Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Needs Pictures: 0
Picture(s) thanks: 0
Results 61 to 75 of 108
Thread: 11mm nut no such thing
-
7th November 2009, 08:44 AM #61SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- Sydney
- Posts
- 2,340
Kev, without going in to too much detail, the mish-mash of units is partially used because it makes navigation easier, partially because it was simply decided to keep this as the standard in most of the world. However if you go to China and the old USSR they are fully metric so you fly at xxxx metres instead of feet, wind speed is metres/sec (the true SI speed unit) instead of kts, and so it goes on. kph is a dumbed down derivative of the core SI value. Large aircraft have the ability to switch between the 2 standards on their altimeters and this is cross checked against written tables as the autopilot systems work in feet only. It's a PIA actually but at least the procedures are there to cover this and everyone in the one area is on the same system.
-
7th November 2009 08:44 AM # ADSGoogle Adsense Advertisement
- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Posts
- Many
-
7th November 2009, 08:45 AM #62.
I know you believe you understand what you think I wrote, but I'm not sure you realize that what you just read is not what I meant.
Regards, Woodwould.
-
7th November 2009, 09:37 AM #63Senior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- Canberra
- Posts
- 184
What seems really crazy about this to me is that if you buy a bolt it's probably BSW and then you buy a spanner and it's A/F which won't fit the stupid bolt. E.g. go to Bunnings and they don't sell bolts that match the imperial spaners they sell. If you look up Whitworth on wikipedia it even cites Australia as a place that still uses it extensively.
-
7th November 2009, 10:36 AM #64Skwair2rownd
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Location
- Dundowran Beach
- Age
- 76
- Posts
- 19,922
-
7th November 2009, 11:14 AM #65SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
- Location
- Charlestown NSW
- Age
- 65
- Posts
- 899
Maybe its just a case of the tooling for making it hasn't worn out yet. Though I think that probably wouldn't be true after all this time. Speaking of odd ball threads. some time ago I bought a small compressor and a nail gun from Bunnings. Also bought a pack of quick release air couplings. This was a sealed blister pack. Anyway I didn't get around to opening the fittings for a fair while as I decided to use the stuff I already had. When I finally opened the pack I discovered that all the female couplers had BSP threads and all the males had NPT.
bollie7
-
7th November 2009, 01:38 PM #66
Gents,
I believe that you may misunderstand the plethora of Imperial measurements found among hardware stock thread offerings is really UNC and UNF, not Whitworth as the Chinese make these for the yanks by the shipload and they are cheap and easy to offload out here in Oz to the hardware chain mobs.
Industrially speaking 98% of the blueprints and drawings I have been involved with in the last 30 years involve Metric threads.
Imperial, in my experience has only been used if the original equipment or machinery involved has been upgraded and requires Imperial threads for the replaced or repaired equipment to match up.
Sure, there were in the past a bit of Sae and Whitworth thread sizes as a legacy from the POM motor vehicles.That may be the origin of the wiki reference.
I still recall seeing this crap in the early Nissan engines as they were exact copies right down to thread specs, thankfully those days have gone.Once you got back to the clutch the bastrds went back to metric.Having to purchase another set of spanners to complete the mechanical work was not amusing.
As for Wikipedia I would take their pronouncements with a grain of salt as it is often unreferenced. You and I are able to write a article and place it there. It won’t necessarily mean it is correct ,its just some ones opinion, as this is.
cheers
Grahame
-
7th November 2009, 02:14 PM #67SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- Sydney
- Posts
- 2,340
Grahame I may have misunderstood what you were saying here. According to Zenith's own catalogue (and they seem to be the major supplier to the stores I know) most of their fasteners are "whitworth thread" Zenith Home For all their reference to whitworth they sure as heck don't look like rounded threads to me and I can't find my thread thingie (what the heck is that called anyway, brain fart) to measure the angle.
I'm definitely no expert on this, so could be waaaay off the mark here, but my understanding is that while the thread form is different, the pitch is identical in MOST cases for the same diameter bolt (except 1/2"????) and so they can be interchanged. However the loading on the thread is all screwed up so while it may fit it may fail in service under load.
Unfortunately this whole area is a complete shambles from what I can tell. Amongst relatively common nut/bolts there are only 3 systems that I can think of whitworth, metric, and UN. Obviously their derivatives (and clearly other specialist systems), yet I've seen "AF tap sets" advertised. As far as I'm aware "AF" means "across flat" and is a measure of bolt head size, there is no "AF" thread standard and this is actually referring to UNF?
-
7th November 2009, 04:29 PM #68Senior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- Canberra
- Posts
- 184
Yes AF means across flat. If you measure the heads on a whitworth bolt they are a different size to the corresponding UNC bolt. You need a whitworth spanner for them, not an AF one, so it's extremely easy to identify a hex-head whitworth bolt from a UNC one. The bolts they usually sell at hardware shops, in my experience, are whitworth not UNC. Even speacilist bolt shops often stock certain whitworth bolts that they don't have in UNC. I've yet to be told we don't have this in whitworth but we have it in UNC, the other way round I've heard alot.
-
7th November 2009, 04:45 PM #69Pink 10EE owner
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
- Location
- near Rockhampton
- Posts
- 4,304
-
7th November 2009, 04:48 PM #70Senior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- Canberra
- Posts
- 184
Yer, they sell them at Bunnings
-
7th November 2009, 05:17 PM #71GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- sydney
- Age
- 64
- Posts
- 3,566
-
7th November 2009, 06:00 PM #72SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- Sydney
- Posts
- 2,340
Sorry I wasn't very clear was I, the tpi is the same between UNC and BSW (and yeah I checked it is 1/2" that's different, no 13 tpi in BSW, guess he was superstitious). However the thread loading is such that if interchanged the thread may fail under load and shouldn't be used. So I guess the warning they're trying to convey is if a hole is tapped for BSW in the lovely Morgan suspension you've been slaving over don't go and jam a UNC bolt in there, even though it may well fit, or the first corner you try in it could be the last
That's my understanding anyway.
Edit: Ok I just tried it for myself. Firstly the Zenith bolts I have here are definitely whitworth, no doubt about it. Yes a UNC nut will fit on a whitworth bolt, but there's no doubt there's something terribly wrong as it feels sloppy. I couldn't get the whitworth nuts on to the UNC bolts however. Finally, I FINALLY figured out was going on with the spanner sizes, the UNC are standard AF spanners, metric are metric spanners, so far so good. The whitworths take metric spanners (though not sure if all sizes) so that would certainly explain why I was scratching my head a few times as to what nut/bolt I was dealing with as it clearly wasn't either metric or UNC. The penny drops ... Pffft, clear as mud to me now!
-
7th November 2009, 07:51 PM #73GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- sydney
- Age
- 64
- Posts
- 3,566
The TPI is the same between BSW and UNC except as you mentioned 1/2" but in engineering terms I wouldnt use an UNC nut on a BSW thread unless it was the last thing you could do to get you out of trouble,the TPI might almost be the same in all cases but the Thread Angle is different.
Same as you wouldnt for good results use a BSP fitting in NPT unless it was last resort.
-
7th November 2009, 09:50 PM #74SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
- Location
- Charlestown NSW
- Age
- 65
- Posts
- 899
Don't get too comfortable there. There is even variation in Whitworth. Not in the actual threads but in the way the head size is measured. There is Whitworth and British Standard Whitworth. I can't remember how it goes now (its 20 years since I worked on anything with whitworth) but for example a spanner marked 1/2" Whit is not the same size as one marked 1/2"BSW.
bollie7
-
7th November 2009, 09:56 PM #75SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- Sydney
- Posts
- 2,340
Similar Threads
-
Where to find an 11mm brad point bit in Melb?
By Waldo in forum WOODWORK - GENERALReplies: 10Last Post: 15th April 2009, 03:52 PM -
another thing
By kruger in forum WOODTURNING - PEN TURNINGReplies: 7Last Post: 27th December 2008, 09:47 AM -
Did I do the right thing
By Phil Spencer in forum NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH WOODWORKReplies: 10Last Post: 5th March 2008, 05:11 PM -
now for a different thing
By fxst in forum WOODWORK PICSReplies: 5Last Post: 9th March 2006, 10:06 PM -
have I done a bad thing?
By Ivor in forum BANDSAWSReplies: 8Last Post: 22nd December 2005, 08:37 PM