Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Needs Pictures Needs Pictures:  0
Picture(s) thanks Picture(s) thanks:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 17
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    3,567

    Default The meaning and value Stanley Types 11, Sweetheart and other era's

    I have just come to understand that collectors and users of Stanley tools have a real thing for the types, each type referring to a period in the companies history.

    I am however interested as to why some types are more valued then others. Type 11 seems to be a very popular iteration, as well as the sweetheart era tools.

    My question is do types represent the apex of Stanley production, and are therefore the best user tool's and therefore are worth the extra dollars or is the interest in types more a thing that collector go mad for?

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #2
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Cowra - Central West NSW
    Posts
    813

    Default

    Our customers tend to only go for the older types, type 1-11 or so, I think that goes throught the the WW1 period?
    There are less tools in these periods that are still in good condition making them "rare" and therefore collectable, to some people.

    As there are many hundreds of planes most people will try at first to get a "set" from a particular time period, Like me, I'm shooting for a set (#1- #8c from 1910ish)

    Type 11 was a big boom period, lots of tools, and new designs, makes for easier collecting. sort of.... If you want to get your collection quick smart get on to ebay.com (USA) last night I think they had 1400 planes for auction, ebay.com.au had 140.

    Some types are also much better users, i'll let others comment on the use of different types.
    Steven Thomas


  4. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    686

    Default

    It's getting late here, Sucker.

    To find out what they mean, Google on Stanley Plane Dating Flowchart

    There's a lot of stuff out there. I think a guy called Bob Kaune has a page of Stanley trademarks vs the years they were used.


    The planes from around about 1910-1928 were some of the better ones (Sweetheart was in the 1920's)

    CHeers,

    eddie

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Kuranda
    Age
    66
    Posts
    202

    Default

    Another reason that types 9 to 14 are popular with users and collectors, is that they have patents cast onto the bed and this makes them easily identified on ebay. For example if a stanley plane is listed as having 2 patents you know it is either a type 9 or 10.
    If it goes against the grain, it's being rubbed the wrong way!

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Port Sorell, TAS
    Age
    59
    Posts
    1,633

    Default

    They're also great to use! The blade contacts the full face of the frog, and the castings were really well done - they used to toss out any imperfect castings in them days...
    The only way to get rid of a [Domino] temptation is to yield to it. Oscar Wilde

    .....so go4it people!

  7. #6
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Cowra - Central West NSW
    Posts
    813

    Default

    Steven Thomas


  8. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Japan。
    Age
    49
    Posts
    1,622

    Default

    I think the type 11 attraction can be described in the few short words.

    All of the fruit, no compromises.

    What that means is that all of the best ideas got put into one plane (with pat dates), and it has the low knob making it very, very easy to identify and as a plus, they are very, very good planes.

    Even more so when you end up with a type 5 Bedrock. All of the fruit, no compromises, and it's a Bedrock too.

    I think that maybe the Sweetheart (not really, Just Stanley Rule and Level and Stanley Works getting into bed together) was the very last of the no compromised planes. Don't forget, the depression hit around that time, and money was scarce, so everyone had to cut corners. Stanley must have, and as a result the quality naturally declined, and never fully recovered.

    That's my thinking now that I have actually thought about it. I'm probably way off the mark, but it makes sense to me.

  9. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    3,567

    Default

    Thank you for the clarification.

    I do like the look of the low knob and the more elaborate embossing on the early types.

    I am going to the HTPAA tool drool to have a look and maybe purchase. If I was collecting I would collect from the type 1-9 range since they are less common and more collectible, and I am patient. Never know where I may start.

    Does anyone have photos of their collection?

    As far as collecting goes I do like the Preston and Son's tools. Do people think that Preston has value. I saw a spokeshave go for $90 on ebay which was still cheaper then the same spokeshave by Stanley.

  10. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    N/A
    Posts
    50

  11. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    10,826

    Default

    As far as I am aware, the Type 11 was the first of the Stanleys to have a lateral adjuster. So, along with a full faced (flat) frog (which enabled better blade support), some of the best machining of the Stanley era, and the distinctive low knob, this is a users plane - earlier vintages are less user-friendly and, therefore, collector planes.

    The T11 is distinguished by having three dates behind the frog.

    As a point of interest for those wanting to buy this version of the Stanley bench plane, but not wanting to compete with the multitude vying for a "Type 11", then get the Type 12. It is absolutely identical save for the first high knob - which was, in fact, an upgrade on the low knob. The low knobs look a bit more sexy, but they provide less support. Look at the LN knobs - they chose high knobs when they could have chosen low.

    Regards from Perth

    Derek
    Visit www.inthewoodshop.com for tutorials on constructing handtools, handtool reviews, and my trials and tribulations with furniture builds.

  12. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    N/A
    Posts
    50

    Default

    Type 5 was the first lateral type actually.

  13. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    10,826

    Default

    Indeed they were, young Ryan. Absolutely correct.

    All I can think of then is that T11s are liked as they are the last of the low knobs (and among the best made).

    Regards from Perth

    Derek
    Visit www.inthewoodshop.com for tutorials on constructing handtools, handtool reviews, and my trials and tribulations with furniture builds.

  14. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    N/A
    Posts
    50

    Default

    I just have enough time on my hands to memorize this stuff lol. I prefer the 11s because of the low knob, patent dates, small adjustment wheel, and the over all fit and finish...but what do I know.

  15. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    2

    Default

    The bottom line is that they make good solid users and 11's and 12's in good nick are common. Most of my stuff is Type 11 or 12 as a result. The laminated blades do it for me. Shapes of totes vary somewhat over time eg teh forward swept early styles, and the types 11 and 12 fit me better than the earlier stuff.

    There seems to be a lot of stuff from these vintages floating about relative to other types...I see heaps of types 9-12, rarely anything younger, eg types 4 and 6.

  16. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Kuranda
    Age
    66
    Posts
    202

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thumbsucker View Post
    Does anyone have photos of their collection?

    There is a thread called "show off your Planes" in it you will find a photo of my planes and quite a few other collections as well.
    If it goes against the grain, it's being rubbed the wrong way!

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •