Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Needs Pictures Needs Pictures:  0
Picture(s) thanks Picture(s) thanks:  0
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Mt Druitt NSW
    Age
    64
    Posts
    518

    Default Thicknesser or Planer Thicknesser (Jointer)

    The Dept of War has finally relented and said that I can spent some money on a thicknesser - Oh Joy and Bliss

    H&F are holding their annual sale - yee ha

    Out comes the catalogue and I see a planer thicknesser that to my eye looks like a jointer :confused:

    Ok which one is really going to be of better value - the 13" thicknesser or the planer thicknesser jointer thingy.

    What will it be used for looking to build a large floor to ceiling cupboard/bookshelf then new dining table. Have timber but needs change in size.

    One thing to note - the workshop is relatively small so machinery must be mobile.
    ______________
    Mark
    They only call it a rort if they're not in on it

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Age
    2010
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Werribee, Vic
    Age
    66
    Posts
    2,528

    Default

    Need a jointer first, then a thicknesser. 2 in one might be ok. Felders do it well but no experience with the cheaper ones.

    I have had a thicknesser for 2 years but don't use it much as I need the jointer

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Melbourne - Outer East Foothills
    Posts
    6,786

    Default

    Mark, to dress and size timber properly, you really need both machines. A thicknesser alone will make the timber the same thickness all the way through but won't flatten it (unless you stuff around with jigs).

    If unsure, check out the jointer/thicknesser video we have available in the video thread. It shows the use of a combination machine and could be just what you are looking for.

    Of all the cheap end combos, you'll find the ML 392 is the best.
    If at first you don't succeed, give something else a go. Life is far too short to waste time trying.

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Pambula
    Age
    58
    Posts
    12,779

    Default

    This can be very confusing. We all know what a thicknesser is. Some people call jointers "planers". Some people call thicknessers "thickness planers" and I've also come across "surface planer".

    If it looks like a jointer to you, then it is probably an over/under combo machine, which is both, hence "Planer thicknesser". Very good for people who don't have space for both machines.

    Do a search, there are pages and pages of arguments over the pros and cons. My preference is seperate machines and as far as I'm concerned, you need both.

    Based on your stated requirements, I think the combo may be the best for you.

  6. #5
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    426

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gumby View Post
    Mark, to dress and size timber properly, you really need both machines. A thicknesser alone will make the timber the same thickness all the way through but won't flatten it (unless you stuff around with jigs).

    If unsure, check out the jointer/thicknesser video we have available in the video thread. It shows the use of a combination machine and could be just what you are looking for.

    Of all the cheap end combos, you'll find the ML 392 is the best.
    Yeah what he said

    |^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| |^^^^^^^^^^^^^| ||
    | .....BIGGER ......._____| | ...BEER TRUCK.....| ||´|";,___.
    |_..._...__________/====|_..._..._______==|=||_|__|..., ] -
    "(@)´(@)"""´´" *|(@)(@) "(@)´(@)"""´´"*|(@)(@)****(@)

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Mt Druitt NSW
    Age
    64
    Posts
    518

    Default

    Had a look at the combination Planer Thicknesser (PT) and decided it really wasn't right for me:
    1. The PT used a fixed blade bar with a moveable floor to position the timber. I felt that the floor looked a bit ordinardy for a reasonably accurate cut and that it looked a bit on the short side too.
    2. The PT has to be extensively disassembled to convert to thicknesser mode and this is the mode that would be used most of the time. I would be left with a lot of spares to be stored for when I need the jointing mode.
    3. The weight of the PT at 65kg is moving out of the range that can be easily moved. My workshop is a large single car garage which means all machinery needs to be a virual pickup and carry to make way for the next machine. I would need lockable skates on the PT which would probably upset it.
    In the end I purchased the T13 portable thicknesser with stand & d/chute.

    I still have the Triton bench with its planer attachment its fiddly and a pain to get good accurate results but it still can do what I need if I persevere.

    Thanks to all who sent replies
    ______________
    Mark
    They only call it a rort if they're not in on it

Similar Threads

  1. What do you use as Winding Sticks?
    By derekcohen in forum HOMEMADE TOOLS AND JIGS ETC.
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 6th June 2006, 03:41 AM
  2. Thicknesser and Jointer
    By boxers in forum WOODWORK - GENERAL
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 30th September 2005, 05:39 PM
  3. Jointer Planer Thicknesser
    By MarpleMan in forum WOODWORK - GENERAL
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 22nd December 2004, 05:03 PM
  4. Blade setting in jointer, planer, thicknesser
    By Cliff Rogers in forum JOINTERS, MOULDERS, THICKNESSERS, ETC
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 17th March 2004, 06:16 PM
  5. Thicknesser or jointer planer
    By Woodster in forum JOINTERS, MOULDERS, THICKNESSERS, ETC
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 16th January 2004, 08:09 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •