Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 51

Thread: Rakers

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Cedarton
    Posts
    4,905

    Default Rakers

    Bought 2 new skip tooth chains(Oregon 27rx) the other day and they are both leaving a very average cutting profile,eg,corrugated..one was sharpened at 10*,the other at 15*,the tops of the rakers are shiny,and to me appear too high,however the bloke at the chainsaw shop where they were sharpened,said to me that the rakers should never be touched ...will high rakers cause the cut to be corrugated?..something is not right ,help muchly appreciated..MM
    Mapleman

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    27,795

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MAPLEMAN View Post
    Bought 2 new skip tooth chains(Oregon 27rx) the other day and they are both leaving a very average cutting profile,eg,corrugated..one was sharpened at 10*,the other at 15*,the tops of the rakers are shiny,and to me appear too high,however the bloke at the chainsaw shop where they were sharpened,said to me that the rakers should never be touched ...will high rakers cause the cut to be corrugated?..something is not right ,help muchly appreciated..MM
    Raker depths are not a fixed quantity and depend on things like saw power, chain speed, cutting with and wood hardness.
    As a guide, for aussie hardwoods they should be ~10% of the gullet width but in softwoods it would not be unusual to use 15-17% of gullet width..
    e.g. new 3/8 chain has a gullet width of ~0.25" so the raker depth should be 0.025"
    Some of my old chains where the cutter has just about gone have gullets of around 0.45" and raker depths are thus 0.045"

    Corrugations (or Washboard) have very little to do with rakers.
    In the picture below two cuts done one after the other - the cut on the left was done first then the cut on the right - same log, same saw, same chain but with a two file strokes per cutter touchup in between the two cuts.
    The main difference between the two cuts was the WIDTH of the cut. The LHS one being ~400mm and the RHS one being ~500 mm

    Corrugations appear to be caused by some sort of a synchronisation between the forward cutting speed and the sideways chain speed where a cutting cutter enters and grabs wood just as the bar moves on.
    I rarely see this effect on wide cuts and I see it more often with skip chain in softer, esp. sap, wood.


    Rakers-c0ntrast-jpg
    Attached Images Attached Images

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Gatton, Qld
    Age
    48
    Posts
    3,064

    Default

    MM, rakers too low will give aggressive finish, not too high. But top plate angle of 15 deg will give more aggressive finish as compared to 10 deg. Having said that 15 deg isn't a 'bad' finish. You may find hook angle is extreme, that combined with a nice 10 deg top plate angle will give aggressive finish
    I love my Lucas!! ...just ask me!
    Allan.

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Cedarton
    Posts
    4,905

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sigidi View Post
    MM, rakers too low will give aggressive finish, not too high. But top plate angle of 15 deg will give more aggressive finish as compared to 10 deg. Having said that 15 deg isn't a 'bad' finish. You may find hook angle is extreme, that combined with a nice 10 deg top plate angle will give aggressive finish
    Cheers Alan...the blokes at the shop were sharpening one chain at 35* when i went to collect them,they were astounded that i wanted them done at 10*..i checked rakers out again,i think they could well be too low,this would explain the corrugation,as you mentioned..will sharpen chains myself today and report if there is an improvement in cutting profile..should have bought them directly from Lucas ..MM
    Mapleman

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Cedarton
    Posts
    4,905

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BobL View Post
    Raker depths are not a fixed quantity and depend on things like saw power, chain speed, cutting with and wood hardness.
    As a guide, for aussie hardwoods they should be ~10% of the gullet width but in softwoods it would not be unusual to use 15-17% of gullet width..
    e.g. new 3/8 chain has a gullet width of ~0.25" so the raker depth should be 0.025"
    Some of my old chains where the cutter has just about gone have gullets of around 0.45" and raker depths are thus 0.045"

    Corrugations (or Washboard) have very little to do with rakers.
    In the picture below two cuts done one after the other - the cut on the left was done first then the cut on the right - same log, same saw, same chain but with a two file strokes per cutter touchup in between the two cuts.
    The main difference between the two cuts was the WIDTH of the cut. The LHS one being ~400mm and the RHS one being ~500 mm

    Corrugations appear to be caused by some sort of a synchronisation between the forward cutting speed and the sideways chain speed where a cutting cutter enters and grabs wood just as the bar moves on.
    I rarely see this effect on wide cuts and I see it more often with skip chain in softer, esp. sap, wood.


    Rakers-c0ntrast-jpg
    Cheers Bob for all that info..MM
    Mapleman

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Cedarton
    Posts
    4,905

    Default

    Spoke to the lucas team this morning,and they were very helpful in trying to sort out my plight...will attack the milling again tomorrow and see how things pan out..MM
    Mapleman

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Gatton, Qld
    Age
    48
    Posts
    3,064

    Default

    MM, have you got yourself a file o plate? Quick easy and best thing for working the rakers back, even if your chain is cutting bad it will bring it back.
    I love my Lucas!! ...just ask me!
    Allan.

  9. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Cedarton
    Posts
    4,905

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sigidi View Post
    MM, have you got yourself a file o plate? Quick easy and best thing for working the rakers back, even if your chain is cutting bad it will bring it back.
    I think i have one somewhere buried ..if not,will get lucas to send me one..MM
    Mapleman

  10. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Nerang Queensland
    Age
    66
    Posts
    10,766

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sigidi View Post
    MM, have you got yourself a file o plate? Quick easy and best thing for working the rakers back, even if your chain is cutting bad it will bring it back.
    I don't have one but based on the U-Tube videos, I took it only works on standard chains, as it uses the following tooth to line it up. For skip chains it wouldn't be of any use, or am I not understanding how it works?
    Neil
    ____________________________________________
    Every day presents an opportunity to learn something new

  11. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    27,795

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dai sensei View Post
    I don't have one but based on the U-Tube videos, I took it only works on standard chains, as it uses the following tooth to line it up. For skip chains it wouldn't be of any use, or am I not understanding how it works?
    It works on skip chains OK - it doesn't actually need the following cutter to align itself as it hooks itself onto the raker and the other end can just ride on the chain.

    I've only used a fileoplate a few times and find that they do not lower the rakers anywhere near enough, especially for softer woods.

  12. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Brookfield, Brisbane
    Posts
    5,800

    Default

    tehy do when you modify them bob, just gota take a bit more out where the plate sits on teh chain. easily done with a grinder

    www.carlweiss.com.au
    Mobile Sawmilling & Logging Service
    8" & 10" Lucas Mills, bobcat, 4wd tractor, 12 ton dozer, stihl saws.

  13. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Gatton, Qld
    Age
    48
    Posts
    3,064

    Default

    They have two settings, one much higher than the other, I figure the one which lowers the rakes the least, hole 'A' is used for hardwood and the one that lowers rakers the most, hole 'B' would be for softwood.

    When/if you get one make sure you get one for 404 chain
    I love my Lucas!! ...just ask me!
    Allan.

  14. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Nerang Queensland
    Age
    66
    Posts
    10,766

    Default

    Is this what we are talking about?

    C65957 Carlton File O Plate 404 Pitch 063 080 | eBay
    Neil
    ____________________________________________
    Every day presents an opportunity to learn something new

  15. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    27,795

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dai sensei View Post
    Is this what we are talking about?

    C65957 Carlton File O Plate 404 Pitch 063 080 | eBay
    Yep - that looks like one of the older ones.

    I took mine out and had a play with it today. As Carl says they can be made more aggressive with an angle grinder but looking at the geometry and operation of the FOP it would need to be constantly modified during the life of a chain to maintain a constant raker angle. But this would then mean that they would then set the rakers too aggressively for a new chain.

    When doing the rakers with an FOP, the way I see it is that there are two contact points, the top of the cutter, and the other end is the slot that sits on top of the chain ties. As the cutter wears the contact point on top of the cutter drops which exposes more raker so that it can be filed off. However the distance between the raker and the top of the cutter increases and makes then raker angle shallower which is undesirable since it does not allow the cutter to grab the wood in the same way it did when it was new.

    In the diagram blow the blue line shows the angle at which an FOP would sit on a new cutter/raker.
    The green line shows the angle the FOP will sit on a well used cutter, showing a significant amount of raker will be removed BUT the green line is not the same angle as the blue line.
    To maintain the same raker angle between new and well used cutters, what is really needed is for the FOP to sit at the orange line i.e. Orange and blue are at the same angle.
    The orange line removes significantly more raker than the green line so the chain will keep cutting as good as when it was new.

    When ever I show this method to experienced chainsaw operators all over the world they initially think it is way too extreme (yep there is stuff all raker left on an old cutter) but everyone I know that tries this method never goes back to their old ways because it allows them to keep using their chains cutting as good as when it new throughout the life a chain.
    Rakers-rakers4-jpg

    The Oregon raker guides are a bit of a klutz but I noticed a couple of years ago that they do at least come in a range of raker depth settings, with increments of 0.005" i.e. 0.025', 0.030, 0.035, 0.040, 0.045 etc.
    This means you would need a set of these the raker tools but at least the rakers can be set to the nearest 0.005".
    One way to do this would be to measure the gullet and then select the guide that is closest to 1/10th of the the gullet, e.g. if the gullet was between 0.38 and 0.42" thne select the 0.040" guide.

    I went through all this back in 2009 on the Arborisite - it's a pity they lost all the pictures otherwise I would have just posted a link.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  16. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Cedarton
    Posts
    4,905

    Default

    Are the rakers factory set when new? I did request the chain be sharpened,and rakers set, when i ordered the chains new,and when i picked them up,assumed they were..unfortunately,after 2 sharpens,they are still corrugating the surface ..MM
    Mapleman

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. chain cutters rakers etc
    By pjt in forum SMALL TIMBER MILLING
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: 4th February 2010, 06:35 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •