Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Needs Pictures: 0
Picture(s) thanks: 0
Results 46 to 60 of 68
Thread: new stanley #5 - help to tune
-
16th July 2005, 10:47 AM #46
Stanley #340
If I may dare to challenge Patrick Leach by quoting Garrett Hack:
Originally Posted by The Handplane Book - Garrett Hack
I'm betting Hack is perfectly correct.
Isn't the internet a wonderful place for information?
P
-
16th July 2005 10:47 AM # ADSGoogle Adsense Advertisement
- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Posts
- Many
-
16th July 2005, 03:35 PM #47Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Location
- Australian (in exile) - UK
- Posts
- 468
Originally Posted by routermaniac
The #5 I had done only cost me $15 in the first place so I reckoned it was worth it
Cheers
Dave
-
16th July 2005, 06:16 PM #48
Thats not the dark side
Originally Posted by apricotripper
-
16th July 2005, 07:52 PM #49Originally Posted by davo453You can never have enough planes, that is why Mr Stanley invented the 1/2s
-
17th July 2005, 01:23 AM #50
Zenwood came around here today and brought his box of planes with him. He has a set anyone would be proud of. We made some shavings on some of the hardwood I got from E.Maculata. This was timber that was tearing out like mad with my stanley. So Zen pulled out his American Stanley I think a number 7 and that ran along it and just cleaned it off so easily. Likewise the Lie Nielsens too. He had a big jointer that was great for the big boards we were working. Later we put a little wax on the no 62 (I told you he had a set) and that really lifted it all up a level again.
Even with these great tools I did notice that the hardwood wore the edges down and so resharpening was something you have to keep up on. All in all a great day. A couple of these higher grade planes are on my wish list now.
StudleyAussie Hardwood Number One
-
17th July 2005, 02:07 AM #51
Zenwood wrote:
Guru Patrick Leach of Stanley Blood and Gore, does not subscribe to the view that plane soles must be absolutely flat.
The point is, there are just three critical areas on the plane sole - the toe, the area in front of the mouth, and the heel. These areas must be coplanar. The areas inbetween are of lesser importance. Indeed, Japanese planes are relieved in these areas.
Does a jointer need to be as flat/coplanar as a smoother? Absolutely! While the jointer is not expected to produce the fine shavings of a smoother, it is still expected to support the plane at the mouth to reduce tearout. It is also expected to plane flat - that is, not act like a banana - because its job is to plane flat. Even a jack plane should be coplanar. All planes should be coplanar. It is only in the setting for the size of the mouth that separate their purposes.
Regards from Perth
Derek
-
17th July 2005, 08:35 AM #52Originally Posted by boban
So, if Luke luggs around an 8" jointer,,and,,,Darth holds a #340....what does Jabba the hut hold ???
-
17th July 2005, 11:00 AM #53Originally Posted by apricotripperDriver of the Forums
Lord of the Manor of Upper Legover
-
17th July 2005, 05:45 PM #54
I believe that Jabba the hut would hold a fatty hamburger and fries ??
-
17th July 2005, 09:53 PM #55Originally Posted by bitingmidge
I'm betting Hack is perfectly correct.
Isn't the internet a wonderful place for information?Those are my principles, and if you don't like them . . . well, I have others.
-
17th July 2005, 10:12 PM #56Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2003
- Location
- Western Sydney
- Posts
- 245
"Wise men pick their battles"
Sure, I am quoting somebody; can't remember...
Cheers,
Theva
-
17th July 2005, 11:01 PM #57
Pictures of the beast
In light of the fantastic amount of replies and quality information I have received on this thread, I will post some pics of the beast. Please bear with me, the photos are from the digi camera in my phone, and I have not posted pics before. I went next door and we used bearing blue on a true surface.
The sole has high spots down one side and behind the mouth; the rest (hopefully) you can see for yourself. I have not included the "lands" that the frog contacts to as it mounts to the body of the plane... thats really scary.
After 30 minutes I am ready to post this reply.... I just learnt to use a few programs and the manage attachment button.... claps please
To those that have replied so far, thanks and if the greenies have not arrived, they are in the post.
-
17th July 2005, 11:06 PM #58
whoops - forgot this one
-
17th July 2005, 11:11 PM #59Originally Posted by zenwood
Here's a quote from the movie Spaceballs:
Mel Brooks (as the Death Star Commander): Comb the desert!
Starship Troopers (dragging huge comb through the sand): We combed it already and we didn't find sheee-it!
So what if it's got nothing to do with this thread. It's called a hi-jack, man!Driver of the Forums
Lord of the Manor of Upper Legover
-
17th July 2005, 11:19 PM #60
Similar Threads
-
History of Stanley/Bailey Bench Planes
By silentC in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWEREDReplies: 29Last Post: 1st December 2010, 08:27 PM -
Tuning a Stanley #140 Skew Block Plane
By derekcohen in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWEREDReplies: 28Last Post: 5th September 2006, 04:23 PM -
New Stanley Bedrock Planes
By matt1245 in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWEREDReplies: 46Last Post: 30th June 2005, 08:06 AM -
Stanley 5
By routermaniac in forum HOMEMADE TOOLS AND JIGS ETC.Replies: 1Last Post: 24th June 2005, 06:23 PM -
Stanley #62 (low angle jack) renovation (long)
By derekcohen in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWEREDReplies: 27Last Post: 3rd March 2005, 04:42 PM