Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Needs Pictures Needs Pictures:  0
Picture(s) thanks Picture(s) thanks:  0
Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Newcastle
    Posts
    287

    Default Machinery without DE

    Hi all
    Could be sacrileges around here.... I'm looking at picking up thicknesser/jointer and table saw very soon. I do intent to sort out DE for them soon too, but need the planers mainly to finish off a bed project. So my question is - will the machines work ok for quick stuff without DE, and just make a mess.... I do wear a canister filter dust mask....
    Jointer - 6", thicknesser 330mm, table saw TSC-10HB....
    I know I should spring for the DE up front, but it may need to wait a few weeks or so.
    Lee

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Northern Sydney
    Age
    49
    Posts
    2,764

    Default

    The jointer and table saw will be ok but will just make a big mess.

    I think the thicknesser will struggle more, but I've not had a lot of experience with that. Maybe using a shopvac to clear it out after each pass would be OK? Others may offer better advice here.

    Cheers,
    Dave
    ...but together with the coffee civility flowed back into him
    Patrick O'Brian, Treason's Harbour

  4. #3
    Join Date
    May 1999
    Location
    Grovedale, Victoria Australia
    Age
    66
    Posts
    3,896

    Default

    The saw you could get away with just messy

    The jointer and thicknesser definatly need a 2hp extractor.

    If you dont use a dust extractor the shavings get dragged back in with the blade and not only do they cut but they compress the shavings between the timber and blades and leave nice impressions on the freshly planed timber.
    Jim Carroll
    One Good Turn Deserves Another. CWS, Vicmarc, Robert Sorby, Woodcut, Tormek, Woodfast
    Are you a registered member? Why not? click here to register. It's free and only takes 37 seconds!

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Newcastle
    Posts
    287

    Default

    So I really do need to stump for the DE up front?

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Northern Sydney
    Age
    49
    Posts
    2,764

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Carroll View Post
    The saw you could get away with just messy

    The jointer and thicknesser definatly need a 2hp extractor.

    If you dont use a dust extractor the shavings get dragged back in with the blade and not only do they cut but they compress the shavings between the timber and blades and leave nice impressions on the freshly planed timber.
    Thanks Jim. I stand corrected.
    ...but together with the coffee civility flowed back into him
    Patrick O'Brian, Treason's Harbour

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Newcastle
    Posts
    287

    Default

    I thought I read on here somewhere you could get away with 1hp on jointer/thicknesser (1 machine a time)?? The overall plan was to get a 1hp for them, and a separate 2hp for TS....

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Port Pirie SA
    Age
    52
    Posts
    6,908

    Default

    For the price for the two dustys a single 3hp will give more suction with a few $$$ left to help pay for pipe work and connections(which often cost's more than the machine).
    ....................................................................

  9. #8
    Join Date
    May 1999
    Location
    Grovedale, Victoria Australia
    Age
    66
    Posts
    3,896

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Astrodog View Post
    I thought I read on here somewhere you could get away with 1hp on jointer/thicknesser (1 machine a time)?? The overall plan was to get a 1hp for them, and a separate 2hp for TS....
    You can get away with the 1hp on a lathe or saw bench just but the others need the 2hp.
    The 1hp are allright for getting the dust out of the way but heavy material can soon clog the pipes and reduce the draw on the extractor.

    If you compare the cfm between a 1 and 2hp it is almost double and try and stick to a tiawanese one as they are more efficient again.
    Jim Carroll
    One Good Turn Deserves Another. CWS, Vicmarc, Robert Sorby, Woodcut, Tormek, Woodfast
    Are you a registered member? Why not? click here to register. It's free and only takes 37 seconds!

  10. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    27,790

    Default

    Astrodog, I notice in your first post you are concerned about wood dust dust as a health issue more than a the fact that a mess might be created.

    If this is the case then neither a 1 or 2 HP unit will provide the flow rate and air speed to grab enough of the fine dust at source. To do this you will need ~4000 fpm linear airspeed and ~1000 cfm flow rates at the dust making source. The 400 fpm is easy to achieve (just make the collector aperture smaller) but doing that as well as achieving 1000 cfm is not so easy.

    While some 2HP units will claim they can deliver 1000+ cfm this is often the capacity of the impeller without any restrictions ie without any bags. filters and/or ducting. In practice no 2HP is likely to achieve 1000 cfm a few minutes after it has started to collect dust. My experienced is that manufacturer quoted CFMs should be divided by about 2 to provide a more realistic working CFM

    Of equal significance and acting as a counterbalance is where the DC is located. If a DC is located inside the work area, short of using a cyclone and a bank of HEPA filters at the outlet the fine dust will pour out of most DCs and fill up the work area. An alternative is to locate the DC outside the work area and duct the machines. I realize not everyone can do this but it is by far the safest method. Using longer and more ducting means lower CFM but the DC can always be left on for some time after the last dust making activity to clear the shed.

  11. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Newcastle
    Posts
    287

    Default

    Best I could do, at least initially, is wheel the dusty to the open garage door and hope the wind is blowing the right way! Will eventually go down the cyclone/better filter, would like to get some damned machines first.... these dustys are no fun at all!

  12. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    27,790

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Astrodog View Post
    Best I could do, at least initially, is wheel the dusty to the open garage door and hope the wind is blowing the right way! Will eventually go down the cyclone/better filter, would like to get some damned machines first.... these dustys are no fun at all!
    Unfortunately parking the DC in an opening such as a doorway is a waste of time. The DC creates a low pressure region of the machine and a high pressure in the region of the DC so the dust flow will be exactly from DC back to machine.

    An alternative to putting the DC outside the shed is to enclose the DC in an air tight cabinet and vent the cabinet to the outside. I have seen several very mice implementations of this.
    In both cases this also reduces the horrible noise these things make.

Similar Threads

  1. New Machinery
    By thedge in forum TABLE SAWS & COMBINATIONS
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 22nd March 2009, 09:47 PM
  2. Machinery
    By Different in forum WOODWORK - GENERAL
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 14th May 2008, 02:05 AM
  3. Machinery On E-Bay
    By Felder in forum HAND TOOLS - POWERED
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 9th August 2006, 04:07 PM
  4. Machinery etc
    By John Saxton in forum HINTS & TIPS
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 22nd May 2003, 05:23 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •