Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Needs Pictures: 0
Picture(s) thanks: 0
Results 1 to 14 of 14
-
7th July 2006, 12:53 AM #1
Scrolling 2" thick... is it practical?
I'm planning on making a wooden box for chess-men, at this stage it's just head-work, checking that it'll be feasible to do what I plan.
It'll be a round box, about 12" dia and 3" high and externally turned on a lathe. Inside, each chessman will go into it's own individual compartment, sort of like a honeycomb only using teardop shapes in a radial pattern. Hard to describe, but I know what I mean. The top & bottom 1/2" of the disk will be BSawn off first, for later re-attachment as the top/bottom with a bit of grain-matching and some final lathe work.
My question? Is it practical to scroll the teardrops out of a 12"dia by 2" blank, which'd then be split into two disks later on the bandsaw? Or would I be better off splitting the blank into two 1" disks and scrolling each individually? I'd prefer the former, not so much for speed (I suspect it'd actually be waaay slower...) but because I know the top/bottom would match more accurately.
2" is right at the limit of my scrollsaw, I may have to trim 1/4" or so for it to fit. That's fine by me, what else are thicknessers for? I can make up the difference in the top and/or bottom anyway. So far the thickest piece I've scrolled was 1" so I'm not sure what to expect with thicker timbers. Is it even feasible? What blades would be best? Any other potential problems I'm missing?
Errrmmm... help?
- Andy Mc
-
7th July 2006 12:53 AM # ADSGoogle Adsense Advertisement
- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Age
- 2010
- Posts
- Many
-
7th July 2006, 01:12 AM #2
Skew 2" is doable just slow I have done 2" 3d stuff and it depends on the timber but dont push it too hard and you should be ok though it may depend on your saw
PeteWhat this country needs are more unemployed politicians.
Edward Langley, Artist (1928-1995)
-
7th July 2006, 04:13 AM #3Novice
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Location
- UK
- Posts
- 20
I suggest you use a skip tooth blade to help clear the swarf away as you cut.
Gill
-
7th July 2006, 08:56 AM #4
I have done 2"+ redgum and used a blade with BIG teeth, even a piece of 1/8" bandsaw blade can be persuaded to fit into the blade holders, I have done that on my dewally, just don't expect tight turns if you choose this option.
Stupidity kills. Absolute stupidity kills absolutely.
-
7th July 2006, 07:57 PM #5
Thanks fellas. I was a tad worried that I'd start and discover it wasn't doable.
A skip tooth, eh? Another one for the new tool queue.
- Andy Mc
-
7th July 2006, 11:10 PM #6
You may be able to lessen the load by drilling the round end of the teardrops first, and then, just sawing out the pointy end. (Naval Term).
Buzza.
-
8th July 2006, 09:39 AM #7Originally Posted by Buzza
I'll take a bow for that if I don't get any stern looksStupidity kills. Absolute stupidity kills absolutely.
-
8th July 2006, 04:58 PM #8Originally Posted by Buzza
- Andy Mc
-
8th July 2006, 09:14 PM #9
There's a new way of drilling where you drill most of the way through, and when the pointy bit of the auger just shows through, turn the piece over, and drill through from the other side. I won't be taking a bow for giving that out either.:eek:
Buzza.
-
8th July 2006, 09:24 PM #10
Skew, it's pretty quick to touch up the spurs on an auger bit with a file, I managed to resurrect an oldie (about 1 1/8") this week by doing just that, as well as diamond stoning the cutting lips, & also "sharpening" the threads on the screw with a triangular file.
Cuts like a champ now, not bad for an old bit that had the sqaure drive for a brace (cut it off to fit the leccy drill). Cut 60 odd holes in oregon for my wip wood rack no probs.
The other option could be to do them with a spade bit, sharpen the outer edges with a chainsaw file so it has nice sharp spurs that'll give you a clean entry hole.
Cheers.................Sean
The beatings will continue until morale improves.
-
9th July 2006, 03:59 AM #11
Skew, Watch your fingers.......lol I have cut 2" deep on my saw and it suppose to be capable of cutting 2-5/8". Smacked my fingers good cause I got them to close to the arm.....Definitely go with a skip tooth and the largest blade you can make the turns with....I would suggest a #7 or #9 if you can make the turns with a #9. Softer wood will help you with the thickness....Lots of clear tape to prevent burning. (bees wax on the blade will work also). Make sure your table is square to the blade and don't hurry..Good luck with this one....I know it will be slow going on the saw.....
Drilling the hole out first one way or another would be the easiest way to go....even if you did the hole smaller and then scrolled it to size....Taking your time you can shave wood with a scrollsaw blade...and smooth out roughness from dull bits...try it on a piece of scrap to see if you can do it...
Lin
As an after thought....If you end up cutting 1.75"...like you suggested as a possiblility....you will find that 1/4" less is much easier to cut thru and handle than 2" thick. You wouldn't think 1/4" makes much difference...but on a scrollsaw it seems to....show up in how fast you can feed your wood and making tighter turns....
-
9th July 2006, 07:43 PM #12Originally Posted by Buzza
Watch your fingers.......lol I have cut 2" deep on my saw and it suppose to be capable of cutting 2-5/8". Smacked my fingers good cause I got them to close to the arm.....Definitely go with a skip tooth and the largest blade you can make the turns with....I would suggest a #7 or #9 if you can make the turns with a #9. Softer wood will help you with the thickness....Lots of clear tape to prevent burning. (bees wax on the blade will work also). Make sure your table is square to the blade and don't hurry..Good luck with this one....I know it will be slow going on the saw.....
I am a tad worried about my table; as you know, the saw has been around at an engineer mates' for some mods so I can cut goblets on it. He's barely started, no spare time... except for cutting away the table mounts! :eek: I've jury-rigged a mount from timber packers: it seems to be sitting square but I'm not sure how it'll stand up to the vibration. [fingers Xed] Hopefully there'll be no disasters involving fingers in the offing!
As an after thought....If you end up cutting 1.75"...like you suggested as a possiblility....you will find that 1/4" less is much easier to cut thru and handle than 2" thick. You wouldn't think 1/4" makes much difference...but on a scrollsaw it seems to....show up in how fast you can feed your wood and making tighter turns....
- Andy Mc
-
10th July 2006, 12:13 AM #13
I'd go with the thinner wood.... if your table isn't 100% spot on square and if you push just a little too hard your pieces after slicing won't match... the bottom cut out will be smaller.
I've cut lots of 3/4" puzzles and even then if the table was just a tiny bit off things won't fit... with my Delta I don't think I'd even try 2".
good luck
Juvy
-
10th July 2006, 09:17 PM #14
Skew, you might want to track down a recent thread by Lignum about a table he has mounted separately to his scrollsaw.
He did it to give a bigger working surface with no vibration, could be good for yours with the table mounts gone AWOL
Cheers..................Sean
The beatings will continue until morale improves.
Similar Threads
-
Where can I get a short thick tube
By Arron in forum WOODWORK - GENERALReplies: 7Last Post: 2nd January 2005, 09:47 AM -
slicing thick timber
By EMistral in forum TIMBERReplies: 7Last Post: 15th April 2004, 07:36 PM