Needs Pictures: 0
Results 1 to 15 of 25
Thread: Disston "Mine Saw"
-
8th July 2017, 09:55 AM #1GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jun 2014
- Location
- Seattle, Washington, USA
- Posts
- 1,857
Disston "Mine Saw"
I saw this listing on eBay for a Disston saw I'd never seen or heard of before:
Vintage Henry Disston & Sons RARE "Mine Saw" no.17 is 30" and 3tpi cross cut
It's, apparently, a No. 17 "Mine Saw".
As is visible in the listing, it's 30" long, with an open, metal handle which appears to have been painted or japanned at one point, and which has holes through it. The teeth are very aggressive at 3tpi, and the gullets are very deep. Based on what I can gather from this photo, I'll make the following assertions about this saw...
- The deep gullets suggest it was designed to cut green wood, and the low pitch indicates that it was likely used to cut large pieces of wood, like the beams you'd use to support the ceiling of a mine shaft.
- The giant handle indicates gloved hands
- The metal, japanned handle tells me sweat would be the norm, as would very abusive conditions (like a mine)
- The length of 30" is uncommon for a one handed crosscut saw, but it would make sense to get the longest stroke you could out of one arm. If you were cutting large beams for a mine shaft, a two man sawing team would make the most sense, but in close quarters (like a mine) you'd probably want to be more nimble
- The aggressive teeth also indicate that time would have been of the essence and little thought would be given to finish. Digging a mine and needing to support it on the fly would make this an ideal saw
Anyway, I'm just throwing out some thoughts. I figured one or two of the other saw enthusiasts may have never seen this before, so I thought it was something we could spitball about.
Interested, as always, in everyone's thoughts.
Cheers,
Luke
-
8th July 2017 09:55 AM # ADSGoogle Adsense Advertisement
- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Posts
- Many
-
8th July 2017, 01:46 PM #2SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Location
- victor harbor sa
- Posts
- 315
Hi Luke,
what a great looking saw and in such good condition.
From what I've seen in old catalogues, most of the big
manufactures made a 30" cross cut saw with metal handles,
I have the Disston 196 docking saw, which is the same length
and has the same handle, but the tooth line is heavily curved or bowed.
When I saw the tooth pattern on the #17 the first thing that
came to mind was a pit saw, ( I have a few of them also )
They have the same tooth pattern which is designed to cut
with the grain as a rip saw does, but in a more aggressive manner.
There is a good description of pit saw teeth on pg 113 in Grimshaw on saws.
So I reckon that, it is a short 30" one man rip saw, designed
to cut stock in the confines of a mine.
Graham.
-
8th July 2017, 02:11 PM #3
Luke
I think the mine saw is a variation on the docking saws. It would have been used for things such as pit props ad other rough cutting.
This is another mine saw this time with an ugly timber handle, but similar teeth.
I have just seen that Graham has jumped in with more info. I can't at this time see any references in the few Disston catalogues I have.
Regards
Paul
(Pix at the foot)Bushmiller;
"Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts, absolutely!"
-
8th July 2017, 02:53 PM #4
I saw that one too. Strange tooth profiling. I wonder if any printed matter we have access to gives any insight.
Innovations are those useful things that, by dint of chance, manage to survive the stupidity and destructive tendencies inherent in human nature.
-
8th July 2017, 05:13 PM #5Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2015
- Location
- Wonthaggi
- Posts
- 256
I might be wrong, but I think I recall reading at one time that these things were not for cutting wood. Stone maybe? Coal?
-
8th July 2017, 08:28 PM #6SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Location
- victor harbor sa
- Posts
- 315
Hi Paul,
I may be wrong (would not be the first time) but the saw you showed
looks like it started out as genuine mine saw, with the straight back
and straight tooth line, plus the etch.
But, at some time a previous owner decided to replace the handle with
one that looks like it came from a one man x-cut saw, and then also
had a go at changing the teeth to a x-cut pattern.
Is the saw at your place, that you can remove the handle to see if
there are any other holes.
And if it is at your place, what does it cut like?
Graham.
-
8th July 2017, 09:09 PM #7
Graham
The saw is not mine: Just one that I found when searching for information. I agree that the handle does not look right even allowing for the no nonsense shape of those crosscut logging saws you mention. It may well have been a replacement. Simonds at least offered docking saws with the choice of an iron or timber handle. Typically the iron handles were large: large enough to easily allow for a gloved hand. The handle on Luke's saw is identical to Disston's docking saw pattern. That does not mean it is a docking saw of course.
I have had some further thoughts on Luke's version and the tooth pattern, if it is indeed close to original, is unusual in that the teeth appear to have positive rake. No hand saw for cutting timber has that. Even rip saws have to have a few degrees of negative rake if they are to be passable. Goodvibes may well be right and it's intended use was not for timber. I don't believe it is an ice saw as the teeth were even more extreme, but there were a number of potential uses for hand saws including metal and stone.
Regards
PaulBushmiller;
"Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts, absolutely!"
-
9th July 2017, 09:45 AM #8GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jun 2014
- Location
- Seattle, Washington, USA
- Posts
- 1,857
Well one thing is for certain: This concept for a saw was not long lived.
So maybe the positive rake and super deep gullets will work in green softwoods?
-
11th July 2017, 12:33 PM #9SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Location
- victor harbor sa
- Posts
- 315
Hi Paul,
After reading your last post, I had another closer look at the tooth pattern.
In the second to last photo, if you enlarge it by say 4 times, you can see
that the front edge of each tooth does has negative rake.
It is the back edge of the tooth and deep angled gullets that give the illusion that the teeth
are leaning forward.
Other names for this tooth pattern are, gullet or briar tooth.
Graham.
-
11th July 2017, 01:34 PM #10
Graham
I think you are right and that fits in with hand saws and negative rake being virtually mandatory. I think the original saw that Luke posted is from a later era too, after Disston sold out. When I looked at the listing again I realised the seller was asking US$300. I think that might be very hopeful. I think the seller may be more au fait with axe heads than hand saws.
Regards
PaulBushmiller;
"Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts, absolutely!"
-
11th July 2017, 10:37 PM #11SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Location
- victor harbor sa
- Posts
- 315
Paul
could you please expand on why you think the saw comes from a later era.
Like you, I've not seen it in any of the old Disston catalogues or any of the
other manufactures for that matter.
Yes, the asking price is a bit on the high side, but this is the first one that I've ever seen
so it's rare to see one go up for auction, it will be interesting to see if it sells and for
how much.
Luke
what does the term spitball mean??
I'm just a dopey aussie, with a limited education in these matters.
Graham.
-
12th July 2017, 01:19 AM #12
Graham
You placed me on the spot so I had to go looking. My feelings were that the lettering on the plate was later. I found an advertisement for the Disston Docking saw, which was the No.196 which you have.
2017-07-11 23_09_23-1936 AD One 1 Man Disston.jpg - Photos.png
Then I hit pay day
Disston Mine Saw from Austin Bros.png
I had it in my library all the time. It is an advertisement from Austin Hardware in 1940, which is earlier than I thought. I didn't pick it out before because it is a small extract from a full page advert.
It would appear that the two saws were fairly similar in style and intended use. The docking saw is 18 gauge, breasted tooth line and 4 1/2ppi. The No.17 Mine saw is 16 gauge, straight tooth line and 3 1/2 ppi so a heavier duty model.
Regards
PaulBushmiller;
"Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts, absolutely!"
-
12th July 2017, 01:27 AM #13
On re-reading the advertisement I see that the Mine Saw is supposed to be "full breasted" ( At this juncture I would like to re-affirm that I am talking saws here ) but clearly the drawing shows a straight toothline. The Ebay listing shows straight unless it is another trick of the camera. After a few jointings the curvature does tend to be lost. Who knows?
Regards
PaulBushmiller;
"Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts, absolutely!"
-
12th July 2017, 10:11 AM #14GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jun 2014
- Location
- Seattle, Washington, USA
- Posts
- 1,857
-
12th July 2017, 10:31 AM #15
Luke
I hadn't heard the term spitballing before either. I wasn't quite sure what to make of that.
Funny thing with the mine saw is that the suggested uses in the advert do not include working in a mine or anything associated with underground mining.
Regards
PaulBushmiller;
"Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts, absolutely!"
Similar Threads
-
Plastic "Bung Taps" - I want to "click" a garden hose onto the end of one...?
By Batpig in forum NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH WOODWORKReplies: 4Last Post: 7th May 2017, 04:05 PM -
Why do so many "private" eBay sellers only offer "local pickup"?...
By Batpig in forum NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH WOODWORKReplies: 27Last Post: 16th July 2016, 08:57 PM -
What does "supa砥石" and "njuseramikusu" mean on a whetstone?
By Russell Cook in forum SHARPENINGReplies: 12Last Post: 26th December 2012, 02:51 PM -
eBay: How long can you "Save" the "Draft"-listing of an item you want to sell?...
By Batpig in forum NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH WOODWORKReplies: 0Last Post: 22nd January 2011, 06:04 PM -
Can anyone tell me about a Disston "ice" saw...
By pokeralice in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWEREDReplies: 4Last Post: 23rd September 2008, 02:17 AM