Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Needs Pictures Needs Pictures:  0
Picture(s) thanks Picture(s) thanks:  0
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    45

    Default Another boring DC question - Cyclone & DC Setup - Air Straightener

    Hi guys,


    Feeling a bit dejected at the moment. Basically, started to re configure my Super Dust deputy and Carbatec 2HP DC to make some more room in the workshop. To start, I won't pretend to understand all the physics that come into play when designing a truly efficient DC system. I understand the usual stuff like 6 inch over 4 inch line and minimal bends in lines that don't have 90 degree elbows etc. etc. to maximize efficiency.
    All I want is to minimize dust that is created and spread around my workshop not to have a 100% dust free environment which is unrealistic. I have a room air filter and I also use PPE which is the most important and cheapest piece of equipment you can own.
    I have had the SSD and DC for a while now but I have now removed the impeller from the rolling base and made my system into a more vertical/tower configuration as per the attached image that is separated by approx. 500mm of 6 inch tubing. Whilst doing this I actual took more notice of the inlet on the SDD and the rotation marking on the impeller. Again, I am not that experienced with DC systems but this did grab my attention so what did I do, I resorted to good 'ol Google to research whether this would impact on performance and I seem to have opened Pandora's box.
    I am trying to consolidate everything here from I have read to get a better understanding of what to do now and ask for some better informed guidance. Hopefully this may also help others that find themselves in the same situation.


    In summary, the SDD has been designed to spin the moving air CCW and I never really took any notice of this when I first connected up by DC system as i just connected everything together and thought "yeah it seems to work ok". The rotation of my impeller is going the opposite direction and from what I have read this is bad. The motor will draw more current as it is now working harder to rotate the spinning air from the cyclone to the impeller. This in turn creates turbulence, introduces major SP and massive drops in overall CFM.


    It appears I have limited options as I can not afford to by a new Cyclone or a different motor at this time.


    I looks like I can either:
    1. Leave it the way it is and put up with the current suction I have at my machines (hoping I don't damage the motor)
    2. Put the actual DC back together. Some guys have said that introducing a longer length of hose between the impeller and cyclone removes/minimises the issue that is created by coupling the motor directly to the top of the cyclone. Not sure how accurate this is?
    3. Install some sort of air straightener into the pipework between the cyclone and motor to neutralize the spinning air even though this still creates a small amount of suction loss


    If I go with option 3 I can't find enough information on this other than to either using a cluster of plastic tubing or a cross formation made from sheet metal to accomplish this (I have attached my interpretation of this). I was hoping that some forum members have done this and and can provide some feedback as I am lost with all the science and figures that seem to be circulating around.


    I.e. How have people done this? What was the length of the tubing? Where does it get inserted? How is it fixed inside the cyclone or pipe work etc.


    BobL seems to have a wealth of knowledge on this topic so I would appreciate any feedback you may have on this (recycled) topic as I am a little lost


    Thanks in advance.


    Cheers


    Trav
    Attached Images Attached Images

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    27,785

    Default

    Two things I can see immediately

    1) As soon as you have 4" ducting anywhere in a DE system it matters very little what size ducting is used elsewhere - the 4" acts like a rate limiting step so 425CFM is the max flow no matter what else is used.

    3) Using an SSD with the air spinning in the correct direction will rob a further 20-25% of the flow so you will be then down to ~350 CFM or about a factor of 3 less than the minimum requirement for fine dust control.
    Air spinning in the wrong direction will drop the flow even further
    Yes they do keep filters cleaner for longer but what's the point if a significant proportion of the fine dust is never captured and being left behind in the shed?

    The best flow that can be achieved with a standard 2HP is using the modification to the input and output of the Generic 2HP impeller as per the sticky at the top of this forum.
    With a pleated filter up to 925CFM cam be obtained provided
    - 6" ducting is used through out
    - no chip collector or small cyclones are included
    - machine ports are opened up to avail themselves of the flow - if you are not prepared to do this then don't bother with the rest

    Yes you will have to keep your filters clean but it shouldn't be too bad as you have a pleated filter.

    The problem with your particular model of the 2HP is the fixed size of the impeller outlet (~5") which limits the flow to less than 800 CFM.
    The other 2HP DC have a rectangular equivalent that is is almost 6" which is how they can get the greater flow.
    Major metal working surgery could be used to open that up your impeller outlet but that is really for you to determine

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    45

    Default

    Thanks BobL.

    Some very blunt but informative points which I was hoping for. I had know idea how much loss would be introduced by the inclusion of a cyclone.

    It looks like I have some work ahead of me.

    Thanks again for taking the time to respond.

    Cheers Pal.

    Trav

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    27,785

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TBM1 View Post
    Thanks BobL.

    Some very blunt but informative points which I was hoping for. I had know idea how much loss would be introduced by the inclusion of a cyclone.
    Sorry if I sounded a little blunt.
    Hope you can work something out.

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Fort Saskatchewan, AB
    Posts
    79

    Default

    Having never looked inside of a SDD, have you confirmed that the exit from the cyclone is in fact directional.
    I have a a ClearVue CV1800 and an original CV Mini, so can see the activity in cyclone body.
    Both of these cyclones have length of straight tubing positioned in the center of the vortex, leading to the exit. The air stream is forced to abruptly change direction as it moves to the fan.
    You can confirm this with Oneida, but I doubt that the direction of fan spin has little effect on the performance of this device. It is designed for and used in hundreds, if not thousands of configurations just like yours.
    As well, you appear to have enough straight hose between your SDD and fan to level out any turbulence in the air stream. Replacing as much flex hose as you can with smooth walled pipe will gain some benefit. You have 3 floppy elbow in your setup.

    As Bob notes, you can only do so much with 4" runs. If you have come across Bill Pentz site, find his static calculator. Enter you system components as configured for 4, 5 and 6" sytems. The differences sre amazing.
    If you are getting dust in your waste bin and little carry over into your filter, then I would suggest your system is doing the best it can.
    Don

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    45

    Default

    Hi Don,

    Thank you for the feedback. The SDD is quite simplistic in design even though quite effective. The exit pipe being 6 inch just goes straight into the body of the cyclone but I have not taken a measurement of that length.

    The impeller housing inlet is 6 inch but unfortunately the outlet to the filter is only 5 and from what I have seen, it is going to be major surgery (as BobL states) to open this up. That said, I still intend to replace all my 4 inch lines with 6inch/150mm PVC pipe with 45 degree bends. I got pricing from a plumbing supplier and it actually works out to be approx. $13 per meter of solid pipe compared to $32 per meter of the flex tubing that most wood working suppliers sell which sold me on the upgrade. It's the fittings that make the transition an expensive one! The is a perfect example of do it once and do it right. It is just a shame that I never knew about sizing or the basic principles when I first set up my system so now I have about $500 worth of 100mm stuff I am stuck with.

    I am going to lower the impeller which is going to shorten the 6 inch hose that connects the SDD to the motor slightly but this is so I can get a straighter connection point between the impeller outlet and the filter/collection bag housing.
    I should have installed the filter and bag first then lined up my motor to suit but lesson learned.

    Hopefully I will see a benefit going to the larger pipe work even though its hard to run tests without any testing equipment, but I am now a little more educated on what to look for in my overall DC system to remove possible choke points on the dust collection. Now that BobL raised the fact the SDD does choke the system somewhat I tested that by simply putting my hand over inlet of the SDD when running. I also just turned the DC on briefly without the SDD and the suction from the 6 inch hose that connects the two was huge. I never realized how much the SDD inline with my equipment would affected the CFM as it does but it is definitely worth having for the sake of separation and clogging filters IMO.


    In regards to any bypass, I don't have a workshop full of gear ATM but the usual, TS, Thicknesser, SAWs etc. and what ends up in the bag is the smallest fines almost like talcum powder that just sits in the bottom. Everything else (other than the nasty stuff we can't see but try to capture) ends up in the collection tub so it is performing reasonably well.

    I have just put the pleated filter on so I haven't had a chance to see whether this also helps with airflow and performance. If I were in a position to, I would have built a separate shed to house the DC but for now it will have to remain in the workshop.

    Thanks again. I respect everyone's opinion on this forum.

Similar Threads

  1. Modification to default DC & Cyclone setup. Viable?
    By Tobster in forum DUST EXTRACTION
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 31st March 2015, 10:09 PM
  2. Boring question.
    By Hoofie in forum METALWORK FORUM
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12th September 2012, 05:38 PM
  3. Yet another CTC boring head question.
    By Anorak Bob in forum METALWORK FORUM
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 23rd February 2012, 12:58 AM
  4. Rip Fence Straightener (Ryobi ETS1526AL)
    By RedShirtGuy in forum TABLE SAWS & COMBINATIONS
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 20th January 2009, 09:58 PM
  5. my clearvue cyclone setup.
    By JDarvall in forum DUST EXTRACTION
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 18th January 2009, 07:05 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •