Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 20 of 20
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Sunbury, Vic
    Age
    84
    Posts
    2,718

    Default

    Many years ago, my in-laws received the former number of one of the local working girls. Needless to say it was promptly changed after a complaint.
    Tom

    "It's good enough" is low aim

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Age
    2010
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 1999
    Location
    Westleigh, Sydney
    Age
    77
    Posts
    9,549

    Default

    Back when mobile phones were new, we (work) hired a brick to check on reception around the riverina. We were out in the middle of the Hay Plain, when it rang. "Is that the Wagga stripper?" I explained that it wasn't, and when I took the phone back, told the place we'd hired it from. He said that it had previously been hired to a working girl, and when she first returned it they were getting about 20 calls a day!
    Visit my website
    Website
    Facebook

  4. #18
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Sunshine Coast Queensland
    Age
    53
    Posts
    1,401

    Default

    I can remember the early days of mobile phones - being able to listen to them on a scanner.

  5. #19
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Queensland
    Posts
    2,947

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by smidsy View Post
    I can remember the early days of mobile phones - being able to listen to them on a scanner.
    Isn't that how Charlie Windsor was caught out?
    Regards,
    Bob

    Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

  6. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    27,791

    Default

    My son has been working for an IT security company as a "Penetration tester".
    This is a "legitimate hacker", hired by Government, Corporates and Businesses to test their IT security,
    Much of the testing involves phishing rather than sitting in a dark room trying to hack direct into a network.
    He also dresses up and poses and company IT guy and enters their buildings and plugs gizmos direct into their network (lone PC or network point) that directly connects to the outside world via independent WIFI or telephony.
    On one corporate test he was able to enter and place a gizmo onto their network and then sat in a car on the street and was able to hack and download most of their most sensitive data files within 30 minutes.
    He attributes his skill in doing this successfully to the acting experience he gained in school productions.

    In a recent test of a major Resources company he sent out 2 emails to the employees and senior managers of the company.
    This company has been tested every year for the last 3 years and have been upgrading and educating their employees on IT security.
    This time the boss of the Resources company reckoned their IT system would not be compromised.
    My son's boss told them "we have a gun new pen tester and I reckon we will have full access within X time period"

    Email A was, posing as company IT employee with company letter head, signature, and logos etc, "Here's a link to a new piece of software we would like you to try" - Within 24 hours he had the login details of ~20 general staff.
    Email B was, now posing as an overseas company rep, "Here's a link to a document that could potentially compromise company PR, please read and comment" - Within 24 hours he had the login details of ~20 senior staff.
    A few dozen staff did report email A as suspicious but the company's IT staff took more than 24 hours to investigate and put out an alert and by then it was too late.
    Give that there are thousands of staff and only ~100 senior staff the latter are clear less IT security savvy than their general staff.'
    From these accounts plus some direct hacking my son was able to get access to most of the companies IT resources and information well within X time period.
    Only 30% of the employee had passwords that were strong enough not to be cracked in the time period allowed.

    The results of some of the testing my son has done on Govt departments involved with vital infrastructure would make your hair curl.
    He reckons the only organisations that are taking this matter seriously are financial institutions and the military but everyone else systems are so full of holes that it is embarrassingly easy to access.
    BTW he has also tested several forum software apps and says they are one of the weakest apps out there and the reason they are are not targeted that often is because they contain little of real value.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Telemarketers and Scammers
    By rrich in forum NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH WOODWORK
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 23rd August 2016, 01:19 PM
  2. Are the scammers getting smarter?
    By underfoot in forum NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH WOODWORK
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 2nd April 2011, 10:10 PM
  3. Man smart - Woman smarter
    By BazzaDLB in forum WOODIES JOKES
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 8th November 2007, 08:15 PM
  4. Scammers web sites
    By normell in forum Links to: WEB SITES
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 25th December 2005, 07:12 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •