Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 23 of 23
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    27,792

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Old Hilly View Post
    One needs to balance the friction demands of the flat-topped depth gauge with the decreases in performance from not lowering the depth gauges. Probably the answer is something more complex but perhaps doing something, even if it isn't quite enough, is better than doing nothing at all?
    True, but surely it's better to set the rakers to the optimised depth to start with ?

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #17
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    489

    Default

    Yes BobL, you are right, the rakers need to be set at their correct depth and with luck the combination tools I just bought will do that. This being the June long weekend on the mid-north coast the weather should start to clear late this afternoon and Monday it will be fine, by Tuesday the ground will be dry enough to walk on without getting too muddy and I can get back to cleaning up the mess after the fire so that rebuilding can commence. As the rakers wear down I can just round off the leading edges to reduce friction and reduce the chiseling effect a sharp, square edge would present to the timber being cut. As to optimising the raker depth to the timber being cut, well, that's going to be a problem for me as the saw has to cut all sorts of timber. At the moment it's mainly Aust. Hardwoods, Ironbark, Tallowood, Greygum, Turpentine etc. In another month or so it will be Paulownia with a bit of treated Pine mixed in for variety and to be honest I don't really have the confidence to keep increasing the depth of cut for each type of timber. What happens if I go too far of if the depths vary? At this stage I just need to clear up the mess and get on with rebuilding what we lost, perhaps then I can experiment a little.
    Thanks for the advice, BobL. I may be in a position to do some experimenting next year.

  4. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    27,792

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Old Hilly View Post
    As to optimising the raker depth to the timber being cut, well, that's going to be a problem for me as the saw has to cut all sorts of timber. At the moment it's mainly Aust. Hardwoods, Ironbark, Tallowood, Greygum, Turpentine etc. In another month or so it will be Paulownia with a bit of treated Pine mixed in for variety and to be honest I don't really have the confidence to keep increasing the depth of cut for each type of timber. What happens if I go too far of if the depths vary? .
    The saw can stay pretty much constant as it's only the chain (and the drive sprocket)that needs to be varied.

    In practice here is how I work.
    I keep a couple of loops with higher rakers for harder/wider wood and just one with lower rakers for softer/narrower woods as I don't cut much of this.
    It's not an exclusive operation , a chain that cuts harder/wider wood will still cut softer/narrower wood, just a bit slower.
    If I know what I'm going to cut I will prep the saw beforehand with the sprocket and chain suited to the wood.
    In the field I make a small adjustments e.g. if the wood is soft I'll be using the lower raker chain and if I sense the wood is extra soft I will knock a bit more off the rakers next time I touch up, i.e. after the next tank.
    It depends what's and how much is being cut, the lower raker chain will easier cut hard wood if the wood is narrow enough so I won't swap chains/sprockets to do that if there's not much to cut.

    I also have the added problem of having 10 saws with about twice that number of bars of different lengths, gauges and pitches.
    In practice I use 4 bars mainly on two saws, a 24" and 25" on the 70cc saw, and a 42 and 60" on a 120cc saw. so I usually have ~8 chains and 4 sprockets with me when I go cutting. I carry a fairly extensive tool kit with me.

    This is my chain case for the long chains
    newcase2.jpg

    I had bars hanging up everywhere in the shed until I made this box.
    Boxopen2.jpg

  5. #19
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    489

    Default

    Progress report, sort of. It's been raining here on the Mid North Coast but I made it back to the ruins with the Stihl filing gadgets and sharpened a chain that was new one tank of fuel ago. The flat file took a small amount of material off the rakers, just enough that you could see file marks on the top of the tooth. The ground was too soft and slippery to work safely so the saw stayed in the container awaiting some sunshine. I like the Stihl concept, it's a bit pricey but if it does the job and sharpens the chain properly then it's cheap.
    And thank you BobL, for your contribution to the discussion, I am in awe of your knowledge and practical experience.

  6. #20
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    North of the coathanger, Sydney
    Age
    68
    Posts
    9,417

    Default

    so how does the tooth profile change if filed for a rip cut?
    regards
    Nick
    veni, vidi,
    tornavi
    Without wood it's just ...

  7. #21
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    27,792

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sawdust Maker View Post
    so how does the tooth profile change if filed for a rip cut?
    The primary change is with the top plate filing angle.
    For cross cutting this angle is usually between 25 - 35º
    For milling it's usually around 10º.
    It will actually work at 0º but as it impossible to be sure if it's not slightly less than zero which could lead to a jammed chain its better to stay clearly on the positive side of zero.

    Screen Shot 2017-06-12 at 8.26.25 AM.png

  8. #22
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    489

    Default

    Just a brief update on the Sthil hand filing jig, it certainly seems to work. I have been giving the chain a quick sharpen on each tank of fuel and each time I sharpen there is a slight indication that material has been removed from the rakers. The chain is certainly cutting well, the saw is working moderately hard and the sawdust is mostly chips rather than powder so I am happy.

  9. #23
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    27,792

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Old Hilly View Post
    Just a brief update on the Sthil hand filing jig, it certainly seems to work. I have been giving the chain a quick sharpen on each tank of fuel and each time I sharpen there is a slight indication that material has been removed from the rakers. The chain is certainly cutting well, the saw is working moderately hard and the sawdust is mostly chips rather than powder so I am happy.
    Its good to hear its working. If you want to, and have nothing better to do, you could post a side-on close up pic of one of your filed cutters (like I did on the previous page) and I will give you a diagnostic. I do this for a lot of folks on the Arborist site.

    OTOH if you just want cut wood then go for it!.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Saw sharpening file holder.
    By planemaker in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWERED
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 30th August 2013, 12:55 AM
  2. Chainsaw Sharpening Jig
    By Morbius in forum SHARPENING
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 25th July 2013, 01:22 PM
  3. Chainsaw sharpening
    By TEEJAY in forum SMALL TIMBER MILLING
    Replies: 76
    Last Post: 8th January 2012, 09:36 PM
  4. Chainsaw sharpening
    By dakotax3 in forum HAND TOOLS - POWERED
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 20th August 2010, 04:38 PM
  5. Backyard slabbing and File-o-plate sharpening
    By Sigidi in forum SMALL TIMBER MILLING
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 11th August 2009, 11:13 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •