Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Melbourne, Vic, Australia
    Posts
    1,255

    Default Lie Nielsen 112 Scraper Plane

    For Christmas I received a Lie Nielsen 112 Scraper Plane. After learning to use the chip-breaker on my smoothing plane I haven't had any issues with tear-out, but I would occasionally get dull spots on areas of vertical/reverse grain and did suffer some small tear-out on figured Mulga (super hard native - similar to Gidgee). In any case, despite several people advocating that Scraper planes are rather un-necessary I couldn't shake the feeling that I wanted to see how useful or useless they really are for myself.

    First up, I sharpened the thick blade to 8000 and tried it without turning a burr. I set the frog angle equal to the angle that gave best results by hand. I didn't like it. It left a rough finish and I actually got tear-out on some quilted blackwood that my #4 with close-set chip-breaker managed ok.

    I then turned a hook at 30 deg (I had read this somewhere - I don't remember where now) at again, was rather disappointed. I was getting shavings from the plane, however it would still leave a rough feeling surface on Blackwood, Walnut, Celery Top Pine and Tassie Oak, and I still got tear-out on figured Blackwood. I did get very good results vs a smoothing plane on some figured Mulga however. In fact it left a smooth tear-out free surface on the Mulga, whereas my #4 was creating tear-out on this piece. I resharpened and re-turned a hook a few times and got eh same results each time.

    20181226_132705R.jpg
    Blackwood

    20181226_172945R.jpg

    Mulga (cleaning up tear-out from the smoother - some still visible)

    20181226_173127R.jpg
    Mulga

    I then actually watched the Lie Nielsen Youtube instructional video and subsequently resharpened the blade and turned the hook at 90 degrees. Success! The scraper now left a nice smooth, clear, surface on Walnut, Tassie Oak, Celery Top Pine and Blackwood, with no tearout at all with or against the grain. Surprisingly, however, it now did not work as well on the piece of Mulga that it was doing a great job on with the hook at 30 degrees. I assume from this very brief initial playing around that a different angle of the hook is required for optimal results on different timber? That is, much harder timber would benefit from a lower hook angle (which would actually present as a higher cutting angle) and softer species benefit from a hook turned at a higher angle (which would present to the timber as a lower cutting angle) - this makes sense intuitively, however I'm not sure if this is actually the case in practice - I'll need to play with it a lot more.

    20181229_095945R.jpg
    Tassie Oak Shavings

    20181228_132644R.jpg
    Walnut, Blackwood and Celery Shavings


    Cheers,

    Dom
    Attached Images Attached Images

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    937

    Default

    Interesting results - I had a similar experience with a HNT Gordon smoother last night. The HNTG's are all high angle bevel down, in this case it would plane hard spotted gum without issue but was leaving a rough surface on the much softer Surian cedar inlay (I think it's Surian). I would hazard a guess that it has something to do with the strength and elasticity of the wood fibres that determines what angle works best. But I could just be a newbie talking out my pooter

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Brisbane (western suburbs)
    Age
    77
    Posts
    12,124

    Default

    Some interesting & useful observations, Dom. I have LV's interpretation of the 112 which I bought about the time they started offering the thick blades, but decided to go with the 'thin' one. The Veritas has an extra bit that the original & the LN don't have, a 'bowing' screw to put a bow in the blade. There is one on the 80, so it puzzles me why they didn't bother on the 112. Anyway, the point to be made is that having a blade that can be bowed makes it quite a different animal to use, because it allows you to easily vary the depth of cut. I suspect any observations pertaining to my '112' wouldn't be all that relevant to your version, but for the record, I use about an 80 degree hook, probably a bit more forward lean than it looks like you're using, and more or less bow depending on how aggressively I want it to cut.

    I'm impressed by your shavings, they look to be at least a couple of thou. thick. I would struggle to get such thick shavings from the hard woods I usually use my scraper on, something less than a thou would be typical of what I'd get. I mostly use mine on really nasty, hard, no-two-fibres-going-in-the-same-direction woods that defeat my planes no matter how I set them up. I can usually persuade softer woods like Blackwood & Walnut to finish satisfactorily with either a standard angle, or one of my high-angle planes, but have had to resort to a scraper for a few softer woods like some very wild-grained N.G. Rosewood that tore out even with my very best smoother. I concur that you have to muck about a bit with different woods to find the sweet spots for amount of hook and attack angles. It's very satisfying when it all comes together and wide gossamer spew out, while the surface of the wood grows smoother & smoother.

    They sure save on sandpaper.......
    Cheers,
    IW

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    McBride BC Canada
    Posts
    3,543

    Default

    I make my own scrapers for what little that I need to do with carvings in hardwoods.
    Yours looks set to take an almighty bite, by the shavings. Just kiss off the top.

    Sandpapers always shred wood. They can do nothing else.
    Scrapers cut the surface. When you mess with them to cut thin with no tear-out,
    they sure do a fine finishing job.

    Thanks for all your process pictures. Much appreciated.

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Bundaberg
    Age
    54
    Posts
    3,427

    Default

    I picked up a Sweetheart era Stanley 112 a few years ago and I love it, I used it on my massive redgum kitchen benchtop after the initial flattening and smoothing with handplanes.

    I did a lot of research on the plane before touching the blade, and I also found it was the LN video on youtube on sharpening and setting up the LN112 that gave me the best advice for me.
    Nothing succeeds like a budgie without a beak.

Similar Threads

  1. VICTORIA Lie Nielsen planes. 62 1/2’ block, 162 low angle jack, 112 scraper.
    By Harmek in forum WOODWORK - Tools & Machinery
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 6th September 2018, 01:02 PM
  2. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 16th December 2016, 06:06 PM
  3. Lie Nielsen Cabinet Maker's Scraper
    By Eldanos of KDM in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWERED
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 22nd October 2009, 09:11 PM
  4. Cabinet scraper or scraper plane?
    By old_picker in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWERED
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 19th April 2006, 10:06 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •