Thread: Are councils necessary?

One reason I built something off the house and neglected to involve the local council - too much red tape and too much trying to jump into my back pocket for everything. So I and everyone else I'm sure can fully understand your agro.

That said it's all to spec.

At least they dont sound like they're being obstructionist. We've had some developers take them to court here after they have been given a development approval with crazy conditions.
Did you hire a good engineer?

Because of all the development happening in suburbs (2 units on one block) the stormwater pipes in the street can't cope withe the sudden rush of water so the council have asked for a retention/detention tank where the first rush of stormwater goes into the tank and then slowly bleeds thru a small overflow pipe into the street.

All this is fair enough and I have no problem with it but when I asked the council for the size of the tank I was told they couldn't tell me.

Why not?

Because it has to be calculated using a formula.

So what is the formula?

We can't tell you. You have to pay an engineer to work it out for you then submit it and pay a approval fee

And they wonder why people get frustrated.

Originally Posted by artme

I never cease to be amazed by the incompetence of our local elected bodies and their all too apparent greed.

Third problem: New driveway for the block to be located where it would have a power pole smack in the middle of it!! Again the submitted map and info had been completely neglected.

We just did an extension/renovation were our existing double garage was converted into a study and a toy/tv room for the kids, and a new much bigger double garage with small workshop was built beside it. Council gave us approval for the building but would not move on the wider than normal but necessary driveway. As we had to remove our garden and they wanted all details on the plants types/numbers/sizes/ages/etc. The git behind the desk couldn't understand that it is my garden and I'll do as I please, and that if I had of decided to do a makeover and say change to natives or cacti that I would have just done it and not talked to the council "Oh but that is different", he says. "How?" , I say. And so on. They just couldn't see the logic of you have given me approval to build this extension, but I can't use it!!

With much frustration and anger they finally gave in, only took about two weeks, but the catcher/kicker was that we had to completely remove the existing perfectly good driveway, and fix the curb and channel, before we could start on the new one. Another $2500 that we hadn't budgetted for!!

They invented the words obstructionist and obfuscation,down where I spend summers three of the four councils have been sacked,and the fourth one is under investigation

Originally Posted by rat52

So what is the formula?

We can't tell you. You have to pay an engineer to work it out for you then submit it and pay a approval fee.

Stormwater routing isn't a simple formula calculation. It's an iterative thing best left to the very expensive software that has been developed to do it.

Yes rat52, there is a smidgen of sense in that but my position is totally different.

The engineer could not, or would not, see that I would be required to run water uphill. When I asked him if I was expected to put in a sump and pump he still couldn't see my point.

The other disturbing thing to come from this is the position elected councillors have in relation to salaried administrators, engineers and the like.
My understanding is that elected people are there to represent their constituents and look after their interests. It appears from what some developers and planners have told me that the engineers and administraors are virtually a law unto themselves. Any inquiries, or pushing the point by developers, surveyors and can cause the powers that be to become obstructive. Not only is this a problem but I was told councillors are reluctant to help constituents because they are wary of the CMC.

What has the country come to!!

The engineer could not, or would not, see that I would be required to run water uphill. When I asked him if I was expected to put in a sump and pump he still couldn't see my point.

That's not unheard of. A friend of mine was adding an extension to his house on a sloping block and was told that the storm water would have to be pumped up to street level. I think he got around it in the end by building a rubble pit which discharges onto the reserve below him.

From my limited dealings with council, elected councillors rarely get involved in these types of planning issues. They might if a development has been rejected but they have no power to have a decision changed. That's what the Land & Environment court is for. All planning and approval is done by the salaried staff - we don't get to elect them.

Also you will find it more and more difficult to find anyone in council who knows anything about the relevant building codes etc. It is not seen as their job to tell people how to build. Their focus is on local area planning and making sure that the relevant environmental, bushfire and other regulations are observed.

I have a small "cattle" farm at the foot of The Barringtons,accessed by a gazetted council road, dirt of course, that hasn't been maintained for over 16 years.
We CANNOT get a truck along the last 2km, so have a beautiful block that is completely unproductive, but I, and two neighbours, am expected to dutifully cough up our rates on time every time!!
When I complained to the council, I was informed "that not enough people lived along the road to make maintenance worthwhile.
When I offered to with hold the rates I was threatened with court action and, in time, forfeiture of the land!!
Guy Fawkes had the right idea!!!

Originally Posted by artme

The engineer could not, or would not, see that I would be required to run water uphill. When I asked him if I was expected to put in a sump and pump he still couldn't see my point.

That must have been a planner, doesn't sound like an engineer.

The business I'm in has just moved our warehouse into a brand new building which our landlords have built on there property. When they were building the council told them they had to put garden beds in to seperate the car parks and driveway to which they complied. Two weeks after the building was completed and landscaping finished they were told the council rules have changed and they had to be taken out and concreted in (to allow semi trailer access) at a cost of $30 000.

If they had a development permit, that should be that, councils can't come back and have a second go at things if they change their minds. (Not saying they dont, just they shouldn't)

Originally Posted by enigma

The business I'm in has just moved our warehouse into a brand new building which our landlords have built on there property. When they were building the council told them they had to put garden beds in to seperate the car parks and driveway to which they complied. Two weeks after the building was completed and landscaping finished they were told the council rules have changed and they had to be taken out and concreted in (to allow semi trailer access) at a cost of $30 000.

that's a try-on
the requirements as of the date of the original DA are the ones that apply
any subsequent modifications (submitted by the developer/owner) only apply to the items modified

Originally Posted by Lignin

I have a small "cattle" farm at the foot of The Barringtons,accessed by a gazetted council road, dirt of course, that hasn't been maintained for over 16 years.
We CANNOT get a truck along the last 2km, so have a beautiful block that is completely unproductive, but I, and two neighbours, am expected to dutifully cough up our rates on time every time!!
When I complained to the council, I was informed "that not enough people lived along the road to make maintenance worthwhile.
When I offered to with hold the rates I was threatened with court action and, in time, forfeiture of the land!!
Guy Fawkes had the right idea!!!

you might like to mention the words
malfeasance
misfeasance
to council
about 7 years ago the High Court held that Councils could not do nothing in that sort of situation, either council has to formally close the raod and then pay compensation for you becoming "land locked" or you can recover your costs of using the road from Council

Council should readily see that sending a grader and/or small dozer along the road will be cheaper than hiring a chopper to get you in and out