Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 83
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    27,792

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ian Dobson View Post
    The shed out back is a 1.5m x 0.75m Colorbond garden shed, with no rear wall (it's bolted onto the brick rear wall of the garage). What do you suggest as the best material to use for adding weight/sound deadening to the walls?
    A plain Colorbond shed will ring like a bell. For weight I suggest using scrap MDF but anything solid with weight, plaster board etc Ideally the enclosure also should be near air tight and the the air escape via a baffled box.

    My enclosure is also bolted to the wall of my shed.
    I have Colorbond, 32 mm of Scrap melamine, 50 mm of Acoustic Rockwool and then 16 mm of Scrap MDF and then 50 mm of mattress foam. The reason for all this is enclosure is right next to my fence and the neighbours pool is immediately on the other side of the fence.

    I agree using a longer mould would make a smoother transition. But in this case it's a bit more complicated than a bell mouth as the vertical dimension (as shown in photo above) is 105mm which is smaller than the pipe diameter. A form that started to fit the round pipe and ended as the rectangle shape would have to be either made in multiple parts, or destroyed to get it out of the formed pipe.
    Yeah those ones are buggers to do because if a solid former is used as I suggest the former cannot be removed from the pipe!
    The only way to do those with a proper transition is with a collapsible former

    In this case to keep things simple, after getting the end into rectangular shape, I have taken the pipe off the former, and reheated it (not at the very end, but from a couple of inches down), and used an oven mitt pressing from the inside to smooth out the transitions on each corner.
    Makes sense.

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Perth WA Australia
    Posts
    829

    Default

    Also take into consideration the machinery you have/plan on having. If you spend considerable amount of time chiseling or angle grinding or using a circular saw putting all your efforts into absorbing the sound a dusty makes, will have a limited effect on the number of times your neighbor will come knocking on your door.

    Obviously something is better than nothing but for me when my thicky is on I just hope no one within 50m radius is trying to sleep.

  4. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Sydney Upper North Shore
    Posts
    4,470

    Default

    I made an inner and outer mould to form mine. Only used a standard heat gun and had no problems. Cant find the outer mould but it was just a rectangular hole in a 17mm piece of ply wood. The the hole was larger than the inner mould by two times the thickness of the pipe plus an additional 1 mm. I used the larger joint end of 150mm pipe.


    IMG_0983.jpgIMG_0521.jpg

    It was sealed and screwed into a timber flange. This is it fitted.

    IMG_0980.jpg

  5. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    42

    Default

    A bit more context ... this is the back wall of my garage with the shed behind it. On the right is the boundary fence with my neighbour's outdoor entertainment area behind it.

    My plan is to remove the lower fixed glass pane of the window and run the ducting through an acrylic sheet with a 160mm hole in it, then turn 90 degrees with a hole in the left side of the shed.

    It's either that or try my hand at some brickwork, and the wall is full of obstacles including electrical wiring and water pipes, so I'm not very keen on that idea.

    I'll do the 90 degree bend with a couple of 45's.

    Any suggestions?
    Attached Images Attached Images

  6. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    27,792

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ian Dobson View Post
    My plan is to remove the lower fixed glass pane of the window and run the ducting through an acrylic sheet with a 160mm hole in it, then turn 90 degrees with a hole in the left side of the shed.
    Sounds like a plan


    I'll do the 90 degree bend with a couple of 45's.
    A large radius 90º bend will be better than 2 x 45º bends.

    You'll need a way for the air and as little sound as possible to get out of the enclosure.

  7. #21
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    42

    Default

    > A large radius 90º bend will be better than 2 x 45º bends

    I'm not sure how I'd do that. DWV and storm fittings don't come in large radius bends. I could try filling the pipe with sand to stop it kinking, and then using the heat gun on it, but I don't have a mandrel bender for anything like that size and my heat gun doesn't cover a large area at any one time. I see there are large radius 150mm electrical conduit 90's (exxy $$$) but am not sure if they are sized to interface with 150mm stormwater pipe (160mm o.d.).

  8. #22
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    27,792

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ian Dobson View Post
    > A large radius 90º bend will be better than 2 x 45º bends

    I'm not sure how I'd do that. DWV and storm fittings don't come in large radius bends. I could try filling the pipe with sand to stop it kinking, and then using the heat gun on it, but I don't have a mandrel bender for anything like that size and my heat gun doesn't cover a large area at any one time. I see there are large radius 150mm electrical conduit 90's (exxy $$$) but am not sure if they are sized to interface with 150mm stormwater pipe (160mm o.d.).
    Sorry I should have provided more detail.

    Standard Stormwater 90º bends look like this.
    The bend radius is equivalent to the radius of the pipe - its called a 1R bend
    STORMWATER_BENDS.jpg

    DVW 90º bends come in two sorts, a 1R bend the same as the stormwater and a 2R bend like this.
    DWV_PLAIN_BEND.jpg

    My testing shows that 2R bends only lose about 1% of the flow whereas the 1R lose 7% of the flow.
    It doesn't sound like much until you have to use a few bends and then it all adds up

  9. #23
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    42

    Default

    Oh, ok thanks.

    I had assumed that two 45 degree bends would lose less flow than even the 2R 90 degree bend. But if the 2R 90 will only drop 1% of the flow, that's easier to do (and cheaper too).

    My impeller & motor will be in the garage, directly inside from the window. I had planned to mount these onto a vertical framework so the exit duct off the impeller can head straight out through the window without having to make any 90 degree turns.

    Between the window and the shed I might need a 15 degree elbow so the pipe can enter the shed at the same height as the bag/collector input duct.

  10. #24
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    27,792

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ian Dobson View Post
    I had assumed that two 45 degree bends would lose less flow than even the 2R 90 degree bend. But if the 2R 90 will only drop 1% of the flow, that's easier to do (and cheaper too).
    I also used to believe that until I tested it.
    It turns out that a 2R 90º (blue on graph) bend has about the same resistance as 1 x 45º (red_.
    The problem with the 45º bends is that they are not really smooth bends but 45º steps.
    2 x 45º (green) is better than a 1R 90º bend (purple).


    Air flow calibration measurements-150mmbends2-jpg

    Lots more data in this thread.
    Air flow calibration measurements
    Anyone starting out building a DC system could benefit by reading this thread.

  11. #25
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    42

    Default

    Thanks Bob, interesting reading & your expertise is most valued.

    In my setup, the ducting we are talking about is on the output side of the impeller - ie the airflow is being driven into the bend rather than sucked out of it. Do you think that would make any difference to the result? (just thinking this may make a difference, as there is no vacuum force pulling the dust around the bend)

  12. #26
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Perth WA Australia
    Posts
    829

    Default

    Thanks for this Bob very insightful.

    Are 2R 90 bends common? I don't recall ever seeing them at either Bunnings or loca ducting shop.

  13. #27
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    27,792

    Default

    In my setup, the ducting we are talking about is on the output side of the impeller - ie the airflow is being driven into the bend rather than sucked out of it. Do you think that would make any difference to the result? (just thinking this may make a difference, as there is no vacuum force pulling the dust around the bend)
    It doesn't make any difference. Air moves from higher to lower pressure - the air itself doesn't know whether it is being pushed or pulled - it just moves because of the pressure gradient.

    Quote Originally Posted by tonzeyd View Post
    Thanks for this Bob very insightful.
    Are 2R 90 bends common? I don't recall ever seeing them at either Bunnings or loca ducting shop.
    I would not recommend buying any PVC from Bunnings - way too expensive and very limited range.
    Pipeco (same as Pipeonline) in Welshpool have most of these PVC fittings.

  14. #28
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Perth WA Australia
    Posts
    829

    Default

    Thanks Bob, will need to keep my eyes open for them next time i visit Pipeco.

    I only use Bunnings when I'm in a hurry or if I only need a short length of pipe, obviously in an ideal world buying 6m lengths and having it sit around till i get around to expanding the ducting but I've got to share a house with one who'd rather not have it looking like an industrial warehouse (or junkyard for those who don't know what its intended purpose is).

  15. #29
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    42

    Default

    I'm working on the bag end of the pipe now - a short journey back to high school geometry and trigonometry to calculate the required curve to interface two cylinders.

    I'm sure there are online resources for this sort of stuff, but I enjoy nutting out stuff like this myself. Since I started woodworking a couple of years back, my high school maths has had quite a work out.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  16. #30
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    27,792

    Default

    I'm not quite sure what you mean by "interfacing two cylinders"?

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Moving on
    By Avery in forum NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH WOODWORK
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 13th February 2013, 11:33 PM
  2. Moving , moving ,moving
    By rodent in forum WOODTURNING - GENERAL
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 29th September 2008, 11:56 PM
  3. Moving On
    By echnidna in forum NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH WOODWORK
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 3rd May 2008, 03:43 PM
  4. moving m3 from Tas to Mel
    By Harry II in forum WOODWORK - GENERAL
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10th October 2006, 09:47 PM
  5. Moving PIC'S
    By disco in forum BOAT BUILDING / REPAIRING
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 12th December 2005, 10:04 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •