Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Needs Pictures: 0
Picture(s) thanks: 0
Results 1 to 15 of 28
Thread: Squares - I wish
-
16th May 2009, 01:43 AM #1SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- Perth
- Posts
- 966
Squares - I wish
Is it me, or is it really hard to get good accurate squares?
The story: I test my squares are square by placing one edge against a straight edge and drawing a line, then flipping it over and drawing another line. If the lines are not parralel the square is not square.
So, pretty much ALL my squares are not square, either on the inside, outside or sometimes both.
So being my birthday today, I went to Carbatec and bought one of their squares that is "guaranteed square to 0.5 of a degree". I asked the fellows in the shop if this was their most accurate square, and he said "Yes. In fact, we use this as our reference square.".
(I bet you can see where this is going...)
Took it home and guess what? Not square. The lines diverge by about a millimetre over 400mm.
Now to be fair, this MAY be accurate to 0.5 of a degree - I can't be arsed working it out. But still, sure there is a square out there that is actually square?
Any sugestions?
-
16th May 2009 01:43 AM # ADSGoogle Adsense Advertisement
- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Posts
- Many
-
16th May 2009, 06:33 AM #2Senior Member
- Join Date
- May 2008
- Location
- Vermont, VIC
- Posts
- 238
G'day Wongdai,
Maybe a recalibratable square from Colen Clenton (http://www.hntgordon.com.au/colenclentonsquares.htm) will meet your requirement. Of course, budget permitting.
I used a 3 inch engineering square to check sawing and planing edges, and the Empire True Blue (http://www.empirelevel.com/squares/combination_squares/) 6 inch and 12 inch combi squares. But nothing over 400mm.
I do know that Empire makes a combi square at 400mm, but as you've mentioned, is it "truly" square.
GUNN
-
16th May 2009, 06:51 AM #3
Clark, also the incra squares are good . . . but them Col Clenton's are smooth and Aussie made.
Pat
Work is a necessary evil to be avoided. Mark Twain
-
16th May 2009, 08:19 AM #4SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- Gold Coast
- Age
- 49
- Posts
- 591
hi wongdai, i recently had the same trouble, so i went to carbatec brisbane and drooled over the colen clenton squares, you will have to re-mortgage your house to buy one of those puppies!
i ended up buying a boxed set of 3 engineering squares, the longest being 200mm long, i use a stanley knife to check for square rather than a pencil.
the box set was about $80, and perfectly square.
regards, justin.
-
16th May 2009, 08:31 AM #5
Yep, engineering squares are the go. Got a 4" and an 8", and as long as you don't drop them they are square...
Bob C.
Never give up.
-
16th May 2009, 08:55 AM #6
I have several rosewood/brass/steel squares (I think they may be old Marples squares) and none of them were square when new. I regularly check my squares against a known straight edge as Wongdai described above, but then I tap the end of the blade on a block of wood, re-check them and repeat until they are square.
Squares don't need to be dropped to go out of true - it seems they can do it all by themselves just laying around on the bench or hanging on the wall..
I know you believe you understand what you think I wrote, but I'm not sure you realize that what you just read is not what I meant.
Regards, Woodwould.
-
16th May 2009, 09:05 AM #7.... some old things are lovely
Warm still with the life of forgotten men who made them ........................D.H. Lawrence
https://thevillagewoodworker.blogspot.com/
-
16th May 2009, 09:09 AM #8
I bought 1 of carba-tec's engineers squares,
http://www.carbatec.com.au/measureme...rsquos-squares
I've found it to be pretty good & use it to check any other squares i buy.
-
16th May 2009, 09:12 AM #9
Hi Wongdai,
as others have said before. The engineering squares are very good value for money. You can pay a lot or a little and the accuracy will vary even in some of the more expensive brands.
Colen Clenton's and Chris Vesper's squares are fantastic if you have the spare readys.
You will never regret the purchase.
http://catalog.starrett.com/catalog/catalog/PLH2.asp?NodeNum=21489&Mode=PLIST
http://www.totaltools.com.au/icat/pdf.php?id=265
https://www.vespertools.com.au/index.php?option=com_virtuemart&Itemid=34
and you have the link to the Clenton tools in another post.
Total tools even have their OEM eng squares that are pretty good too.
Good luck
Kevin
-
16th May 2009, 09:36 AM #10
I like Colen Clenton's square because it is easily recalibrated. I am also very impressed with his service and advice, just what a woodworker needs, a guy who makes tools, knows them backwards and stands by them completely.
Chris Vesper's square is a real beauty for the small stuff and dovetails especially. 'Tis a thing of beauty (but not cheap). Buy one and have the family bury it with you.
EDIT: I should add that I used a Marples for a long time too (until I trod on it )
-
16th May 2009, 10:01 AM #11
Using Sketchup and the protractor function my calculations say that 0.5* over 400mm is 3.5mm! I've checked and rechecked this and it appears to be correct.
0.1* is 0.7mm and 0.05* is 0.3mm over 400mm.
I've also just realized that the way you've checked your square will double any results. Meaning that if your square has a tolerance of 0.5* over 400mm your checking lines could be up to 7mm apart and be on the limit of tolerance!
Ben
-
16th May 2009, 10:27 AM #12Senior Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Location
- Oxenford
- Age
- 31
- Posts
- 202
But wood moves a little bit anyway so something that is only a tiny bit out shouldnt matter too much...
Michael
If you cant fix it with a hammer, you have an electrical problem...
-
16th May 2009, 10:49 AM #13
Your square is accurate to 0.14 of a degree ( or to put it another way 3.5 times more accurate than what Carbatec claims!)
There is no such thing as a perfect square, and even if there was, there is still no marking tool available that has a zero width . The level of accuracy you need really depends on what sort of work you are doing. In any case, wood expands and contracts significantly and can't be finished as precisely as metal."If something is really worth doing, it is worth doing badly." - GK Chesterton
-
16th May 2009, 11:25 AM #14
I use an Incra 186mm Before that I used my Dad's little old 4" Henry Disston & Sons, but with the Incra I found it was out about .5mm. So that's my excuse for any booboos.
If I could afford it a Chris Vesper or Colen Clenton's square.
-
16th May 2009, 02:09 PM #15
Yes, along with other similar comments. On top of which, are there many of us that don't double check their square regularly, I know that I certainly flip my square or mark from both edges of a piece every single time; then again that may help compensate for my other lazy habits.
Denn
Similar Threads
-
Combination squares
By Ivor in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWEREDReplies: 25Last Post: 28th July 2020, 03:04 PM -
Jevons 3D clamping squares
By jmk89 in forum WOODWORK - GENERALReplies: 4Last Post: 22nd December 2008, 08:02 AM -
Anybody got any big old wooden squares you want to sell ?
By JDarvall in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWEREDReplies: 24Last Post: 27th September 2007, 12:33 PM -
Cutting out squares in MDF
By reltn in forum WOODWORK - GENERALReplies: 3Last Post: 9th July 2005, 06:50 PM -
Squares over Curves
By jacko in forum WOODWORK PICSReplies: 8Last Post: 6th November 2003, 11:13 PM