Thread: Camera restoration

Wow, what a beaut camera. I have a couple of much smaller wet plate and early dry plate cameras in mahogany.

My cameras have an original shellac finish, but not a high gloss finish so reflections are not an issue. If you use shellac you can modify the finish to whatever sheen you want by the number of coats and, if necessary, by cutting back with 0000 steel wool to the desired satin. Shellac dries quickly and when you do not want a high gloss French Polish finish you can get away with using a very fine natural hair brush like the Leonhardy brand brushes sold by The Gold Leaf factory (www.goldleaf.com.au). I have no affiliation but have bought some beautiful squirrel hair and badger hair brushes from them.

Hope this helps. It will look amazing when finished.

David

Sorry, the second (or actually the first part) of your question in regard to the stain. I am of the opinion that old things should look old and have some patina, i.e. signs of age. I am not therefore concerned about some unevenness or mottling in colouration. A totally even colour and finish makes something look new.

I'm not sure if wiping some darker stain over the cherry will make it the same, or make it even, but a little bit of extra stain will help to tone the stand in. If they are different timbers they will have always looked at least slightly different. It is not a good idea to use so much stain that there is no sign of the timber - it looks fake or replaced.

if I am repairing an item and have to replace a piece it is often hard to find the exact same depth of colour as the old timbers. In that case I use a spirit stain to deepen the colour of the replacement part, but always accept that the replacement will show to some extent (especially in photos) and that is Ok because it is part of the items history.

Originally Posted by Xanthorrhoeas

Wow, what a beaut camera. I have a couple of much smaller wet plate and early dry plate cameras in mahogany.

My cameras have an original shellac finish, but not a high gloss finish so reflections are not an issue. If you use shellac you can modify the finish to whatever sheen you want by the number of coats and, if necessary, by cutting back with 0000 steel wool to the desired satin. Shellac dries quickly and when you do not want a high gloss French Polish finish you can get away with using a very fine natural hair brush like the Leonhardy brand brushes sold by The Gold Leaf factory (www.goldleaf.com.au). I have no affiliation but have bought some beautiful squirrel hair and badger hair brushes from them.

Hope this helps. It will look amazing when finished.

David

Thanks David and first question to you is Do you use them? I have been shooting wet plate for a while now (far from an expert lol) and nothing compares, they are beautiful images. I usually shoot on black aluminium but have recently shot some on glass and believe me that is beyond words!
I agree fully that I don't want to make it look like new, just trying to replicate what is there. Any period catalogs that I can find only mention a spirit stain and then lacquered, I would have imagined that a full shellac finish (I realise you are not talking french polished) would not have worn well, isn't it very susceptible to moisture and spills etc? Some of the chems used in wet plate are pretty nasty, lots of alchahol and ether not to mention the really good stuff like cyanide etc (although that doesn't get near the camera, some use it for developing).
Maybe the shellac and a wax over the top of it? Thanks for the tip on the brushes too.
Michael

Getting there....
Michael

It's really looking good....

Just need to make a lens board and a film back, lens is winging its way from Germany as I type then it will be shooting home made glass plates by Chrissy.
Michael

A magnificent camera in it's restoration. Thanks for the pictures.
Alas but I shoot relatively modern 4x5 sheet in several cameras.

That looks absolutely fantastic

Originally Posted by mikl

Just need to make a lens board and a film back, lens is winging its way from Germany as I type then it will be shooting home made glass plates by Chrissy.
Michael

As the film size for these cameras is a nominal 8x10" or, as in one case I have personally seen on one of these cameras, Full Plate (8½ x 6½"), I was wondering what lens you have obtained for this beast?

Asks he, who only has three little 4x5" cameras around the place.

Home made glass plates, eh?

I worked in a Graphic Arts trade house in the seventies in Melbourne, around 1975 was the last year we hand coated our own glass plates, shortly after that time, we stopped using glass and changed to sheet film for all processes from then on.

Mick.

Let's guess on his lens = I say in the 400-450mm range. I've got a few from a Rhodie 210 down to a Schneider 90 in a recessed board for my 4x5's.
We used glass plates in the Siemens electron microscope/Botany Dept/LaTrobe until after I left in '72.
I would love to mess with hand coated glass plates. Terrible gap in my photographic experience.

I have a 480mm 3.8 barrel lens coming (actually from a projector) so you were close! I love razor sharp and need the huge opening for the collodion as it only registers at .5..... yes 1/2 ..... ISO, have to wait and see just how shallow that depth of field is. I may look into cutting a slot in the side of it and making some Waterhouse stops for it but have to have a look at how it all assembles. I have a Toyo 8x10 that as soon as I make myself a portable darkroom will be venturing out doors with. I have a 240 5.6 and a 135 5.6 for that and the big fellah will probably be mounted on a Toyo board but will make a 9 inch board for the old Kodak that will take the Toyo board for easy swap overs. As you are curious I will bung up a pic when it gets in my hot little hands.
Don't tell anyone but I go to the op shop next door and get all their old picture frames and re cycle the glass lol. Come down some time and I will give you guys a demo and Mick I have a 4x5 plate back (a modified polaroid back) here so bring your gear!
I have hardly picked up the digital since trying out the wet plate process.
Michael

3.8? Goodness! Is the thing on wheels? What with the emulsion speed, can you get away with using the lens cap as a shutter?

The Ilford emulsion on the electron microscope plates worked out to be about ASA 3 (Kodak Tri X was 400).
We fooled with a few to make some pinhole images, too.

Cameras and emulsions like that documented the settlement push west in North America, gold rushes included.

It is big lol, 135 diameter so will probably just fit on the Toyo board but the old Kodak has a 9 inch board so plenty of room. Yes lens cap as a shutter, most exposures are in the 3-5 second range so that should be no issue and if it is I have a Packard shutter that sits behind inside the camera. The sensitivity of the plates ends up a combination of age of the collodion and temperature etc so you always need to do a few plates to get exposure right (unless you use lights but you need upwards of 4800 w/s at a minimum as it only reacts to UV and blue. It is a fun process!
Michael

APUG = Analog Photography Users Group. Good site with something for everyone analog.
Bunch of people messing with platinum process and other home-brew emulsions.
I'll bet there's a gang of collodion users, too.

I got a couple of boxes of 5" x 7" sheet film. joined in with APUG.
Bought some fresh chems in June and considered doing some more serious pinhole work.