Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 48
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Millmerran,QLD
    Age
    73
    Posts
    11,129

    Default

    I have just checked the 1895 catalogue to see where these lookalikes are in their respective hierarchies. Prices are for a 26" saw per dozen (I have always presumed these were trade catalogues as few people would have bought twelve at a time ) :

    Richardson

    No.9 $24 (lookalike)
    No.12 $30
    No.13 $33

    Woodrough & McParlin's

    No.12 $32 (lookalike)
    No.60 $35

    Harvey W Peace

    No.60 $30 (lookalike)
    No.P70 $33 (straight back)
    No.P70 $33 (hollow back)

    Regards
    Paul
    Bushmiller;

    "Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts, absolutely!"

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Age
    2010
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #32
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    San Antonio, Texas, USA
    Posts
    3,070

    Default

    Hi Paul,

    My work schedule has become a somewhat slower and more routine which has allowed me a little time for saw stuff.

    I've measured the hardness of that Simonds No. 5 and it's nothing special. HRC 48.16 with a S.D. of 0.5 compared to the Disston No. 12 dataset average of HRC 52.19 with S.D. 0.172. Still updating, auditing and double checking my worksheet (154 saws now) but the Simonds No. 5 was just a look-alike of the Disston No. 12, nothing more.

    Now to try to find the copies made by the other manufacturers you listed above.

    Regards,
    Rob
    Innovations are those useful things that, by dint of chance, manage to survive the stupidity and destructive tendencies inherent in human nature.

  4. #33
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,503

    Default

    I can confirm that this is not a #12
    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ddBivRJlEvU

  5. #34
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Millmerran,QLD
    Age
    73
    Posts
    11,129

    Default

    Gavin

    Without realising it I think you have solved one of the perennial hand saw mysteries. The hole in the toe of the saw. It is in case you wish to become a saw musician as by the simple addition of a handle you have a musical saw. However, if you have one of these dual purpose saws be very careful to play the right side (smooth side) or else you are going to go through a lot of bows!

    Regards
    Paul
    Bushmiller;

    "Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts, absolutely!"

  6. #35
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,503

    Default

    I notice that the Sandvik Stradivarius Saw is toothed but doesn't have a hole for a handle.
    https://www.amazon.com/BAHCO-296-Str.../dp/B002IB1C6K
    Does the toothing affect the sound?
    Would a #12 sound better than a #120?

  7. #36
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Millmerran,QLD
    Age
    73
    Posts
    11,129

    Default

    I have no idea (about many things) but I particularly looked at the saw the young lady was playing and noticed it was smooth both sides. I think the musical saws I've seen in the past have had a tooth line, but probably unsharpened. It would be interesting to see if Rob Streeper could obtain one to conduct a hardness test for comparison.

    I also think that the handle is her modification to make bending to the "S" shape easier. I once saw a Simonds musical saw up for grabs and I put a brake on my addiction. If one came up again I would be interested for the curiosity angle.

    Regards
    Paul

  8. #37
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Armadale Perth WA
    Age
    55
    Posts
    4,524

    Default

    This is wider inside the grip, like a Wheeller, Madden & Clemson or suchlike ...


  9. #38
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Armadale Perth WA
    Age
    55
    Posts
    4,524

    Default

    That Daryl Weir bloke posted some photos he saved from ebay of a #12 'Disston and Sons' ... with a different, but presumably original, handle.
    Cheers,
    Paul McGee

    #12 special.jpg
    Attached Images Attached Images

  10. #39
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Millmerran,QLD
    Age
    73
    Posts
    11,129

    Default

    Paul

    That's a rather special No.12 with the cone head saw screws and no medallion. I am guessing it is very early. The finesse displayed in the handle is particularly noticeable to my mind.

    Regards
    Paul
    Bushmiller;

    "Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts, absolutely!"

  11. #40
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Millmerran,QLD
    Age
    73
    Posts
    11,129

    Default

    Paul

    The Disstonian Institute shows pictures of a similar saw and two catalogue entries of 1876 and 1890 ( the latter surprisingly as Disston saws had medallions well before this time) with the raised saw screws and no medallion. With the keystone etch and scales of justice the saw has to be post 1873. The No.12 dates from around 1860 through to 1927. It morphed into the D-12 for 1928.

    Regards
    Paul

    Edit: Disstonian Institute does not show the same saw! Daryl Weir's pix show a saw with a lambs tongue! It still looks good and authentic too.
    Bushmiller;

    "Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts, absolutely!"

  12. #41
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    San Antonio, Texas, USA
    Posts
    3,070

    Default

    I remember there being a patent from the 1870's or so showing and covering the truncated cone screws, I'll see if I can find it.
    Innovations are those useful things that, by dint of chance, manage to survive the stupidity and destructive tendencies inherent in human nature.

  13. #42
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Millmerran,QLD
    Age
    73
    Posts
    11,129

    Default

    As a matter of course I am always on the lookout for saws that replicate the No.12 and in looking through some advertisements I had saved I found another. This one wears the "Diamond Edge" brand. I suspect it was made by one of the other manufacturers (most likely Disston) as it appears in a 1910 advertisement for Norvell-Shapleigh Hardware Company of St Louis. Normally these saws branded for the store, but made by one of the big three, were medium to low range saws. This company seemed to have some top of the line saws however including a No.12 lookalike at the foot of the page.

    1910 Diamond edge[14798].jpg

    The DE165 was more expensive than a Disston No.12 of the same era. It is not clear what the finish for dark saw plate was.

    Regards
    Paul
    Bushmiller;

    "Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts, absolutely!"

  14. #43
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Knoxville
    Posts
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pmcgee View Post
    That Daryl Weir bloke posted some photos he saved from ebay of a #12 'Disston and Sons' ... with a different, but presumably original, handle.
    Cheers,
    Paul McGee

    #12 special.jpg
    Paul,

    Those pictures I had on Facebook are actually of two different saws and not just one. Those are the only two No.12's I've seen with the cone or steeple nuts and the lambs tongue.

    Take care,
    Daryl

  15. #44
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Knoxville
    Posts
    5

    Default

    As if Geo. H. Bishop making the No.12 wasn't enough, he also made the No.99.

    DSC08334.JPGDSC08335.JPG

  16. #45
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Millmerran,QLD
    Age
    73
    Posts
    11,129

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Daryl Weir View Post
    Paul,

    Those pictures I had on Facebook are actually of two different saws and not just one. Those are the only two No.12's I've seen with the cone or steeple nuts and the lambs tongue.

    Take care,
    Daryl
    Just realised that I "thanked" on behalf of my namesake from Western Australia . He won't mind .

    Regards
    Paul
    Bushmiller;

    "Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts, absolutely!"

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •