Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Needs Pictures Needs Pictures:  0
Picture(s) thanks Picture(s) thanks:  0
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 38

Thread: Slippery slope?

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Kettering, Tasmania
    Posts
    492

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Caliban View Post
    Thanks Andrew
    So if someone builds a canoe and someone buys it and hangs a motor off the side on a bracket clamped across both gunwhales, the builder is responsible? Or is that bracket a substantial enough alteration?
    Speaking of which, does anyone have any thoughts on the bhc by Jemwatersports?
    My understanding is that the original builder would not be responsible in this case. The regs make a provision for this by saying that on the ABP there should be -

    "A warning statement that if the boat is altered so that it is different to the
    Builders specifications, then the particulars specified on the ABP may
    be invalidated. "

    This makes sense otherwise someone could build a boat to the plan (say one of MIK's rowboats) and the next owner could modify it by building a pilot house on it () and when it all went pear shaped and an incident occurred, the poor original builder would be blamed. If you make mods to the boat that would change the design to the extent that the ABP data is no longer correct, the data required to be on the plate would need to be re-validated.

    MIK is correct on who can provide the data however in NSW they have gone one step further by specifying that the person providing the data must be approved by Maritime NSW. They haven't said who that is going to be yet but as mentioned below, NMSC believed that they were going to be NA's or Surveyors or similarly qualified. I guess MIK that as a designer, you would have a good case to be one of those people as well.

    Although it is more bureaucracy, it is a good thing for boating. The driver behind this has been the number of preventable deaths in boating where boats have been overloaded or over-powered or have inadequate buoyancy. In some of the paperwork on this, 40 people died in Australia in one year with boats <6m in length being the worse category.

    Although a lot of people probably wont read it, if there is a plate on the hull that advises maximum person, maximum horsepower etc some of these deaths may not occur in the future.

    As I mentioned below, if in doubt check directly with NMSC.


    The jemwatercraft BFC () Looks like an easy build but it is quite long to go on the roof. No room there for the outboard. Being so narrow she is not going to have the stability as something a bit wider like the Flint(below). I have heard that Flint rows really nicely.
    Fits on top of the car ok but definitely a two person lift.

    The beauty of going with one of our Aussie designers such as MIK, Mark, Ross, etc is that their plans are very comprehensive for builders and more importantly they are only a phone call away if you get stuck. Just because they don't have the plan on their website, they may have something on the drawing board or could draw something up to suit. They are very approachable so get on the phone/email them and discuss your requirements - at least this way you will get a boat that fits what you want to do.

    Don't let the ABP issue put you off a design - that is not the intent. Just be aware of what you will need come registration time - sort of like "buyer beware."

    So far you've said that the boat has to be able to go on the car roof racks and possibly use the 6hp outboard. What's the intended use - just pottering? a spot of fishing? what type of conditions did you want to operate in? I'd consider the use first then if a suitable boat didn't fit my roof racks, I would change the racks (not a biggie).

    AD
    www.denmanmarine.com.au
    Australian agent for Swallow Boats, Bruynzeel Multipanel Plywood and Barton Marine Products

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Kettering, Tasmania
    Posts
    492

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Caliban View Post
    I want a boat that can be car topped, used with a 6hp motor, rowed if necessary, can carry my wife and me and some fishing-picnic gear, doesn't need to win any races but does need to be dry, stable and not slam and bash like a punt does.
    .
    Caliban, I have just re-read your OP and answered my question regarding use. I'd definitely go for the extra beam that. Passengers of the female persuasion generally don't like "tippy" boats (lol)

    But as you are seeing, all choices are a compromise. The characteristics that make a boat a good rower are different to what makes her good under power. You'll need to trade one off for the other and think about how much you would row/power and what's your preference as this will dictate design parameters.

    AD
    www.denmanmarine.com.au
    Australian agent for Swallow Boats, Bruynzeel Multipanel Plywood and Barton Marine Products

  4. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    North Gosford
    Age
    66
    Posts
    128

    Default ABP's are not necessary in NSW,

    from what I can see on the NSW Maritime site,if the vessel doesn't need to be registered-which means keeping to a design under 5.5m and 5hp or less would get around it? Please correct me if I've got this wrong.
    Dave.

  5. #19
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Kettering, Tasmania
    Posts
    492

    Default

    G'day Dave,

    Unfortunately not. I have spoken with Maritime NSW and they see the ABP and rego as two seperate issues. They advised that all recreational craft except those on the exempt list require an ABP to be fitted whether they are registered or not.

    regards,

    AD
    www.denmanmarine.com.au
    Australian agent for Swallow Boats, Bruynzeel Multipanel Plywood and Barton Marine Products

  6. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Bundaberg
    Posts
    130

    Default

    G'day Everyone,
    All too often, when sourcing materials to build the boat, one of the most common materials to substituted is, the plywood. Usually when purchasing plans, it comes with a materials list and off we go making phone calls, pricing and ordering. The problem is, by substituting, you can effect the ABP.

    Recently a client who ( without my knowledge) had substituted Gabbon ply for hardwood plywood from his local hardware store. In days past, this would not have mattered to much ( providing it was still marine) However, the result was , the boat ended up heavier ( boat alone) For those who are not aware, in ABP calculations, the weight of the boat ( not displacement) and motor is the basis of the calculations.

    Alarm Bells !!!

    The result was, the ABP information provided initially was now no longer applicable and if he had not informed us, the result would have been wrong information being engraved on the plate.

    My suggestion is, if you have any intension of changing or modifying your power boat, or even substituting materials, I cannot stress enough that it is important that you consult your designer first. (ie Ross, Mik, myself, whoever.... it must however, be an Australian entity), in order that the plate info can be rechecked.. This is a policy that even Quintex alloy boats demand from their dealers, when clients wish to put additional items on board. It's all checked prior and if need be, a new plate is issued.

    This relationship however, can be good, as sometimes a client will have a great idea that eventually ends up becoming a part of the design. A win/ win situation.

    For those interested, one of the standards used for the plate is the ABYC
    "The ABYC (American Boating & Yachting Council) mission is to develop quality technical practices and engineering standards for the design, construction, maintenance and repair of small craft with reference to their safety.
    The Council shall also disseminate these standards and be the principal source of related technical information and education for the marine industry."
    Here's their link
    http://www.abycinc.org/

    In regards to the plate itself, it is YOUR name that goes in the "builders section", however, some states are now also requiring the name of the competent person, who supplied the ABP info, also be on the plate. (eg NSW, Qld) in this case, it would have to be Ross, Mik, myself, who ever is competent to provide the info.

    Obtaining a plate is easy. It cost $30 and for all States, to obtain a plate or, for more additional information, you can contact Amanda below at:
    Where can I obtain an Australian Builders Plate?
    Australian Marine Industries Federation* can provide information for ordering plates. Australian Marine Industries Federation can be contacted:

    http://www.amif.asn.au/home.1.html

    Office: Unit 14, 795 Beaufort Street, Mount Lawley, Western Australia 6050
    Telephone: +61 8 9371 8872z
    Facsimile: +61 8 9371 3973w

    Is it bureaucracy gone mad?? It can be. But it seems we're only just starting. At the last Naval Architect conference held last week, we were informed that there is now a world wide push for a single standard instead of the major 3 we now have. Does this mean that some time in the future, we'll have to go through all this again.!!!
    Time will tell.
    Regards
    Mark
    <a href="http://www.bowdidgemarinedesigns.com/">Mark's
    Boat Plans</a>

  7. #21
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Kempsey NSW
    Age
    66
    Posts
    1,140

    Default Slippery Indeed!

    Thanks everyone and Andrew in particular.
    The choice has narrowed.
    I either need (in no particular order)
    1. The Flint by Ross
    2. The skiff by Mark
    3. The rowboat by Mik
    4. The prototype v-nosed punt on Mark's drawing board.
    5. Something else, perhaps something like the shkiff by Uncle John's boats but redesigned by an Aussie.
    6. A custom designed car topper by any of you (and a new badge for my old evinrude to downgrade its power)
    7. A swift kick up the posterior

    Oh. I don't want to paint it. Timber is sooooo sexy. This means more Midge like worrying about end results.
    Slippery indeed.
    Last edited by Caliban; 21st May 2009 at 06:51 PM. Reason: More design parameters- aesthetics
    Cheers
    Jim

    "I see dumb peope!"

  8. #22
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    North Gosford
    Age
    66
    Posts
    128

    Default This is interesting-

    http://www.legislation.nsw.gov.au/fr...+2009+pt.3+0+N
    What are we to make of clause 46?Looks like a get out of gaol free card for craft not requiring registration to me at, first reading-and I presume this is the current legislation NSW Maritime is obliged to work from.Maybe something useful has come from Macquarie St for once.(Don't get me started on the marine reserve fiasco).
    Dave.

  9. #23
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Kettering, Tasmania
    Posts
    492

    Default

    Dave,

    It does read a little different at first glance but the senior fellow at Maritime NSW was adamant that even vessels not requiring rego were to have an ABP unless specifically excpeted by the legislation.

    I had to read the section a few times (its been a long day sanding) but I reckon what it is getting at is this.

    Section 45 says that if you have a vessel that requires an ABP, you can't sell it without the ABP or they nick you 50 penalty points (is that $5K??).

    I think what Section 46 is getting at is that an ABP is still required but if you are prosecuted for trying to sell your boat without an ABP, and you built the boat and have owned it for 5 years+ then this can be a defence to the prosecution.

    I don't know why it would be a defence and I don't know if I would like to try it out but it certainly does look fishy. I'd be writing to Maritime NSW for clarification before I'd run the gauntlet on this.

    Well picked up.

    Caliban,

    why not have one of each??

    AD
    www.denmanmarine.com.au
    Australian agent for Swallow Boats, Bruynzeel Multipanel Plywood and Barton Marine Products

  10. #24
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Kempsey NSW
    Age
    66
    Posts
    1,140

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bloggs1968 View Post
    Caliban,

    why not have one of each??

    AD
    If I did that then I could go to option 8 (which I deleted)
    8. a divorce and a single seat kayak
    Do not tell her I wrote that or I'll need a coffin.
    Cheers
    Jim

    "I see dumb peope!"

  11. #25
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Victoria
    Age
    71
    Posts
    631

    Default

    Too much windage in a coffin. Better to arrange burial in a boat, then you can have fun with it first.

  12. #26
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Bundaberg
    Posts
    130

    Default

    The coffin will give you grief Caliban, too much of a bow wave and will slam in chop ha ha
    <a href="http://www.bowdidgemarinedesigns.com/">Mark's
    Boat Plans</a>

  13. #27
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Kettering, Tasmania
    Posts
    492

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Caliban View Post
    If I did that then I could go to option 8 (which I deleted)
    8. a divorce and a single seat kayak
    Do not tell her I wrote that or I'll need a coffin.
    be easier to lift onto the roof racks..................

    AD
    www.denmanmarine.com.au
    Australian agent for Swallow Boats, Bruynzeel Multipanel Plywood and Barton Marine Products

  14. #28
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Kempsey NSW
    Age
    66
    Posts
    1,140

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bloggs1968 View Post
    be easier to lift onto the roof racks..................

    AD
    not if I'm in it

    I'm too heavy to lift myself...ah forget it, it's like standing in a bucket and trying to lift yourself
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    Sorry dead joke.
    Cheers
    Jim

    "I see dumb peope!"

  15. #29
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Kettering, Tasmania
    Posts
    492

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Caliban View Post
    not if I'm in it

    I'm too heavy to lift myself...ah forget it, it's like standing in a bucket and trying to lift yourself
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    Sorry dead joke.
    I was talking about the single person kayak mate.

    AD
    www.denmanmarine.com.au
    Australian agent for Swallow Boats, Bruynzeel Multipanel Plywood and Barton Marine Products

  16. #30
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Bundaberg
    Posts
    130

    Default

    Crikey Caliban,
    Coffin idea sounds great.

    Here's you coffin ABP plate numbers. Its for free !!

    Max HP = 2 HP
    max outboard weight = 14kg
    Max number of people ( would you believe) = 1 (ha ha)
    Max capacity = 59kg
    Fl;oation used : basic ( you'll need 3 ft^3 of foam)
    standard used : ABYC

    This an actual calculation would you believe. !!!
    Better let me know if your using brass handles, flowers etc as the numbers might change ha ha ha

    NO CHARGE HA HA HA

    regards
    mark
    <a href="http://www.bowdidgemarinedesigns.com/">Mark's
    Boat Plans</a>

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Slippery Slope
    By ozwinner in forum WOODWORK - GENERAL
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 8th February 2007, 04:58 PM
  2. A first step on the slippery slope
    By Rocker in forum HOMEMADE TOOLS AND JIGS ETC.
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 25th September 2005, 05:47 PM
  3. Slippery slope help needed.
    By Sturdee in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWERED
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 23rd September 2004, 12:54 PM
  4. Slippery floor
    By Tim the Timber Turner in forum WOODTURNING - GENERAL
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 18th May 2002, 02:49 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •