Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Needs Pictures: 0
Picture(s) thanks: 0
Results 16 to 30 of 68
Thread: new stanley #5 - help to tune
-
9th July 2005, 02:40 PM #16
My Plane is a Bailey which I reckon isn't as good as a Stanley although it did have a stanley clamp on it. Didn't work at all when I got it. So I began going through the list here to find out what to do about it.
Scarey Sharp was a help. Putting the sole on a diamond stone made it flatter than it was, then over to the glass plate to get the high points properly lined up with each other. Was better but still nothing special. Then I took the frog out and OH MY GOD looks like they did the surfaces in there with an angle grinder. So I did much the same thing again to clean up the surfaces inside. The surfaces on the sole had to be done very carefully with a file as nothing else would fit in there. Had to do this bit a few times as it was all out of whack so to get the frog into square I had to go bit by bit.
Anyhow it works better now. I have a Veritas blade on order and that I hope will make it better again. It works after a fashion and I don't know how much better the high end planes are but it is a definite improvement over what it was.
This is all while I save my money for a Veritas. Got a TS10HB and DC this week so better pull my horns in for a bit.
About Veritas does anyone know the no6 low angle that they do. It looks really good for planing and smoothing hardwoods such as the Tallow Wood and Yellow Stringybark that came from E.Maculata.
StevoAussie Hardwood Number One
-
9th July 2005 02:40 PM # ADSGoogle Adsense Advertisement
- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Age
- 2010
- Posts
- Many
-
9th July 2005, 02:58 PM #17Originally Posted by scooter
Squizz the sarcastic cynic
CheersSquizzy
"It is better to be ignorant and ask a stupid question than to be plain Stupid and not ask at all" {screamed by maths teacher in Year 8}
-
9th July 2005, 03:00 PM #18
A very timely post....am about to tune a new Stanley #4 in a few minutes. Wish me luck.
Whatever note you blow youre never more than a semitone away from the correct one....(Miles Davis)
-
9th July 2005, 03:05 PM #19Originally Posted by Studley 2436
Please explain (with Pauiline Hansen voiceover)You can never have enough planes, that is why Mr Stanley invented the 1/2s
-
9th July 2005, 03:09 PM #20
oh yeah and Clinton, ditch the new one and as Derek said get a nice old one, then after you have spent a day redoing it it will be much better than the old one.
Having said that, if you have the money get a Veritas plane, I have used one for the first time last week (I dont own one yet) and they are much better than even stanley old ones... and I should know... my old ones have multiplied in the shed to 8 now!You can never have enough planes, that is why Mr Stanley invented the 1/2s
-
9th July 2005, 03:14 PM #21Originally Posted by Studley 2436
Cheers
MartinWhatever note you blow youre never more than a semitone away from the correct one....(Miles Davis)
-
9th July 2005, 03:20 PM #22
-
9th July 2005, 03:22 PM #23Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Location
- Australian (in exile) - UK
- Posts
- 468
It's sad that Stanley feel able to sell such an inferior quality product but nearly all their planes can be resurrected.
If it's too far out then the best thing to do is take it to your local engineering firm and have them surface grind the sole and sides. I've done it and it sure beats sitting there for hours with wet and dry paper.
Cheers
Dave
-
9th July 2005, 03:50 PM #24Originally Posted by routermaniac
The sole says Bailey and has a made in england on it too. There is only one screw to adjust the frog back and forth to vary the mouth opening. This is different to others I have seen which have two screws for this adjustment.
StudleyAussie Hardwood Number One
-
9th July 2005, 04:19 PM #25
The Stanley Rule and Level Co. of New Britain, Connecticut, was something like the Microsoft of their day. Any competitor with a good idea, they took over. This included Leonard Bailey & Co. in 1878, when they came up with a neat way of holding a blade at a fixed angle relative to the sole. Hence the Stanley "Bailey" line of planes. See http://www.davistownmuseum.org/bioStanley.htm and http://www.antiquetools.co.uk/stanley.html which states:
in 1906 after Bailey's death, [the Stanley Company] commemorates Bailey by casting his name in their standard line of bench planes
"Bedrock" is a later designation of Stanley planes, referring to another, purportedly superior, design of plane, having a frog that was adjustable without removing the blade.Those are my principles, and if you don't like them . . . well, I have others.
-
9th July 2005, 04:21 PM #26Originally Posted by davo453You can never have enough planes, that is why Mr Stanley invented the 1/2s
-
9th July 2005, 06:40 PM #27
Thanks all for your replies.
I think that I am cool with flattening the sole - but Studley 2436 is spot on about the frog and the way it is 'mated' to the plane body, and what about the way the mouth is ground. This is just rubbish.
I'll have a go with returning it to Blackwoods - the retailer, and I sent a nasty-gram to Stanley outlining my dissatsifaction.
I got a Mujiingfang No 4 and an antique Trying plane off Ebay, and I have a very old "Falcon No4" that is collecting rust. I cannot afford a LA plane, although I will probably have to go for a HNT Gordon, which fits my buy Australian policy. I am having a think about a retro-engineer "kit" for the Stanley - but I do not have a metal mill to do this - I'll post my results (even if its just a plan and cost) when I finish.
Thanks again - It is just dissapointing to spend $120 (thats a lot of pocket money for me) on something that is so poorly designed/made. DO I now add English made to the same category as Chinese made???
Again, thanks for the input, you guys are a wealth of knowledge, hope I am able to add something one day rather than just post questions.
Cheers
-
9th July 2005, 06:45 PM #28
I'll get some pics together of my plane so you can see the work I have done.
I don't have a camera with me today but perhaps monday or tuesday I can get something up for you all to see.
StudleyAussie Hardwood Number One
-
9th July 2005, 06:52 PM #29Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2003
- Location
- Western Sydney
- Posts
- 245
Clinton,
As per previous posts, what you got is a typical new Stanley handplane - made in UK but the quality of manufacture is :mad: .
You can tune it properly - within reason. This exercise will also help you to understand the working of these planes bit better so it will be handy in the future.
First remove all the bits except the knob & handle and start flattening with P80 wet & dry. You can see the high spots after a few laps, use belt sander with P120 grit to remove the high spots & back to lapping.
Work through the grits 120, 180 & 240; that is enough for a No5: IMHO but you may go as high as you want to. It is a jack plane, so not meant for fine work.
The whole flattening exercise may take a few hours.
Now, check the frog & its seating area. Level them the best you can, including the blade seating area of the frog. The reported symptoms indicate problems associated with this area.
Derek posted his method of fixing these problems a while ago. You may want to look it up.
Older Stanly planes are as expensive as LN & LV .
One day we all will by LN & LV planes only, till then it is a good idea to learn to tune a Stanley .
Good luck.
Regards,
Theva
-
9th July 2005, 08:22 PM #30Originally Posted by bitingmidge
But even when your off the kernals it strangely still seems possible ......or hang on .... maybe thats just the magic mushrooms talking.... ? :confused:
Anyway what are you talking about......I never said just a 'few minutes',,,that implys like.... say.... '10 minutes'........it more like takes anywhere between 1 to 2 hours....... even faster when I'm sniffing turps......Last edited by JDarvall; 9th July 2005 at 08:23 PM. Reason: forgot to cross my 'i''s and dot my 't' 's.
Similar Threads
-
History of Stanley/Bailey Bench Planes
By silentC in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWEREDReplies: 29Last Post: 1st December 2010, 08:27 PM -
Tuning a Stanley #140 Skew Block Plane
By derekcohen in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWEREDReplies: 28Last Post: 5th September 2006, 04:23 PM -
New Stanley Bedrock Planes
By matt1245 in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWEREDReplies: 46Last Post: 30th June 2005, 08:06 AM -
Stanley 5
By routermaniac in forum HOMEMADE TOOLS AND JIGS ETC.Replies: 1Last Post: 24th June 2005, 06:23 PM -
Stanley #62 (low angle jack) renovation (long)
By derekcohen in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWEREDReplies: 27Last Post: 3rd March 2005, 04:42 PM