Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Needs Pictures Needs Pictures:  0
Picture(s) thanks Picture(s) thanks:  0
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Adelaide, South Awstraylia.
    Age
    63
    Posts
    290

    Default Cyclone Main Duct

    I have installed my Cyclone in the centre of the shed at one end. I m thinking of running the main 8" line down the centre and then branching of to the sides for the machines, except for the TS as this is nearly central.

    This would mean running the 6" branch for just under 3m horizontal before dropping down a couple of meters. Does this sound reasonable?

    Whaddya think Dust Guru Bob? Any problems with these distances?

    the other option is to run the main right around the shed, much longer and more bends.
    Try to look unimportant, they may be low on ammo.

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Age
    2010
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    27,794

    Default

    Any level of redundancy you want to include is really up to the shed owner.
    If you think there's a good chance you can use it soonish and you have the time and $ and . . . . . then it's probably a good idea.

    The main reason for running 8" close to the TS would be to get 6" direct from the 8" direct to the cabinet and another 6" (or at least a 4") also direct from the 8" direct to the saw guard - that gives you max air flow to catch as much fine dust as possible. If you run 6" up to the saw and tap off a 4" from the 6" then you will have less total airflow.

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Adelaide, South Awstraylia.
    Age
    63
    Posts
    290

    Default

    Thanks Bob, quick response as always.

    Your reply has confused me some what though. You mentioned redundancy? I'm not sure what you mean by this. I'm only running the one main down the middle with the drop down branching off to the sides horizontally before actually heading downward. My main concern was that because I was running down the centre of the shed, the length of the horizontal component would be around 3m.

    Mr Pentz recommends running the drop down horizontal for a while prior to heading down but I wasn't sure if 3m was too much.

    As for using two 6" for the TS, I was going to do exactly that with the overhead one for the blade guard being open most of the time as a scrubber for other machines etc, possibly designed so it can be adjusted quite high whilst scrubbing.

    Cheers again Bob for being on tap for dusty questions. Bill's site is a great resource but sometimes it seems there is too much information, it really is rocket science.
    Try to look unimportant, they may be low on ammo.

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    27,794

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RicB View Post
    You mentioned redundancy? I'm not sure what you mean by this. I'm only running the one main down the middle with the drop down branching off to the sides horizontally before actually heading downward. My main concern was that because I was running down the centre of the shed, the length of the horizontal component would be around 3m.
    Sorry I mistook what you meant by "centre". I had in mind that you were considering running 8" to the centre of the shed and then branching out from there with 6" because you only had one machine (the TS) at the other end of the shed. Like the diagram on the left
    shedDClayout.jpg
    Whereas it sounds like you are going to be doing the setup on the right?

    Mr Pentz recommends running the drop down horizontal for a while prior to heading down but I wasn't sure if 3m was too much.
    it should be fine

    As for using two 6" for the TS, I was going to do exactly that with the overhead one for the blade guard being open most of the time as a scrubber for other machines etc, possibly designed so it can be adjusted quite high whilst scrubbing.


    Cheers again Bob for being on tap for dusty questions. Bill's site is a great resource but sometimes it seems there is too much information, it really is rocket science.
    BP's stuff on the web is information rich but written and formatted more for a text book than the web. IMHO no matter what material is being presented on the web, it should be written quite differently.

Similar Threads

  1. My DC set up, Jet 3HP Cyclone and 6" duct.
    By Jack E in forum DUST EXTRACTION
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 31st May 2013, 09:03 PM
  2. Replies: 47
    Last Post: 29th May 2009, 05:05 PM
  3. Main HDD failure
    By ubeaut in forum FORUMS INFO, HELP, DISCUSSION & FEEDBACK
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 29th April 2007, 11:31 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •