Thanks Thanks:  0
Needs Pictures Needs Pictures:  0
Picture(s) thanks Picture(s) thanks:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 19

Thread: lathe levelling

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    near Warragul, Victoria
    Posts
    2,500

    Default lathe levelling

    I am about to open a can of worm with this topic

    I have been turning between centres ( using the 3 jaw chuck and turned centre method ) , I am trying to achieve a decent straight cut over approx. 8" lenght . I firstly levelled the Sheraton bed with my U beaut brand new German machinists level , by adjusting the feet on the floor . Then, by taking trial cuts and moving the tailstock over a tiny tad, I tried my best , but this method has proved to be too much trial and error ! By the way this lathe is worn , it isn't new by any standards . Anyway tapping the tailstock over isn't precise enough - because its too easy to tap it too far or too little and for some reason I dont get decent repeatability with this method - the trial cuts are all over the place . So, I resorted to adjusting the 4 adjusting screws under each corner of the bed mounts - these are bed height adjusting screws within a lock down bolt . By moving two screws , diagonally opposed , I seem to have achieved a good result . The bed is still flat and the trial cuts are .0005" over the 8" .

    So by twisting each corner of the bed , it seems to have done the trick ? Mike

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    7,775

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by morrisman View Post
    I am about to open a can of worm with this topic
    You know this isnt RDM right?

    Quote Originally Posted by morrisman View Post
    Anyway tapping the tailstock over isn't precise enough
    What is this "tapping" of which you speak? Don't you have a dial gauge or DTI?
    Isnt there two bolts you can work against each other to move the tailstock accurately?


    Quote Originally Posted by morrisman View Post
    So by twisting each corner of the bed , it seems to have done the trick ?
    Bed wear shouldn't be an issue.Turning between centers shouldn't need bed twisting, you should be able to do that with the tailstock.
    You've now aligned the bed to the tailstock... not the other way around.



    But.... if it got the job done.......

    Stuart

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    near Warragul, Victoria
    Posts
    2,500

    Default tailstock

    Quote Originally Posted by Stustoys View Post
    You know this isnt RDM right?


    What is this "tapping" of which you speak? Don't you have a dial gauge or DTI?
    Isnt there two bolts you can work against each other to move the tailstock accurately?



    Bed wear shouldn't be an issue.Turning between centers shouldn't need bed twisting, you should be able to do that with the tailstock.
    You've now aligned the bed to the tailstock... not the other way around.



    But.... if it got the job done.......

    Stuart
    Hi Stuart

    Yes the tailstock has 2 tiny screws each side , but these don't have enough force to move the tailstock across , it's far too tight . All they seem to do is lock the tailstock in position.

    It's weird , but for some reason - when the 4 bed adjusting screws are all taken out of the equation - with no twisting - I cannot get any repeatability with my trial cuts , its only when the 2 diag. opposed bed screws are tensioned up, that all seems fine and the repeatability is good . Mike

  5. #4
    Ueee's Avatar
    Ueee is offline Blacksmith, Cabinetmaker, Machinist, Messmaker
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Canberra
    Age
    40
    Posts
    4,467

    Default

    Hi Mike,
    You may find now that if you try to turn a different length between centers it may not cut straight. Stu is right, use the 2 bolts to "torque" the t/s into alignment. With a dial on the t/s it is fairly easy to move the t/s half the dia difference the lathe has cut.

    Ew
    1915 17"x50" LeBlond heavy duty Lathe, 24" Queen city shaper, 1970's G Vernier FV.3.TO Universal Mill, 1958 Blohm HFS 6 surface grinder, 1942 Rivett 715 Lathe, 14"x40" Antrac Lathe, Startrite H225 Bandsaw, 1949 Hercus Camelback Drill press, 1947 Holbrook C10 Lathe.

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    near Warragul, Victoria
    Posts
    2,500

    Default results

    Quote Originally Posted by Ueee View Post
    Hi Mike,
    You may find now that if you try to turn a different length between centers it may not cut straight. Stu is right, use the 2 bolts to "torque" the t/s into alignment. With a dial on the t/s it is fairly easy to move the t/s half the dia difference the lathe has cut.

    Ew
    hi Ewan

    Yes , I see your point . But I did test a different length of bar with trial cuts and it still works OK . Mike

  7. #6
    Ueee's Avatar
    Ueee is offline Blacksmith, Cabinetmaker, Machinist, Messmaker
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Canberra
    Age
    40
    Posts
    4,467

    Default

    WRT the t/s not moving with the screws, i find you need to loosen the bed lock off a little and it will move more easily. A dial monitoring the movement means it is hard to go too far. You also need to be sure of how the screws work. On the antrac the screws are threaded into the top half of the T/S (they are really long grub screws) and just push on a block on the bottom half. The other lathes all have the screws threaded into the bottom half of the T/S. When i first went to adjust the Antrac i had no idea what was going on, i actually had to pull the T/S apart to see just how it went together.

    One other thing though, with the lathes you own, why are you trying to do such precise work on the lightest and least rigid?

    Ew
    1915 17"x50" LeBlond heavy duty Lathe, 24" Queen city shaper, 1970's G Vernier FV.3.TO Universal Mill, 1958 Blohm HFS 6 surface grinder, 1942 Rivett 715 Lathe, 14"x40" Antrac Lathe, Startrite H225 Bandsaw, 1949 Hercus Camelback Drill press, 1947 Holbrook C10 Lathe.

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    7,775

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ueee View Post
    WRT the t/s not moving with the screws, i find you need to loosen the bed lock off a little and it will move more easily. A dial monitoring the movement means it is hard to go too far. You also need to be sure of how the screws work. On the antrac the screws are threaded into the top half of the T/S (they are really long grub screws) and just push on a block on the bottom half. The other lathes all have the screws threaded into the bottom half of the T/S. When i first went to adjust the Antrac i had no idea what was going on, i actually had to pull the T/S apart to see just how it went together.
    Well I'll just delete my post then lol I wrote pretty much the same thing including the head scratching when you come across your first tailstocks that moves "the wrong way"

    Stuart

  9. #8
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Lower Lakes SA
    Age
    58
    Posts
    2,557

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by morrisman View Post
    It's weird , but for some reason - when the 4 bed adjusting screws are all taken out of the equation - with no twisting - I cannot get any repeatability with my trial cuts , its only when the 2 diag. opposed bed screws are tensioned up, that all seems fine and the repeatability is good . Mike
    Could be the saddle is worn to match the bed in it's relaxed (twisted) state, and when you untwist it you're getting poor contact and instability.

  10. #9
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Lower Lakes SA
    Age
    58
    Posts
    2,557

    Default

    Or it could be the opposite. If you are right about the bed being straight when relaxed, maybe the saddle is rocking and when you put a twist in, it stabilises.

    It's hard to understand from what you've written.

  11. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    near Warragul, Victoria
    Posts
    2,500

    Default LATHES

    Quote Originally Posted by Ueee View Post
    One other thing though, with the lathes you own, why are you trying to do such precise work on the lightest and least rigid?

    Ew
    Yes , its just my backwards methods, doing it the hard way I am trying to tweak the Sheraton to a good accurate standard , by doing this I hopefully will learn about the ins and outs of lathes . Sometimes an anomaly comes along that doesnt add up . Its all part of the mysteries of machining . Mike

  12. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    near Warragul, Victoria
    Posts
    2,500

    Default Writing

    Quote Originally Posted by Bryan View Post
    It's hard to understand from what you've written.
    Seems pretty clear to me ! Stuart and Ewan have understood the situation rather well

  13. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    near Warragul, Victoria
    Posts
    2,500

    Default u toob again

    This guy is using shims, but its basically what I am doing

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dvs5YiDl_90

  14. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    7,775

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by morrisman View Post
    This guy is using shims, but its basically what I am doing
    Ok now I'm confused as well......leveling a lathe shouldnt have anything to do with turning between centers.....


    Stuart

    p.s. Its said you shouldn't put the level on top the the ways like that...... that surface isn't necessarily ground parallel.

  15. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    near Warragul, Victoria
    Posts
    2,500

    Default

    [QUOTE=Stustoys;1774337].....leveling a lathe shouldnt have anything to do with turning between centers.....


    Ok , I must have lathe theory the wrong way around. From what you guys are writing, It seems that the only reason for turning a taper between centres is because the tailstock is out of alignment In other words there are no other reasons at all

    It could be, the bed is worn towards the headstock, causing the tool traverse to lower . Mike

  16. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    2,951

    Default

    [QUOTE=morrisman;1774386]
    Quote Originally Posted by Stustoys View Post
    .....leveling a lathe shouldnt have anything to do with turning between centers.....


    Ok , I must have lathe theory the wrong way around. From what you guys are writing, It seems that the only reason for turning a taper between centres is because the tailstock is out of alignment In other words there are no other reasons at all

    It could be, the bed is worn towards the headstock, causing the tool traverse to lower . Mike
    I would think that there would have to be an awful lot of bed wear for it to cause you to turn a taper purely from tool height variation.

    Simon
    Girl, I don't wanna know about your mild-mannered alter ego or anything like that." I mean, you tell me you're, uh, super-mega-ultra-lightning babe? That's all right with me. I'm good. I'm good.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Lathe Levelling - A Different Tack
    By Anorak Bob in forum METALWORK FORUM
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 22nd July 2012, 12:04 PM
  2. Lathe Levelling
    By Anorak Bob in forum METALWORK FORUM
    Replies: 112
    Last Post: 12th July 2012, 01:04 AM
  3. lathe levelling
    By YarrD in forum METALWORK FORUM
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 26th October 2011, 10:58 PM
  4. Levelling the lathe
    By jefferson in forum WOODTURNING - GENERAL
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 9th July 2008, 10:08 PM
  5. Raising / levelling lathe bed
    By djb955 in forum WOODTURNING - GENERAL
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 4th September 2003, 11:08 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •