Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    788

    Talking Found a number 1 in the wild

    One that I could afford anyway
    Found at the local junk shop for a tenner.

    1.jpg

    About the same length as a Stanley 1 with a slightly wider iron.
    Strike buttons on the back and the toe.
    Tertius Keen and Co.
    Some internet research tells me it's a third quality Mathieson plane made in Glasgow.

    3.jpg2.jpg

    There was a slight hump on the base which was planed flat (the pic is a progress shot). The mouth didn't suffer too much.
    A bit of light cleaning to remove the obligatory white paint and general grime.

    4.jpg5.jpg

    The iron was cleaned, ground and honed. Corners were relieved. I set the cap iron close for it's first test run.
    Pic is after cleaning, but before sharpening.
    It's laminated and tapered.
    Marked Reaney R + H
    I don't know much about this maker.

    6.jpg

    Buffed with linseed oil.
    It's a bit clumsy to use one-handed, but surprisingly comfortable to use with two hands.

    7.jpg8.jpg9.jpg

    I'm generally an iron bench plane type of guy, but I was able to adjust the settings easily with the strike buttons and lateral taps on the iron.
    Very cute little plane. It's a keeper.

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    blue mountains
    Posts
    4,890

    Default

    Good find.
    Even a 3rd quality matheson should be pretty good. I have a Matheson coffin smoother and your plane looks about as well made. Only thing I can see that may make it a lesser grade is the direction of the wood grain rings being a bit skewed. May be why the sole needed a bit of a flatten but if thats all after all the time that plane has been around then not bad at all. My smoother has a pretty large mouth due to its age but still takes whisper thin shavings and is a pleasure to use. I had read about matheson having other brand names but so far yours is the first I have seen.
    Regards
    John

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Brisbane (western suburbs)
    Age
    77
    Posts
    12,127

    Default

    Good find, TT, & nice to see the old horse spruced up & put back in harness!

    Setting planes without mechanical adjusters is pretty straightforward after a bit of practice, but it's often hard to convince those wedded to screw adjuster of that. I reckon I can set up my non-screw-adjusted planes quicker than the couple I have with Norris style adjusters (except when I'm trying to show-off to someone! ).

    I've made a couple of small smoothers about the size of yours. It's a very handy size to have at times, such as when you need to work a small area with a very slight dip that the 'standard' sized smoothers just cruise over. On the one I made recently, I did find that with so little room for my hand at the back, that long blade rubbed against it quite uncomfortably after a minute or so of use. I took to the protruding edges with a diamond file & rounded them off a bit, which helped only marginally, so for the present, I've substituted a shorter block-plane blade, which makes holding it a lot better, but it's an old-style thin blade, & it doesn't have the solid feel of the thicker blade I used originally. I am tossing up whether to try making my own blade or buying a thicker LN or Veritas block plane blade....

    Cheers,
    IW

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    788

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by orraloon View Post
    My smoother has a pretty large mouth due to its age but still takes whisper thin shavings and is a pleasure to use. I had read about matheson having other brand names but so far yours is the first I have seen.
    You can make up for a largish mouth by using the cap iron set close. The plane performs well.
    I haven't really seen another Tertius.
    Interestingly there is an example (Jack) in the Museum of Applied Arts and Sciences that was used at the Sydney Observatory (they seem to have the wrong picture but it is mentioned)

    https://collection.maas.museum/object/71515


    Quote Originally Posted by IanW View Post

    Setting planes without mechanical adjusters is pretty straightforward after a bit of practice, but it's often hard to convince those wedded to screw adjuster of that. I reckon I can set up my non-screw-adjusted planes quicker than the couple I have with Norris style adjusters (except when I'm trying to show-off to someone! ).
    I'm used to setting molding planes that I use fairly regularly in my restoration work. I do like the strike buttons for the depth adjustment though.

    I've made a couple of small smoothers about the size of yours. It's a very handy size to have at times, such as when you need to work a small area with a very slight dip that the 'standard' sized smoothers just cruise over. On the one I made recently, I did find that with so little room for my hand at the back, that long blade rubbed against it quite uncomfortably after a minute or so of use. I took to the protruding edges with a diamond file & rounded them off a bit, which helped only marginally, so for the present, I've substituted a shorter block-plane blade, which makes holding it a lot better, but it's an old-style thin blade, & it doesn't have the solid feel of the thicker blade I used originally. I am tossing up whether to try making my own blade or buying a thicker LN or Veritas block plane blade....
    I read that thread with interest. Very pretty planes.
    My metal working skills are, shall we say, untested

    The plane is fairly comfortable, but I dare say it won't be used for long periods.
    I make a lot of little custom boxes for friends. I use highly figured boards and I can see this little plane could be useful.

    Cheers,
    Stu

  6. #5
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    2,357

    Default

    Stu; you may have already seen this info; OldTools Archive

    The price list shows Trade Marks for Mathieson goods of three different
    qualities.

    "For Best Quality." a crescent moon (horns up) with an eight
    pointed star

    "For Second Quality." a crescent moon with a simple cross

    "For Second Quality." "Crossmark Keen & Co., Glasgow"

    "For Third Quality." "G Tertius Keen & Co."

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    788

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by planemaker View Post
    Stu; you may have already seen this info; OldTools Archive

    The price list shows Trade Marks for Mathieson goods of three different
    qualities.

    "For Best Quality." a crescent moon (horns up) with an eight
    pointed star

    "For Second Quality." a crescent moon with a simple cross

    "For Second Quality." "Crossmark Keen & Co., Glasgow"

    "For Third Quality." "G Tertius Keen & Co."
    Thanks Stewie ...

    I visited that site during some of my research.

    I didn't mention it, but you can also clearly see the 'G' on the front. Maybe it represents Glasgow?

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Brisbane (western suburbs)
    Age
    77
    Posts
    12,127

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Thumbthumper View Post
    .......I'm used to setting molding planes that I use fairly regularly in my restoration work. I do like the strike buttons for the depth adjustment though......
    Yairs, I guess a strike button does save the tool a bit of stress. There are those as likes to really wallop their planes, judging by the number of oldies I see with severely belled blade tops! I don't like hitting my planes to release the blade, which is why I prefer to fit lever caps rather than wedges.

    I was going to comment that yours has a redundancy of buttons, hitting either the rear button or the one on the toe will loosen the wedge, so I was wondering why there would be two buttons for the same purpose on a 'cheap' plane??

    Quote Originally Posted by Thumbthumper View Post
    ...The plane is fairly comfortable, but I dare say it won't be used for long periods.....
    Yes, I imagine such planes were intended only for brief bursts of work, but it also seems to me that some toolmakers of old weren't overly concerned with user comfort. I guess the generations before us were a tougher breed & just sucked up the pain & got on with it.....

    Cheers,
    IW

  9. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Wonthaggi
    Posts
    256

    Default

    The Tertius marking is no real cause for concern. Quality gradings were a different beast 100 years ago.

    Doesn't mean it was adjudged to be substandard. More likely that it was made by an apprentice or a junior tradesman, and not by a Master Toolmaker.

    Don't ask me for a source, but one of my first coffin planes was a Tertius Keen, and I read that somewhere at the time.

    Clever pun too. Tertius. Latin for third, and Keen as in sharp.

Similar Threads

  1. 'wild' messmate
    By mrtayls in forum TIMBER
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 16th August 2010, 09:58 PM
  2. Wild Wood
    By wheelinround in forum HAVE YOUR SAY
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 13th January 2010, 04:49 PM
  3. Wild Dingo
    By Rossluck in forum NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH WOODWORK
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 25th January 2009, 11:05 PM
  4. Into the wild
    By GEEHARD in forum Links to: BOOKS, VIDEOS & PLANS
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 24th January 2009, 03:34 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •