Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 18
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Belgrave, Victoria, Australia
    Posts
    234

    Default Bombe cabinet construction?

    Hi all,

    Having spent a bit of time browsing through books and sites on art deco design and furniture for a school project, i've come across a chiffonier that's piqued my interest.

    I've no plans to build one for myself any time this century since my skills are wayyyyyyyyyy below the required level to attempt it, but i was nonetheless curious as to how a cabinet like this might possibly be built, aside from what seems to me to be the enormously wasteful method of carving the curved bits out of solid timber...unless this is actually a viable method of producing it?

    It dates to around 1925 and was designed by andre groult.
    Its constructed from beech, mahogany, ivory and shagreen


    2c31698e4cfb6e70412d06d6ff5b1170.jpgAndré_Groult,_cassettone_antropomorphe,_parigi,_1925_ca..jpg

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Camden, NSW
    Age
    74
    Posts
    3,576

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fudo133 View Post

    aside from what seems to me to be the enormously wasteful method of carving the curved bits out of solid timber...unless this is actually a viable method of producing it?

    It dates to around 1925 and was designed by andre groult.
    Its constructed from beech, mahogany, ivory and shagreen

    Hi Fudo,
    It's wayyyyyy beyond the skills of most of us but, this time, I'm grateful!!
    Ive looked at making a French classic bombe dresser and all the examples I've researched had the shape carved from solid!
    I guess the definition of 'wasteful' and 'sustainable' have changed over the Century?
    It scares me a little that trees, elephants and sharks died to make that truncated peanut cabinet ....but that's just me!
    fletty
    a rock is an obsolete tool ......... until you don’t have a hammer!

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Belgrave, Victoria, Australia
    Posts
    234

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fletty View Post
    Hi Fudo,
    It's wayyyyyy beyond the skills of most of us but, this time, I'm grateful!!
    Ive looked at making a French classic bombe dresser and all the examples I've researched had the shape carved from solid!
    I guess the definition of 'wasteful' and 'sustainable' have changed over the Century?
    It scares me a little that trees, elephants and sharks died to make that truncated peanut cabinet ....but that's just me!
    fletty
    Likewise most of the ones i've seen seem to have been carved from solid, although i seem to recall reading/seeing something a while ago about some of them having being made up from blockwork, not unlike fronts on the rather fabulous cutlery boxes mic-d made a while back. https://www.woodworkforums.com/138610...eorgian-style/

    As for wastefulness, or rather...excess... i count upwards of 60 stingray hides in that cabinet... and that's without guessing how many are in the sides and the back of it...

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Belgrave, Victoria, Australia
    Posts
    234

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Brisbane (western suburbs)
    Age
    77
    Posts
    12,117

    Default

    I seem to recall an article in an early issue of Fine Woodworking on a bombe chest (in an eralier style, not art deco), in which the sides were glued up from partly-shaped staves, & the final shaping was done after. That might be what fudo133 means by 'blockwork'? If you've seen 18th C American pieces with the carved 'shell' tops, the shells were also made by glueing up multiple partly-shaped pieces, then carving the final shell shape. Both techniques used a lot of wood, nevertheless, though the shells are painted, and so a less-expensive & easy to carve wood like pine was used.

    To make a 'peanut' like the piece shown above without having to waste half a tree, you could use the technique of 'cold moulding' boat-builders have perfected. For such a complex shape, you would need a mould that could be dismantled & removed, once the initial layers were in place & set. Perhaps your piece was made using a similar method? Veneering the final shape with anything other than sharkskin or some synthetic substitute would be a challenge!

    Finally, there was a brief craze for paper-mache furniture in the late Victorian period. Some of it has survived, so it must've been a bit better than most of the plastic furniture made in my lifetime (). Again, you would need a dis-mantle-able or sacrificial mould, and a good idea of how you were going to finish it.

    It's a fugly bit of furniture to my eyes, too, but beauty is in the eye of the beholder. If they used a waterproof glue, you could always take the drawers out & use it as bath tub.....

    Cheers,
    IW

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Dundowran Beach
    Age
    76
    Posts
    19,922

    Post

    I'm a big fan of most things Art Deco - Except that!!

    I find that just plain old fugly!!

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Macksville
    Age
    62
    Posts
    391

    Default

    I think with his new found skills, Fletty should be able to knock one up using steam bent cedar I'm sure progresing to bending in 3D should be an easy step from chair slatts for someone with his skills.

  9. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Belgrave, Victoria, Australia
    Posts
    234

    Default

    I wasn't overly fond of it when i first saw it, maybe 10 years ago, but since then its grown on me quite a bit...i'm more asking out of general curiosity from a technical perspective.

    The first part of IanW's post pretty much hit my ideas about its construction on the head - making it up from multiple roughly shaped pieces and then shaping the final contours after everything's glued together. Extending on that a bit, here's a more modern piece of furniture that uses more or less the same technique to create a very interesting result (though its not something i'd have in my house given then choice)...

    42-demakersvan-table-cinderella-2005-600x450.jpg269-572-430-1.jpgDSC_2086.JPGfig1_three_sides_table.jpg

    Though interestingly, from a long term standpoint, this particular table doesnt appear as though its likely to last the test of time, at least going by the issues that have already started to appear... http://www.vam.ac.uk/content/journal...derella-table/

  10. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Camden, NSW
    Age
    74
    Posts
    3,576

    Default

    I also remember an article (FWW?) describing the block work that Fudo mentioned. A whole bombe dresser was made in 1" layers of shaped blocks that were then dressed to shape after being assembled and glued.
    BUT, before any of this talk possibly convinces someone to make their own mutant peanut I just need to 'say' something....
    I am a tolerant man. When I see something that I don't like I presume that is just a reflection of my nature and nurture and that someone else may, and is in fact entitled, to like! However, THIS piece is fugly! We should do NOTHING to allow it to breed nor multiply!
    Sharks, stingrays elephants and good taste ...rest easy tonight....
    fletty
    a rock is an obsolete tool ......... until you don’t have a hammer!

  11. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    back in Alberta for a while
    Age
    68
    Posts
    12,006

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fudo133 View Post
    Hi all,

    Having spent a bit of time browsing through books and sites on art deco design and furniture for a school project, i've come across a chiffonier that's piqued my interest.

    I've no plans to build one for myself any time this century since my skills are wayyyyyyyyyy below the required level to attempt it, but i was nonetheless curious as to how a cabinet like this might possibly be built, aside from what seems to me to be the enormously wasteful method of carving the curved bits out of solid timber...unless this is actually a viable method of producing it?

    It dates to around 1925 and was designed by andre groult.
    Its constructed from beech, mahogany, ivory and shagreen


    2c31698e4cfb6e70412d06d6ff5b1170.jpgAndré_Groult,_cassettone_antropomorphe,_parigi,_1925_ca..jpg
    despite looking like a villain from an episode of Dr Who ...

    it looks to be a combination of solid wood, segmental construction and veneer -- so not as wasteful (of wood) as a traditional Bombe chest which would be carved out of solid wood boards up to 6in thick.
    About a year ago, FWW had an article on building a traditional bombe chest
    regards from Alberta, Canada

    ian

  12. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    96

    Default

    Check out the article about Dan Faia's Bombe Chest build in Fine Woodworking issue # 234 (July/August 2013). Amazing build, tool around 2 years on and off.

  13. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Brisbane (western suburbs)
    Age
    77
    Posts
    12,117

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ian View Post
    .....About a year ago, FWW had an article on building a traditional bombe chest...
    Hmmm, when FWW started repeating itself (for the 3rd time), I reckoned the unit cost for the occasional gem was no longer economical, & I decided to subscribe to other mags. I haven't seen other than the very occasional FWW for the last 12 years, so wasn't aware of that article, Ian. The one I was referring to was back in the early 80s or maybe even before that....

    Quote Originally Posted by fletty View Post
    ......I am a tolerant man. When I see something that I don't like I presume that is just a reflection of my nature and nurture and that someone else may, and is in fact entitled, to like! However, THIS piece is fugly! We should do NOTHING to allow it to breed nor multiply!
    Sharks, stingrays elephants and good taste ...rest easy tonight.... fletty
    Can't help but agree with you, Fletty, however, I'm willing to accept there are other 'tastes'!

    The styles that appeal most to me are generally simple (or deceptively so, as I've sometimes discovered!), but I'm a card-carrying conservative when it comes to the decorative arts. There have been several periods in furniture history when fashions got a little lot over the top, but there are always folk who find such stuff exciting/beautiful/exotic, or whatever turns their crank, and genuinely like it. That's fine & good, & viva la difference - just as long as they don't ask you or me to "make one like it"!

    Cheers,



    Cheers,
    IW

  14. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    North Of The Boarder
    Age
    68
    Posts
    16,794

    Default

    Interesting piece for sure.
    To think of the engineering design and thought that went into this piece is amazing considering NO COMPUTERS were around.

    Not sure how you see using the skins as "Wasteful" what would be done with them otherwise? Tossed in to rubbish fill, back into the ocean? Should we not be using animal hides then?
    I see a waste of Ivory world wide from what has been collected from poachers ivory stock piles and whats done with it all its burnt, now thats a waste.

  15. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Belgrave, Victoria, Australia
    Posts
    234

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wheelinround View Post
    Interesting piece for sure.
    To think of the engineering design and thought that went into this piece is amazing considering NO COMPUTERS were around.

    Not sure how you see using the skins as "Wasteful" what would be done with them otherwise? Tossed in to rubbish fill, back into the ocean? Should we not be using animal hides then?
    I see a waste of Ivory world wide from what has been collected from poachers ivory stock piles and whats done with it all its burnt, now thats a waste.
    Hence why i corrected myself with 'excess' over wasteful...though i suppose that's just the nature of the beasty when it comes to using shagreen - small hides = needing to use heaps of them
    And definitely in agreement over those ivory stockpiles. SO much material wasted!

  16. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Albury Well Just Outside
    Posts
    13,315

    Default

    I am not sure how to word the comments on the cabinet with out being over the top. The shape is almost like a figure of a female, which also holds true of a peanut as was mention earlier. I am going to guess the earlier as that would have been easier to sell.


    Quote Originally Posted by wheelinround View Post
    ......I see a waste of Ivory world wide from what has been collected from poachers ivory stock piles and whats done with it all its burnt, now thats a waste.
    Quote Originally Posted by fudo133 View Post
    ......And definitely in agreement over those ivory stockpiles. SO much material wasted!
    Not wanting to distract from the original thread I voice my concerns in this thread,

    https://www.woodworkforums.com/showth...48#post1800248

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. General Thoughts On Cabinet Construction.
    By Wooden Mechanic in forum WOODWORK - GENERAL
    Replies: 68
    Last Post: 5th August 2009, 01:59 PM
  2. cabinet door construction
    By Strungout in forum WOODWORK - GENERAL
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 7th October 2007, 10:43 PM
  3. cabinet carcass construction
    By browny000 in forum WOODWORK - GENERAL
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 26th December 2006, 10:57 PM
  4. Q & D WS Cabinet #2 Construction Photos
    By MajorPanic in forum WOODWORK PICS
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 14th May 2005, 12:30 AM
  5. Interior Cabinet Frame Construction.
    By Different in forum WOODWORK - GENERAL
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 18th November 2004, 05:36 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •