Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Needs Pictures: 0
Picture(s) thanks: 0
Results 1 to 15 of 68
Thread: new stanley #5 - help to tune
-
8th July 2005, 11:04 PM #1
new stanley #5 - help to tune
Hey - I recently bought a Stanley Bailey No. 5 Jack plane. Unfortunately I bought it with a mistaken understnding of the quality of the tool.
I've followed the Scarey Sharp (very cool, am doing all my chisels and have nearly completely hairless arms.... ) for the blade, and the tuning system that is described or linked on various threads on this forum.
My problem is that the plane seems really poorly engineered. The frog is nearly impossible to set square to the mouth. The cap iron is almost impossible to set square to the iron edge. The actual design or engineering of the plane seems to be setting it up for a very poor end result. Add to this the general shoddy standard of production ... and I am in a world of hurt with this tool. The end result is that after about 15 - 20 strokes along a 1200mm 100x100mm cypress post - the plane blade is skewed in the mouth and I need to reset it with the Lateral Adjusting Lever.
Anyone experienced the skewing of the blade and is able to give me some pointers???
Apologies to Stanley - if I have got one that slipped through quality control... if not, and my plane is 'up to spec' then the apology is withdrawn.
-
8th July 2005 11:04 PM # ADSGoogle Adsense Advertisement
- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Posts
- Many
-
9th July 2005, 12:03 AM #2
Clinton, I assume the plane was bought new or it is a modern plane in which case it is "up to spec" or more correctly "up to S**t". The quality varies somewhat in the modern ones. There is a lot of hints and tips on the BB and on the web but what you need to do first is check the sole for flatness.
Since you are into SS you will likely have a piece of glass or something equally as flat. Apply some prussian blue (available from machining and hardware supplys) to the sole and give it a rub on some 1200 grit or higher. Then have a look at the sole and see how flat it is. If the thing is miles out ditch it. If the sole is flat and the sides are reasonable square to the sole then its probably worth fettling.
After that its anybody's guess at what might have to be done. Heaps of info available here. A number of posts by Derek Cohen show his method of squaring up his plane on the table saw.
Good luck
CheersSquizzy
"It is better to be ignorant and ask a stupid question than to be plain Stupid and not ask at all" {screamed by maths teacher in Year 8}
-
9th July 2005, 12:08 AM #3
Sell it on eBay.
Put the proceeds toward the cost of a good new plane.
IE. Lie-Nielsen, Veritas, HNT Gordon or Clifton.
If that's beyond the budget, then buy an old (before 1960 if possible) Stanley.
Or get yourself a MujingFang for around $20. They are much better tools than modern Stanleys.
-
9th July 2005, 12:12 AM #4Originally Posted by vsquizz
No offense vsquizz, very few plane soles, in my opinion, are that far gone that they can't be flatterned.......even the very bad ones are easily flatterned on coarse grit.....(don't get hot under collar now )
-
9th July 2005, 12:30 AM #5
Clinton
It is best to break it to you straight. New Stanley planes suck! You probably have a representative example. :eek:
So you have three choices:
1. Take it back. Tell the truth. The plane is badly made and sucks. Give me my money back, now!
2. Send the plane to Apricotripper. He is crazy enough ( ) to want to renovate it (renovate a new plane!? Tuning a new plane I understand, but have to renovate it!!)
OK, it can be done, but it is not cost-effective. This is why one pays the extra for a good plane, like a LN or LV or Clifton.
3. It will make a good doorstop or boat anchor. That is about all it is good for. Sorry.
Once you have made one of these decisions (which, I might add, is more sensible than buying a new Stanley plane), go and buy a second-hand Stanley plane, preferably one that is pre-WW II, preferably USA-made. A #5 is a good all-round size. Try eBay.
Do a search here for tuning tips, or go to http://www.woodcentral.com/bparticles/plane_tune.shtml
Regards from Perth
Derek
-
9th July 2005, 12:41 AM #6Originally Posted by derekcohen
.....good stuff....
But I am a little cross at ya :mad: :mad: .......why the hell did you give away my secret identity...... I'm no longer anonamos(spelling?).....I mean, I live in a small country town you know.........I'll be walking down town tomorrow to pick up some ....I don't know.....vanilla essense ?........and people will say.......Jake !!!! so, youRRRRR 'Apricotripper' !!!! I mean, thats just nasty Derek.......Every superhero has to have a secret identity.....
-
9th July 2005, 12:49 AM #7my secret identity......
Everyone close your eyes while I remove the evidence ...
Kind regards from Perth
Derek
-
9th July 2005, 12:58 AM #8Originally Posted by derekcohen
But you've got a soft hart haven't ya.......
(its not 'ya' Jake!!!!....its 'YOU' !!!!!.....'HOW MANY TIMES DO I HAVE TO TELL YOU, FOR HEAVONS SAKE!!!!!!....... ..sorry muuum .)
-
9th July 2005, 01:00 AM #9Originally Posted by apricotripper
You obviously haven't ever seen me at Bunnings with my straight edge, sitting on the floor with 35 new stanley's out of their boxes trying to find a flat one! (Another waste of my limited time on this planet)
I think its CraigB who will attest to the virtues of honing down the soles of modern Stanleys. Like watching paint dry and working on the helicopter ejection seat . Hows about posting your mailing address here so we can all send you the scrap iron. At least Mr Sims might give you 45 cents for them
I always try not to take off with fences but Derek's subtle approach to the topic pretty much nails it for me Q. What do you call four modern Stanley planes hanging on a chain... A. A good reason to go fishing.
CheersSquizzy
"It is better to be ignorant and ask a stupid question than to be plain Stupid and not ask at all" {screamed by maths teacher in Year 8}
-
9th July 2005, 01:19 AM #10Originally Posted by vsquizz
Originally Posted by vsquizz
Good night fella's .....I'm buggered......off to bed
seeya
-
9th July 2005, 01:24 AM #11Originally Posted by apricotripper
new stanley #5 - help to tune
Jack."There is no dark side of the moon really. Matter of fact it's all dark."
-
9th July 2005, 01:25 AM #12Originally Posted by apricotripper
Goodnight
CheersSquizzy
"It is better to be ignorant and ask a stupid question than to be plain Stupid and not ask at all" {screamed by maths teacher in Year 8}
-
9th July 2005, 10:12 AM #13Originally Posted by Jack E
I have never been sure what key to tune the number five in, mine is about 3 notes higher than the #4, but I suspect it really should be an octave above the #3.
The best technique for me is to tighten the frog to concert pitch and gently tap the sides while taking minute passes with 2000 wet and dry. Unfortunately I haven't yet found a way of increasing he pitch if too much metal is taken off.
I presently am waiting on a decent #6, the only gap in the scale on my Stanley Marimba.
Cheers,
P (Tripping on organic dates.)
-
9th July 2005, 11:01 AM #14
Fret not, grasshopper.
A few years ago, like you, I bought a new stanley (#4). Man, was that thing a bugger. Since then I have bought a few Lie Nielsens, Veritas, even a reproduction compass plane and an ECE wooden dovetail plane. These tools are all vastly superior to the modern stanleys, and a pleasure to use.
I'll side with the recommendation to ditch it. My original #4 sits gathering dust on the bottom shelf, waiting for just such a fate (all yours apricot, if you want it).
If you're getting into the world of handplanes I recommend the following sources. Garrett Hack's The Handplane Book
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg...glance&s=books
is a great book, and includes Chapter 4 "Tuning a Plane", which begins with this quotation:But before you come to use your planes, you must know how to grind, and whet them, for they are not fitted when they are bought, but every Workman accomodates them to this purpose, as if it be an hard wood he is to work on, he grinds his basil to a more obtuse angle, than he would do for soft wood. --Joseph Moxon, Mechanick Exercises, 3rd Ed., 1703Had Joseph Moxon lived today, he would have discovered that the good modern planes (LN, LV, HNTG etc) are indeed 'fitted when they are bought'.
The other source is Patrick Leach's "Stanley Blood and Gore"
http://www.supertool.com/StanleyBG/stan0a.html
which describes every Stanley plane ever made, their pros and cons, how to get them working, what to look for etc. Patrick is not a member of the 'flat sole society'.
So, grasshopper, go forth and plane.Those are my principles, and if you don't like them . . . well, I have others.
-
9th July 2005, 12:22 PM #15Originally Posted by vsquizz
Probably best to use a Grrripper (sp?) also, to be safe.
Cheers.............Sean, drawn and quartered
The beatings will continue until morale improves.
Similar Threads
-
History of Stanley/Bailey Bench Planes
By silentC in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWEREDReplies: 29Last Post: 1st December 2010, 08:27 PM -
Tuning a Stanley #140 Skew Block Plane
By derekcohen in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWEREDReplies: 28Last Post: 5th September 2006, 04:23 PM -
New Stanley Bedrock Planes
By matt1245 in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWEREDReplies: 46Last Post: 30th June 2005, 08:06 AM -
Stanley 5
By routermaniac in forum HOMEMADE TOOLS AND JIGS ETC.Replies: 1Last Post: 24th June 2005, 06:23 PM -
Stanley #62 (low angle jack) renovation (long)
By derekcohen in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWEREDReplies: 27Last Post: 3rd March 2005, 04:42 PM