Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 44 of 44
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    5,773

    Default

    the platten on your belt sander will be a bit soft ...... even if it is flat( have you flattened it) ...... most sheppach gear is a bit light and flimsy in my experience.

    far more control on a straight strip of paper on a known flat cast iron table.

    cheers
    Any thing with sharp teeth eats meat.
    Most powertools have sharp teeth.
    People are made of meat.
    Abrasives can be just as dangerous as a blade.....and 10 times more painfull.

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #32
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Ballarat
    Posts
    104

    Default

    Do not fear guys, there's no way I'm putting a belt sander near it!

    I've checked it with a straight edge and it appears to be slightly convex in both directions. Having gone through a couple of irons in it's life without ever having been show any love, I expected the sole to be well worn.

    Quote Originally Posted by Vann View Post
    - if you haven't thrown out the USA plane body, you can look up to see how old the replacement parts are here RexMill.com Hand Planes 101 The Resource It looks to me to be a type 16 or newer (1933 >).
    The donor plane was a UK plane with a USA blade in it Here's a couple of images of it.

    $_57[1].JPG$_57[1].JPG

    The body and frog has near 100% japanning, but it had been broken and brazed so I got it cheap.

    It appears (as far as I can tell) to be made around the same era as my granddads (which is why I purchased it, I just looked for one with similar characteristics), the tote on it looked like it was cut from the same tree as the knob on mine, very happy with the match

  4. #33
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Canberra, ACT
    Posts
    51

    Default

    Nice work, the restoration is looking pretty sweet. Thanks for the post with the detail putting everything back together. I have a newer stanley #4 I've been cleaning to make it serviceable and it the tote (?) was also skewed quite badly, been having a hell of a time trying to get it aligned properly.

  5. #34
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Ballarat
    Posts
    104

    Default

    Ahh! That's better

    IMG_20160418_155326.jpg

  6. #35
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Bendigo
    Posts
    776

    Default

    Yes, it was a 'moment of madness' doing that. The Sheppach is fine for rough and fast aggressive sanding, nothing more than removing material fast

  7. #36
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Bendigo
    Posts
    776

    Default

    Looks great kenour. finally got my old one finished today. takes a mighty fine shaving, so good to work with and I think I'll now throw that modern Chinese Irwin 'Record' in the bin. How the heck did they appropriate that name and butcher it so much???? Time to work on the 5 1/2 friend just gave me too, he he happy camper now I am!

  8. #37
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    5,773

    Default

    don't throw the Record in the bin ..... with a bit of work, they can function quite well ..... bot as nice as a heritage plane, but passable.

    cheers
    Any thing with sharp teeth eats meat.
    Most powertools have sharp teeth.
    People are made of meat.
    Abrasives can be just as dangerous as a blade.....and 10 times more painfull.

  9. #38
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Seattle, Washington, USA
    Posts
    1,857

    Default

    Have you solved your "skipping" problem? I find that sometimes, when I have a plane that's not cutting, it can be because I have, over time, rounded the bevel. This is easily solved by hollow-grinding the bevel and sharpening.

    Just thought that might help.

    The plane looks great.

    Cheers,
    Luke

  10. #39
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Ballarat
    Posts
    104

    Default

    Finally got around to doing a bit more work on the sole. It's still slightly convex though!

    It's better than it was, I'm using emery paper on a flat surface (checked and double checked with a straight edge).

    The convex sole leaves the timber slightly concave (I suppose as expected).

    When offered up to a straight edge, there's still light coming though at the toe and heel. The flat section seems to be from just behind the mouth to about an inch away from the edge of the heel.

    I'm really starting to consider taking a scallop out from behind the mouth with my grinder!

    I'm applying lighter pressure because if suspect if I press down hard, it will flex the sole (which will remove more material from the toe and heel, which would leave it even more convex when I release the pressure).

    I'm not sure, don't want to take it past the point of no return. I'm just taking it one stroke at a time.

    Good bit of news, my replacement veritas blade arrived and has been installed. Very nice

  11. #40
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Ballarat
    Posts
    104

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Luke Maddux View Post
    Have you solved your "skipping" problem? I find that sometimes, when I have a plane that's not cutting, it can be because I have, over time, rounded the bevel. This is easily solved by hollow-grinding the bevel and sharpening.

    Just thought that might help.

    The plane looks great.

    Cheers,
    Luke
    Sorry I missed this post! Good to know. I'm not sure if it was flattening the soul, or sharpening the blade properly that seemed to have fixed the issue, but it's gone. It still tends to leave the work surface concave, not sure if it's because the sole still isn't perfectly flat, or technique.

  12. #41
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Lindfield N.S.W.
    Age
    62
    Posts
    5,643

    Default

    "surface concave"

    If by that you mean that you seem to have scooped out the middle a bit more than the ends of the cut (beginning and finish), I think that before you look at the plane, you should check your technique.

    It sounds to me that you have too much pressure on the front knob at the start of the cut and too much on the tote at the end of the cut. This is a good flaw as it is the opposite to the usual problem which leads to a convex surface. So before doing any more fiddling with the base, I would concentrate on being a bit more even in your pressure at the beginning and end of the cut and you will tend to get rid of the concave tendency. You may well find that this is more 'natural' and easier to keep up over time.
    Cheers

    Jeremy
    If it were done when 'tis done, then 'twere well it were done quickly

  13. #42
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Ballarat
    Posts
    104

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jmk89 View Post
    "surface concave"

    If by that you mean that you seem to have scooped out the middle a bit more than the ends of the cut (beginning and finish), I think that before you look at the plane, you should check your technique.

    It sounds to me that you have too much pressure on the front knob at the start of the cut and too much on the tote at the end of the cut. This is a good flaw as it is the opposite to the usual problem which leads to a convex surface. So before doing any more fiddling with the base, I would concentrate on being a bit more even in your pressure at the beginning and end of the cut and you will tend to get rid of the concave tendency. You may well find that this is more 'natural' and easier to keep up over time.
    Yeah that's right, the sole of the plane is slightly convex, so in my mind, it suggests that a concave surface would be the result (but my mind has tricked me before!).

    I will try altering my technique as you suggested Cheers.

  14. #43
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Mittagong, NSW
    Posts
    39

    Default

    Have you tried "citric acid"?
    Quote Originally Posted by ironik View Post
    What product are you using to remove the rust (and how well did it work with the overnight soak)? I picked up a few neglected planes at a garage sale and only semi-successful removing the rust from the working surfaces by hand.

  15. #44
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Bendigo
    Posts
    776

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael Hurley View Post
    Have you tried "citric acid"?
    I have used molasses with fantastic success quite a bit. One part molasses to four parts water mixed together. submerge the parts for two weeks, then brush off the rust to dead clean metal guys. Was suss about it when i first heard the technique, but wouldn't bother with anything else any more.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Similar Threads

  1. Stanley/Bailey No4 & 7 restoration
    By springwater in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWERED
    Replies: 76
    Last Post: 7th January 2016, 07:10 PM
  2. Stanley 246 (cordless) miter saw- Restoration
    By fineboxes in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWERED
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 21st July 2013, 09:51 PM
  3. Stanley Plane restoration (thanks Major Panic)
    By BrettC in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWERED
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 24th February 2013, 06:21 PM
  4. Stanley 60 Block Plane Restoration
    By Burnsy in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWERED
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 6th May 2008, 03:29 PM
  5. Stanley handyman restoration
    By kiwioutdoors in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWERED
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 29th September 2005, 02:00 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •