated by the armature windings relative to those produced by the stator windings. As you surmised this is done by reversing the wires at the brush holders. So why does it run rough and arc a lot when you do this?
- The armature is 'timed' i.e. the armature windings are advanced part of a segment relative to the comutator segments to maximise torque and minimise arcing. When you reverse the direction of rotation, this timing is effectively retarded instead of advanced reducing torque and increasing arcing.
Incidently, why do you want a F/R switch on belt sander?
-
12th July 2009, 07:07 PM #4
So he can back it over the line at the Belt Sander Drag Races?
(Surprisingly, the Ozito's do quite well at them. DAMHIKT. )
- Andy Mc
-
12th July 2009, 08:09 PM #5
Actually, with the flames shooting out as it is backed up, that could look quite impressive at the belt sander races. Add a rubber belt instead of a sanding belt, put some oil down, and you could smoke the tyres, too....????
-
12th July 2009, 09:09 PM #6Awaiting Email Confirmation
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
- Northern Brisbania...
- Posts
- 791
Dear Chaps,
That's it guys! It's that spiral "wind-up" of the wiring from the Commutator that you can see in the second photo of my original post...
Makes sense, too. Well, that's that then, as they say. C'est La'Vie...
Malb, I've got quite a few external mitred corners in some Skirting that I want to sand back with varying degrees of "bias" to one or the other of the two intersecting pieces in order to get them to apex at their absolute join-lines. Because I need to sand away from the corner in both directions (in order to not splinter the end of the other intersecting piece), and because I can only get the sanding belt to run out to the edge of the Sander on the non-belt-drive side (which must be pointing down to get to the bottom of the Skirting), I'd therefore like to be able to reverse the direction of the sanding belt because the belt-drive-cover must obviously always point upwards (Hope that makes sense...)
That is ultra,ultra-sharp Skew - especially as there was only three or four minutes between Malb and you!
That's pretty sharp too Splinter! You guys are Men On Fire tonight!..
Many Thanks,
Batpig.
-
12th July 2009, 11:36 PM #7
and if you do succeed in reversing the motor, you will also have to reverse the belt.
Sanding belts are designed to run only one way — it's on account of how the join is made
reversing the motor direction will likely result in a standard belt breaking within a few secondsregards from Alberta, Canada
ian
-
12th July 2009, 11:44 PM #8.
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- Perth
- Posts
- 27,793
I also used to believe that belts will break if used in reverse. I have been reversing my belts for years to clean them with that rubberised stick stuff. Now and again I'd leave them on reversed and noticed they never broke when used in this was and so I have been using them in either direction and cannot ever recall breaking one.
-
12th July 2009, 11:48 PM #9
Batpig, can you just get away using an orbital or random orbital in those tight spots?
-
13th July 2009, 01:27 AM #10Electrician
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
- Thailand
- Age
- 62
- Posts
- 192
The direction of Universal "series" motors can be reversed.
You can do this by swapping the leads to the armature or the magnetic fields but not both.
The reason why you are seeing lots of sparks when the motor is reversed is because the brushes are "going against their grain". If you run the motor in reverse for a long period of time & preferably with a load, the sparks will soon disappear. After you've done this, it would be advisable to "clean" the commutator with a piece of fine grade emery cloth, until the commutator is shiny. When you've done this, give it a wipe over with a clean rag soaked in alcohol (to remove the filings).“I do not think there is any thrill that can go through the human heart like that felt by the inventor as he sees some creation of the brain unfolding to success... Such emotions make a man forget food, sleep, friends, love, everything.” - Nikola Tesla.
-
13th July 2009, 02:56 AM #11.
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- Victoria
- Posts
- 5,215
Same here. Reversing the belt gives you more "sharp" grit, so you get an extra 15-20% life out of it. And they have never broken on me either. Its the way to go. And when sanding tops etc, I hold my sander back to front and sand into the belts direction, much like a drum sander. I get better results that way.
-
13th July 2009, 08:48 AM #12Awaiting Email Confirmation
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
- Northern Brisbania...
- Posts
- 791
Dear Guys,
As you would well know, that is definitely doable within a few seconds Ian.
Maybe Claw, maybe... But the "action" is not uniquely in the preferred direction away from the external corners. But Beggars can't be Choosers, as they say. A straight Orbital would be the better of the two you suggest, because the edge of the backing-plates are straight and usually made of metal, compared to the more vulnerable round rubber that is on the bottom of my Mak ROS.
I know what you're saying El', and I have persevered a bit to see whether the spark situation in reverse has been abating, but I do think that the pronounced spiral wind-up of the Armature leads mentioned previously is a dominant and limiting factor. I have noticed that my Drill is both a little slower, as well as a little "sparkier", in reverse, and it doesn't even have as much "wind-up" in the leads to the coils that are running from its Commutator as the Sander has. I'm playing it by ear, though. I have to be careful that I don't melt the Sander's housing before I "bed" its brushes into reverse-direction use...
Many Thanks everyone,
Batpig.
-
13th July 2009, 07:21 PM #13
I had a fair bit of time as a metal polisher working with belts up to150mm wide x 3.6m long in a wide variety of grits and abrasive. Most of these belts are marked with an arrow to indicate run direction, but this optional rather than essential.
In metal polishing, the belt is swapped frequently as you work through the belt grades, and the arrow helps to ensure that you mount the belt in the same direction as it previously was, or conversely in the opposite direction. Why? To get max life from a belt you run it through a fair portion of it usefull life in one direction, then once it starts to 'go off'' , reversing the rotation gives access to the back edges of the abrasive grains, and extends belt life by about 35 to 40% over single direction only use.
Probably saw an average of one belt actually break out of maybe 150 worked to death in a week, but these were normally due to to the belt snagging or being cut by the workpiece, rather than the joint failing. Quite interesting to see a 3.6m belt thrash itself to death driven by a 5HP motor with people trying to dodge the flying strands and stop the machine.
-
13th July 2009, 08:49 PM #14SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Posts
- 686
Hi Batpig,
COming from a former industrial engineer, while it's possible to reverse direction of the motor, the threads on all the shafts, etc... are designed to tighten under load.
It's probable that if you reverse the direction of the motor, you'll start undoing things unintentionally.
That is, unless every connection is splined/keyed into place.
Cheers,
eddie
-
14th July 2009, 12:38 AM #15Tool collector
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Location
- Santpoort-Zuid, Netherlands
- Age
- 67
- Posts
- 462
Hi Michael,
you'll wreck the sander for sure, so don't attempt this. The optimisation of the armature coils and the resulting magnetic field, which is rendered into a time-lag when used in reverse, is mentioned as an argument against doing this several times in the other posts, and rightly so. But all other things go in reverse too, like the drive train, the belt system, the cooling air flow and the dust suction fan.
For instance, when you look at the cooling fan mounted on the armature, you see the blades curved in a certain way. That means they are optimised for scooping the air from the direction of the commutator and the rotor coils towards the fan itself. Run in reverse, curved blades only produce a fraction of the designed and calculated airflow. Forthermore, the air is supposed to first cool the commutator and then the coils. If the air is heated up after passing the coils, the commutator will run too hot and there is already much more sparking then this system was designed for in the first place.
As for the sanding belt run in reverse, think of a chain saw run in reverse. Normally the chain is drawn through the wood by the motor driven sprocket. Only the blade's bottom part and the sprocket take the strain. The blade's top part and the star wheel in front are meant to guide the chain round and back to the sawing process again. Experienced users are seen to use the blade's top part as well, to saw little branches from felled trees in very quick expert movements. But they know that the machine can not take too much strain this way, because the pulling force is transfered from the sprocket to the star wheel, which has a very flimsy to an almost non-existing bearing system.
On a belt sander run in reverse, the pulling takes place at the upper belt part and the pulling strain on the sanding bottom part of the belt sander is transfered from the hind rubber coated drive roller to the front guide roller. This roller has a decent bearing system and it can take this strain, and traction from the hind roller will take place just as good whith this roller as an inbetween. But the guide roller has a steering function, taking care of the proper belt track. With pulling force on this steering roller, the belt tracking will probably go wrong very quickly and adjusting will be very finnicky.
In reverse the dust will not be drawn away at the back by the suction fan, but spewed out from underneath the belt at the front. The fan itself will not work properly, either. Centrifugal fans do not blow instead of suck when rotated in reverse, but the shape of their enclosure determines that their designed efficiency works in one direction only. Run the other way, the displaced amount of air may be 30% or less of nominal output.
The drive train is probably a toothed belt as a primary step, and a set of gears as a secondary step to drive the hind roller. The toothed belt will run fine in both directions, in worst case a pulley may loosen itself when there is a thread involved for fixing or securing. The gears, however, may be ground helical. There is always a slight axial thrust component generated by helical systemes, which is absorbed by some of the bearings. This axial thrust will point in opposite direction when such gears run in reverse, which may be harmful -or not. I don't know your type and make of machine, so i can't determine if it is or if it ain't..
Sanding belts are cut from large rolls of fortified linen strips, carrying sprinkled and glued abrasive grains. At both ready cut glue joints of a length of strip, the grains are rubbed off, in order to have a dependable adhesive contact between fabric and fabric. The fabric overlaps on this joint and the inside overlap must point in the rotating direction of the belt. When the rubber coated drive roller pulls at the joint, the overlap will take the strain without fraying, when pointing in the right direction. With the belt mounted the wrong way, the pulling rubber of the drive roller may peel off the glued overlap bit by bit at every loop pass, which may eventually make the sanding belt snap or tear. So there's more involved than just a reversing switch, running in reverse also means having to mount the belt in reverse.
And than there's the base plate, which is often a heat treated steel plate or some sort of graphite coated fabric. It is fixed at the leading edge only, to allow heat expansion and shrinkage at the trailing edge. With the sanding belt running in reverse, a graphite coated piece of fabric would just crumple and tear loose. But with a steel plate, the belt could snag behind its loose trailing edge, with sure damage to the belt and plate and possible damage to your health. Since the inside joint overlap of the sanding belt must point in the running direction and will collide head on with the loose trailing edge of the plate when run in reverse, chances on snagging are big.
So, all in all, as said in the other contributions above, the disadvantages vastly outnumber the advantage, so do not invest in the effort.
greetings!
gerhard
Similar Threads
-
D2 Steel: Sharpening, belt sander - belt comparison.
By Groggy in forum SHARPENINGReplies: 19Last Post: 3rd February 2008, 08:06 PM