Page 5 of 44 FirstFirst 1234567891015 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 655
  1. #61
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    'Delaide, Australia
    Age
    65
    Posts
    8,138

    Default

    It also means that a unnoticed defect in the grain is unlikely to be highly important.

    MIK

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Age
    2010
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #62
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Savannah GA USA
    Posts
    583

    Default

    You will spend a fortune buying 3 or 4 sanding sheets/discs in a pack. Go to your marine supply house (or auto paint suppy) and buy your sandpaper in quantity. A roll of sandpaper will be 30-50 dollars but will have 100 or more discs/sheets instead of 3-4.

    Back when I was in the cabinet business I ran some tests on sandpaper brands. Mirka had just started being sold in the US and their prices undercut the usual suspects--3M and Norton. The Mirka Gold paper outlasted both of the favored brands by a noticeable amount so I've been a fan ever since.

    One more tip for anyone who uses a sander with clamps instead of self-adhesive or hook-loop attachments. The old-timers who worked for me would put a half-dozen sheets on the sander and then rip off the outer one when it was worn out. My tests proved that doing this actually accelerates the wear on the layers. It might save a little time but your second, third, fourth, etc. sheets are already worn when you get around to using them.
    The "Cosmos Mariner,"My Goat Island Skiff
    http://s176.photobucket.com/albums/w168/MiddleAgesMan/

    Starting the Simmons Sea Skiff 18
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/37973275@N03/

  4. #63
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Hunter Valley NSW
    Age
    69
    Posts
    1,759

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MiddleAgesMan View Post
    The old-timers who worked for me would put a half-dozen sheets on the sander and then rip off the outer one when it was worn out. My tests proved that doing this actually accelerates the wear on the layers. It might save a little time but your second, third, fourth, etc. sheets are already worn when you get around to using them.
    Your tests proved that this practice was about the silliest thing I've ever heard of!

  5. #64
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Fenwick, Michigan
    Age
    75
    Posts
    908

    Default

    A roll of sandpaper will be 30-50 dollars but will have 100 or more discs/sheets instead of 3-4.
    I'm all for saving money. But speaking without the benefit of experience to back this question, just how long would that $90-$150 (a roll of each: 80, 150 and 220 grit) worth of sandpaper last me? Sound like a lifetime supply.
    Building Gardens of Fenwick, a Welsford Parthfinder
    Gardens of Fenwick
    Karen Ann, a Storer GIS
    Goat Island Skiff - Sacramento

  6. #65
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Netherlands
    Age
    67
    Posts
    248

    Default

    A bit of my experience sanding;

    Indeed good quality sandpaper saves money, I use 3M because that's widely available here. Disc's are far more expensive than sheets or rolls. In professional use they are worth the costs, because labour is so much more expensive than the paper. In that perspective you need to see those professionals ripping off dozens of discs, to be able to speed up a sanding job.
    I use square standard sheets of 3M paper, and bought a professional mini-square sander that uses exactly 1/4 sheet.

    For hand-jobs ( rounding, round surfaces and corners.....there is a lot you can not do with an electric sander ) I start to use parts of sanding belts ( It started since I bought a bunch of wrong sized belts for my sander ) . Even the cheapest sanding-belts are very good quality sanding "paper", they have a woven backing that lasts very long. You can cut ( actually tear) them into smaller pieces, but you can also use long pieces for a fast rounding job ( f.e. spars ) . It's amazing how long they last,comparing with ordinairy sanding paper.

    Ofcourse most things are very depending on availabilty and pricing in your local market.
    But do NOT underestimate these costs building a boat, there is much sanding to do

  7. #66
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    'Delaide, Australia
    Age
    65
    Posts
    8,138

    Default

    Even if you buy sheets the quality stuff is so much better - at least with the brands that are available here.

    MIK

  8. #67
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Hunter Valley NSW
    Age
    69
    Posts
    1,759

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Boatmik View Post
    Howdy,

    I can't give a standard stiffness, I am afraid. I promise you that what you have built will work though and work better than most spar designs for dinghies.

    I think that the Dutch group of GIS sailors will be most likely to work out an optimum stiffness by sailing the boats together and making changes like this in a systematic way.

    Best wishes
    Michael
    Hi Mick
    I'm still toying with my flexi spars, and may glass them to stiffen them. Your plans mention to allow 50mm (2") deflection in the spars. How much weight would you say is needed to achieve this?

  9. #68
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Tilburg, the Netherlands
    Age
    51
    Posts
    519

    Default

    Hello Bruce,

    I will try to make measurements soon of both my GIS yard and boom to see what the deflections are. My spars are exactly according to MIK's specs and made of fine grained oregon pine, coated with 3 coats of epoxy and varnished with 7 coats of Epifanes.

    I was also amazed by the amount of flex in the spars when I had just made them. In use however, they seem to work fine (mine have held up fine in winds up to 25 knots). The sail will become very flat though when applying proper tension on the downhaul as both the yard and the boom will deflect a lot, thus flattening the sail (mine is a standard Duckworks sail with standard reef points).

    As stated before, I am planning on making a second set of spars of larger diameter (50 mm rather than 40 mm). Time and testing will tell what works and what not. As it is becoming winter here in the Netherlands, we will have to wait until end of March 2010 for test results.

    Best regards,

    Joost
    Last edited by Joost; 5th December 2009 at 01:06 AM. Reason: Spelling errors

  10. #69
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    'Delaide, Australia
    Age
    65
    Posts
    8,138

    Default

    Howdy Joost,

    Going up to 50mm will be about 2.5 times stiffer.

    I am wondering if only part shaping the spars makes some sense. ie only radiusing the front face. This would mean that the back face could be planed down or have some extra material laminated on later to get the bend you wanted.

    ?

    MIK

  11. #70
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Portland, ME USA
    Posts
    837

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Boatmik View Post
    Howdy Joost,

    Going up to 50mm will be about 2.5 times stiffer.

    I am wondering if only part shaping the spars makes some sense. ie only radiusing the front face. This would mean that the back face could be planed down or have some extra material laminated on later to get the bend you wanted.

    ?

    MIK
    If the section we a little oval you could radius the fwd face and plane the back side down...if it starts square, then you make it oval going athwartships if you plane the back side down. It's a good idea...we want to keep the spars flexible, but maybe this approach may be good when we are all using different wood species...even within species I have seen a lot of variation in stiffness/density. I'll get amazing tight grained spruce then I'll get this fat grained stuff that looks just like our pine.

    What about the boom? Maybe keep square or rectangular and sail with that and reduce dim's if necessary.

    Clint

  12. #71
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Portland, ME USA
    Posts
    837

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by woodeneye View Post
    Hi Mick
    I'm still toying with my flexi spars, and may glass them to stiffen them. Your plans mention to allow 50mm (2") deflection in the spars. How much weight would you say is needed to achieve this?
    Two thoughts...don't glass the spars! It can cause issues...sheathing the wood keeps IN any water that finds it's way there...you want the wood to be able to breathe. This is why I don't like to heavy a coat of epoxy on oars and spars. I'd sail with what you have...that flex is making the rig able to withstand a great range of wind conditions. Make a second set of spars, maybe starting at 50mm and using the technique MIK suggests above to toy with them.

    The other thought was in a 10-15 kt breeze MIK may see the 50mm deflection.

  13. #72
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Hunter Valley NSW
    Age
    69
    Posts
    1,759

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Compass Project View Post
    Two thoughts...don't glass the spars! It can cause issues...sheathing the wood keeps IN any water that finds it's way there...you want the wood to be able to breathe. This is why I don't like to heavy a coat of epoxy on oars and spars. I'd sail with what you have...that flex is making the rig able to withstand a great range of wind conditions. Make a second set of spars, maybe starting at 50mm and using the technique MIK suggests above to toy with them.

    The other thought was in a 10-15 kt breeze MIK may see the 50mm deflection.
    Yes, I'm inclined to believe that glassing the spars is not the way to go, and I'll make a second set.


    I'm looking forward to the arrival of my marine ply so I can get stuck into building the hull. I'm using Joubert Okoume (Gaboon) marine ply, which I'm sourcing from Denman Marine in Tassie.


    This weekend I completed a couple more fiddly bits.


    The mast received its final coat of Marine polyurethane clear varnish (7 coats on top of the 3 coats of epoxy).
    I made the stem from Paulownia. This needed careful planing with my no. 4 to get the taper right. If you look closely, you'll see the sort of "twist" that this taper induces. Clamping such a shape is impossible so I used long panel pins to hold it to my sawhorse while I planed. I was careful to punch the pins deep enough to prevent the plane blade striking the nails.


    I also made the tiller from Hoop pine with Paulownia infills. This will connect to the rudder stock when I make that. It now has 2 coats of epoxy.




    Being short of stuff to do at the moment, I found my old chisels in the clutter of my tool cupboard. These did not receive the best of treatment when I was repairing cricket bats a few years ago and had built up a goodly layer of glue which had promoted rust. They cleaned up nicely with a wire wheel and then I took them to my diamond stones for sharpening, so now I have some nice, gleaming and sharp chisels, ready to take on the Goat

  14. #73
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Netherlands
    Age
    67
    Posts
    248

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Compass Project View Post
    If the section we a little oval you could radius the fwd face and plane the back side down...if it starts square, then you make it oval going athwartships if you plane the back side down. It's a good idea...we want to keep the spars flexible, but maybe this approach may be good when we are all using different wood species...even within species I have seen a lot of variation in stiffness/density. I'll get amazing tight grained spruce then I'll get this fat grained stuff that looks just like our pine.

    What about the boom? Maybe keep square or rectangular and sail with that and reduce dim's if necessary.

    Clint
    Hi Clint,
    I am considering to make a square hollow boom. I have ordered a loose-footed sail, so boom-stiffness is very critical for me. But also in general I like to have a boom as stiff as possible and use a flexible yard only.
    I already made a square boom with rounded corners about 65x35 max in the center back to 50x35 in the front and 40x35 in the back end.......but I do not like the weight.
    It's not a real issue ( will be around 4kg ) but it could be made better.

    I have found a source of very nice 69x12 planks ( again cheap European Fir ) with 360 length. Two of these with 18mm infill and a spacers can make a very stiff and lighter boom. I am thinking to keep the top line straight and make a tapered bottum line with the max height somewere around 40% from the front of the boom. Sizes 42 x 69 max ( or slightly lower ) tapered towards 42x 40/50-ish in the ends.

    Not the highest priority project yet, since I need to finish my hull first.

    NB I have copied this into Joost interesting new Thread about GIS Spars !

  15. #74
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    'Delaide, Australia
    Age
    65
    Posts
    8,138

    Default

    A nice way of building a hollow boom is with timber on top and bottom and thin ply on the sides. The depth can be increased significantly without increasing weight.

    MIK

  16. #75
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Netherlands
    Age
    67
    Posts
    248

    Default

    Hi MIK,

    I have thought about that too, but I like the looks of a more "classic" square with round corners. But I have to admit that these ply sides probably make a very light boom.

Page 5 of 44 FirstFirst 1234567891015 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Loking for Plywood Sheets - Hunter Valley
    By Rabbs in forum BOAT RESOURCES / PRODUCT SEARCH
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 14th October 2009, 06:07 PM
  2. Hunter Valley to Sydney - NOT via F3?
    By I_wanna_Shed in forum TRAVEL
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 30th December 2007, 03:21 PM
  3. Property Search - Hunter Valley
    By Benniee in forum FORESTRY MANAGEMENT
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 5th August 2007, 08:06 PM
  4. Boat Building Autumn School - Adelaide, Australia, April
    By Boatmik in forum BOAT BUILDING / REPAIRING
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 29th January 2007, 08:30 AM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 28th January 2007, 03:11 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •