Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 17
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Bendigo
    Posts
    776

    Default timber yield in finished piece of work

    This may or may not be of interest, but me being an old accountant found it so.

    Was finishing up a piece the other day and wondered just how much of the original dimensioned timber ended up in the item, worked it out and was about 50%

    Set me thinking - how much of the original rough lumber got to dimensioned status? A bit over 50%

    that set me thinking more, recalled back to my young days doing stats in the sawmill in NQ, about 50% of the log by volume ended up as rough lumber.

    And that set me thinking again, my calculation is that roughly 50% of the volume of that original tree in the forest ends up delivered to the mill.

    So 50% of 50% of 50% of 50% is - WHAT THE HECK? - yes, a miserable 6% or so of that tree, and so the carbon, perilous carbon that we are wont to agonise over, is locked up in my end product.

    Blimey, that's scary. Hope my calculations are wrong

    I hope everyone else is way more 'yield efficient' than me too

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Sunbury, Vic
    Age
    84
    Posts
    2,717

    Default

    At least your calculation is near enough to correct,
    Tom

    "It's good enough" is low aim

  4. #3
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Bendigo
    Posts
    776

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chesand View Post
    At least your calculation is near enough to correct,
    Darn, was hoping I was totally wrong.

    Now I'm depressed

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    near Mackay
    Age
    59
    Posts
    4,634

    Default

    Yes, I would say your calculations are pretty close alright.
    When I was milling with my chainsaw mill, my '404 chain would turn 8mm of timber to sawdust every cut, if I was milling 32mm slabs, that meant 20% of the log would end up as sawdust. Then you would lose the flitches unless you had a use for them, and there was always wastage at the centre of the log, those could account for another 30% loss, so there's your 50% straight up. Then drying would lose a bit more with cracks and any warpage, then thicknessing you would lose more, yes depressing to think about it.
    ​Brad.

  6. #5
    Mobyturns's Avatar
    Mobyturns is offline In An Instant Your Life Can Change Forever
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    "Brownsville" Nth QLD
    Age
    66
    Posts
    4,428

    Default

    Incredible, I was only discussing this subject with my chemist an hour or so ago as she watched as I signed off the scripts with one of my segmented pens. I said to her that most people do not appreciate the amount of work involved to produce the finished item and the volume of wood actually used to make such a small item.
    Mobyturns

    In An Instant Your Life CanChange Forever

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Melbourne, Vic, Australia
    Posts
    1,255

    Default

    Wow. Also, do most people factor 50% wastage for typical furniture making? I've never really paid that much attention but always figured about 40% on top for something like a dining table to cover jointing/thicknessing, cutting to length, defects etc. But if it's closer to 100% extra then that would really make it difficult to be profitable if making something to sell.

    Cheers, Dom

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Caroline Springs, VIC
    Posts
    1,645

    Default

    I have very little offcut waste when producing anything. I would factor in 100mm of waste per rough stick. If the stick is 1000mm long, I've lost 10%. If the stick is 6meters long, well happy days because I've only lost ummm...1.6% sounds about right.

  9. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    1,768

    Default

    I try to as much as I can. Good machine setups eliminate snipe on most machines. Regular size off cuts are further processed into other products. Even down to using small pieces for jewellery like earrings and brooches. Anything but throwing it in the bin. I do a drink coaster, a bottle opener, my Book Birds, bangles, rings, pendants all from a natural offcut from the production of the stool I make. From a batch of stools, one of the aforesaid products gets made. When I make my Book Birds from figured timbers I make hearts that I either sell finished or unfinished ( there is demand for unfinished, i kid you not), or turn them into pendants, earrings, brooches and jewellery sets. I get quite good money for stuff that most would bin.

    I generally have less than 50mm more than I need in terms of length. Take 2 3.5s off that and divide by two. That is my waste. Sounds cocky maybe but snipe can be eliminated on most machines, including lunch box thicknessers.

    Don’t throw it away, give it away, use it or sell it. The stuff is just far too valuable.
    There ain't no devil, it's just god when he's drunk!!

    Tom Waits

  10. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    near Mackay
    Age
    59
    Posts
    4,634

    Default

    Well yes, if you are buying dried boards cut and dressed near to the size you need, sure you can minimise your own wastage. But there has been wastage to get that board to you at the milling and drying stages of the process . There is no doubt about that.
    ​Brad.

  11. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Melbourne, Vic, Australia
    Posts
    1,255

    Default

    None of my off-cuts are wasted...they go into my wood-fired pizza oven to make delicious pizza . That highly-figured, super-dense Australian hardwood sure does burn nice and clean . So 0% waste on the off-cuts haha.

    Cheers,

    Dom

  12. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Strathalbyn South Australia
    Posts
    1,141

    Default

    Let’s just all start building log cabins then, still wastage but possibly the lest amount [emoji16]

  13. #12
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Bendigo
    Posts
    776

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DomAU View Post
    Wow. Also, do most people factor 50% wastage for typical furniture making? I've never really paid that much attention but always figured about 40% on top for something like a dining table to cover jointing/thicknessing, cutting to length, defects etc. But if it's closer to 100% extra then that would really make it difficult to be profitable if making something to sell.

    Cheers, Dom
    Well the thinking there is slightly different. For example, say I want to make a table top 900 x 2000, I'll use 200 mm boards so want 10 metres of 200mm material, so get 5 x 2.4 boards just to be safe, want to ensure the ends are clean, allow for snipe and the like, joint, plane and finally rip cut them to 180 widths each too. Say I use 5 quarter and intend on getting 25 mm final thickness.

    The end result is 5x32x200x2400 down to 5x25x180x2000 which is a volume yield of 59%, better than my generalised 50%, but tabletops are probably the at the top end of yield. As for pricing, don't fret, just keep pricing the way you do, but don't tell the world that we woodworkers aren't really saving the planet

    By the way, if you talk surface area of the timber, ignoring the thicknessing, this scenario works out to about the 40% you mention Dom.

  14. #13
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Bendigo
    Posts
    776

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cal View Post
    Let’s just all start building log cabins then, still wastage but possibly the lest amount [emoji16]
    Bugger, I'm too old and weak to be lifting logs now

    Good one Cal

  15. #14
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Bendigo
    Posts
    776

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domau View Post
    none of my off-cuts are wasted...they go into my wood-fired pizza oven to make delicious pizza :u. That highly-figured, super-dense australian hardwood sure does burn nice and clean . So 0% waste on the off-cuts haha.

    Cheers,

    dom
    love it

  16. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Melbourne
    Age
    34
    Posts
    6,127

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DomAU View Post
    Wow. Also, do most people factor 50% wastage for typical furniture making? I've never really paid that much attention but always figured about 40% on top for something like a dining table to cover jointing/thicknessing, cutting to length, defects etc. But if it's closer to 100% extra then that would really make it difficult to be profitable if making something to sell.

    Cheers, Dom
    We'll generally order 10% over the total lm needed or, for table tops, +2 full boards to allow for unusable ones.

    Waste can be dictated by what the client orders; I've had to make table tops that are specified at 55 or 60mm thick, which means we have to buy 75mm stock and send 25% of it straight into the dust extractor. Same deal for tops finishing at 40mm, buy 50mm and dress 20% off. If we have to cut 3mm solid edging for veneered board we lose over 60%: 4mm for the saw and another 1mm for sanding

    It can also be dictated by what our suppliers send us. A common one for us is bed rails that finish at 120mm wide. We order 150mm boards, but what's delivered is anything from 150-200 wide depending on what they have in stock; a 30-50mm offcut is generally usable, anything under that is firewood. Or you might lose 5mm in thickness and 10-20mm in width just straightening a board.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Crack in finished piece
    By toddbron in forum WOODTURNING - GENERAL
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 12th March 2012, 08:20 PM
  2. Killing bugs in finished piece
    By Paul39 in forum WOODTURNING - GENERAL
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 19th July 2010, 01:15 PM
  3. My first finished piece...
    By Wongdai in forum WOODWORK PICS
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 28th December 2008, 06:44 PM
  4. work piece support
    By davmar in forum TRITON / GMC
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 27th August 2008, 06:47 AM
  5. Asking for someone to produce a piece of work - acceptable?
    By Manaz in forum FORUMS INFO, HELP, DISCUSSION & FEEDBACK
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 7th October 2007, 06:48 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •