Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Needs Pictures Needs Pictures:  0
Picture(s) thanks Picture(s) thanks:  0
Page 5 of 8 FirstFirst 12345678 LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 108
  1. #61
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    2,340

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Woodlee View Post
    The compasses in our jet fighters are in degrees , maps are printed to the degree , and ships compasses are in degrees .
    One thing I've noticed is that wind speed is now given in K/ph ,when it used to be knots, is that the standard or is it just because the media and the metrology people think it's easier for the public to understand.
    Ship and aircraft speed are still given in knots.

    Bloody wierd



    Kev.
    Kev, without going in to too much detail, the mish-mash of units is partially used because it makes navigation easier, partially because it was simply decided to keep this as the standard in most of the world. However if you go to China and the old USSR they are fully metric so you fly at xxxx metres instead of feet, wind speed is metres/sec (the true SI speed unit) instead of kts, and so it goes on. kph is a dumbed down derivative of the core SI value. Large aircraft have the ability to switch between the 2 standards on their altimeters and this is cross checked against written tables as the autopilot systems work in feet only. It's a PIA actually but at least the procedures are there to cover this and everyone in the one area is on the same system.

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #62
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    5,271

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pete F View Post
    I'm doing my bit buy buying metric however
    If it helps ease your pain, I only specify metric fasteners except where there's a specific non-metric linear adjustment required, or where I have to incorporate a non-metric threaded component. Fight the good fight!
    .
    I know you believe you understand what you think I wrote, but I'm not sure you realize that what you just read is not what I meant.


    Regards, Woodwould.

  4. #63
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    184

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pete F View Post
    Anyway, I was hoping somebody could explain why whitworth is still used so extensively for household fasteners here as it seems simply bizarre to me, but sometimes there's a good reason for what appears odd at face value.
    What seems really crazy about this to me is that if you buy a bolt it's probably BSW and then you buy a spanner and it's A/F which won't fit the stupid bolt. E.g. go to Bunnings and they don't sell bolts that match the imperial spaners they sell. If you look up Whitworth on wikipedia it even cites Australia as a place that still uses it extensively.

  5. #64
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Dundowran Beach
    Age
    76
    Posts
    19,922

    Question

    Quote Originally Posted by blackfrancis View Post
    What seems really crazy about this to me is that if you buy a bolt it's probably BSW and then you buy a spanner and it's A/F which won't fit the stupid bolt. E.g. go to Bunnings and they don't sell bolts that match the imperial spaners they sell. If you look up Whitworth on wikipedia it even cites Australia as a place that still uses it extensively.
    That´s a whole new can of worms. Can Wikipedia be truly trusted?

  6. #65
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Charlestown NSW
    Age
    65
    Posts
    899

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pete F View Post
    Anyway, I was hoping somebody could explain why whitworth is still used so extensively for household fasteners here as it seems simply bizarre to me, but sometimes there's a good reason for what appears odd at face value.
    Maybe its just a case of the tooling for making it hasn't worn out yet. Though I think that probably wouldn't be true after all this time. Speaking of odd ball threads. some time ago I bought a small compressor and a nail gun from Bunnings. Also bought a pack of quick release air couplings. This was a sealed blister pack. Anyway I didn't get around to opening the fittings for a fair while as I decided to use the stuff I already had. When I finally opened the pack I discovered that all the female couplers had BSP threads and all the males had NPT.

    bollie7

  7. #66
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Mackay Qld
    Posts
    3,466

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by blackfrancis View Post
    What seems really crazy about this to me is that if you buy a bolt it's probably BSW and then you buy a spanner and it's A/F which won't fit the stupid bolt. E.g. go to Bunnings and they don't sell bolts that match the imperial spaners they sell. If you look up Whitworth on wikipedia it even cites Australia as a place that still uses it extensively.
    Gents,
    I believe that you may misunderstand the plethora of Imperial measurements found among hardware stock thread offerings is really UNC and UNF, not Whitworth as the Chinese make these for the yanks by the shipload and they are cheap and easy to offload out here in Oz to the hardware chain mobs.

    Industrially speaking 98% of the blueprints and drawings I have been involved with in the last 30 years involve Metric threads.

    Imperial, in my experience has only been used if the original equipment or machinery involved has been upgraded and requires Imperial threads for the replaced or repaired equipment to match up.

    Sure, there were in the past a bit of Sae and Whitworth thread sizes as a legacy from the POM motor vehicles.That may be the origin of the wiki reference.

    I still recall seeing this crap in the early Nissan engines as they were exact copies right down to thread specs, thankfully those days have gone.Once you got back to the clutch the bastrds went back to metric.Having to purchase another set of spanners to complete the mechanical work was not amusing.

    As for Wikipedia I would take their pronouncements with a grain of salt as it is often unreferenced. You and I are able to write a article and place it there. It won’t necessarily mean it is correct ,its just some ones opinion, as this is.

    cheers

    Grahame

  8. #67
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    2,340

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grahame Collins View Post
    Gents,
    I believe that you may misunderstand the plethora of Imperial measurements found among hardware stock thread offerings is really UNC and UNF, not Whitworth as the Chinese make these for the yanks by the shipload and they are cheap and easy to offload out here in Oz to the hardware chain mobs.
    Grahame I may have misunderstood what you were saying here. According to Zenith's own catalogue (and they seem to be the major supplier to the stores I know) most of their fasteners are "whitworth thread" Zenith Home For all their reference to whitworth they sure as heck don't look like rounded threads to me and I can't find my thread thingie (what the heck is that called anyway, brain fart) to measure the angle.

    I'm definitely no expert on this, so could be waaaay off the mark here, but my understanding is that while the thread form is different, the pitch is identical in MOST cases for the same diameter bolt (except 1/2"????) and so they can be interchanged. However the loading on the thread is all screwed up so while it may fit it may fail in service under load.

    Unfortunately this whole area is a complete shambles from what I can tell. Amongst relatively common nut/bolts there are only 3 systems that I can think of whitworth, metric, and UN. Obviously their derivatives (and clearly other specialist systems), yet I've seen "AF tap sets" advertised. As far as I'm aware "AF" means "across flat" and is a measure of bolt head size, there is no "AF" thread standard and this is actually referring to UNF?

  9. #68
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    184

    Default

    Yes AF means across flat. If you measure the heads on a whitworth bolt they are a different size to the corresponding UNC bolt. You need a whitworth spanner for them, not an AF one, so it's extremely easy to identify a hex-head whitworth bolt from a UNC one. The bolts they usually sell at hardware shops, in my experience, are whitworth not UNC. Even speacilist bolt shops often stock certain whitworth bolts that they don't have in UNC. I've yet to be told we don't have this in whitworth but we have it in UNC, the other way round I've heard alot.

  10. #69
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    near Rockhampton
    Posts
    4,304

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by blackfrancis View Post
    If you measure the heads on a whitworth bolt they are a different size to the corresponding UNC bolt. You need a whitworth spanner for them,
    nah, you just use a shifter

  11. #70
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    184

    Default

    Yer, they sell them at Bunnings

  12. #71
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    sydney
    Age
    64
    Posts
    3,566

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pete F View Post
    Grahame I may have misunderstood what you were saying here. According to Zenith's own catalogue (and they seem to be the major supplier to the stores I know) most of their fasteners are "whitworth thread" Zenith Home For all their reference to whitworth they sure as heck don't look like rounded threads to me and I can't find my thread thingie (what the heck is that called anyway, brain fart) to measure the angle.

    I'm definitely no expert on this, so could be waaaay off the mark here, but my understanding is that while the thread form is different, the pitch is identical in MOST cases for the same diameter bolt (except 1/2"????) and so they can be interchanged. However the loading on the thread is all screwed up so while it may fit it may fail in service under load.

    Unfortunately this whole area is a complete shambles from what I can tell. Amongst relatively common nut/bolts there are only 3 systems that I can think of whitworth, metric, and UN. Obviously their derivatives (and clearly other specialist systems), yet I've seen "AF tap sets" advertised. As far as I'm aware "AF" means "across flat" and is a measure of bolt head size, there is no "AF" thread standard and this is actually referring to UNF?
    What does that 2nd paragraph mean,what threads are you reffering to.

  13. #72
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    2,340

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pipeclay View Post
    What does that 2nd paragraph mean,what threads are you reffering to.
    Sorry I wasn't very clear was I, the tpi is the same between UNC and BSW (and yeah I checked it is 1/2" that's different, no 13 tpi in BSW, guess he was superstitious). However the thread loading is such that if interchanged the thread may fail under load and shouldn't be used. So I guess the warning they're trying to convey is if a hole is tapped for BSW in the lovely Morgan suspension you've been slaving over don't go and jam a UNC bolt in there, even though it may well fit, or the first corner you try in it could be the last
    That's my understanding anyway.

    Edit: Ok I just tried it for myself. Firstly the Zenith bolts I have here are definitely whitworth, no doubt about it. Yes a UNC nut will fit on a whitworth bolt, but there's no doubt there's something terribly wrong as it feels sloppy. I couldn't get the whitworth nuts on to the UNC bolts however. Finally, I FINALLY figured out was going on with the spanner sizes, the UNC are standard AF spanners, metric are metric spanners, so far so good. The whitworths take metric spanners (though not sure if all sizes) so that would certainly explain why I was scratching my head a few times as to what nut/bolt I was dealing with as it clearly wasn't either metric or UNC. The penny drops ... Pffft, clear as mud to me now!

  14. #73
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    sydney
    Age
    64
    Posts
    3,566

    Default

    The TPI is the same between BSW and UNC except as you mentioned 1/2" but in engineering terms I wouldnt use an UNC nut on a BSW thread unless it was the last thing you could do to get you out of trouble,the TPI might almost be the same in all cases but the Thread Angle is different.
    Same as you wouldnt for good results use a BSP fitting in NPT unless it was last resort.

  15. #74
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Charlestown NSW
    Age
    65
    Posts
    899

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pete F View Post
    Finally, I FINALLY figured out was going on with the spanner sizes, the UNC are standard AF spanners, metric are metric spanners, so far so good. The whitworths take metric spanners (though not sure if all sizes) so that would certainly explain why I was scratching my head a few times as to what nut/bolt I was dealing with as it clearly wasn't either metric or UNC. The penny drops ... Pffft, clear as mud to me now!
    Don't get too comfortable there. There is even variation in Whitworth. Not in the actual threads but in the way the head size is measured. There is Whitworth and British Standard Whitworth. I can't remember how it goes now (its 20 years since I worked on anything with whitworth) but for example a spanner marked 1/2" Whit is not the same size as one marked 1/2"BSW.

    bollie7

  16. #75
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    2,340

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bollie7 View Post
    Don't get too comfortable there. There is even variation in Whitworth. Not in the actual threads but in the way the head size is measured. There is Whitworth and British Standard Whitworth. I can't remember how it goes now (its 20 years since I worked on anything with whitworth) but for example a spanner marked 1/2" Whit is not the same size as one marked 1/2"BSW.

    bollie7
    Ha Ha, oh gawd! It really is out of control isn't it.

Page 5 of 8 FirstFirst 12345678 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Where to find an 11mm brad point bit in Melb?
    By Waldo in forum WOODWORK - GENERAL
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 15th April 2009, 03:52 PM
  2. another thing
    By kruger in forum WOODTURNING - PEN TURNING
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 27th December 2008, 09:47 AM
  3. Did I do the right thing
    By Phil Spencer in forum NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH WOODWORK
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 5th March 2008, 05:11 PM
  4. now for a different thing
    By fxst in forum WOODWORK PICS
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 9th March 2006, 10:06 PM
  5. have I done a bad thing?
    By Ivor in forum BANDSAWS
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 22nd December 2005, 08:37 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •