Anorak Bob
10th December 2013, 04:58 PM
The workhead on the Hercus No.1 grinder has some modifications. Peter Fou..., the fellow I bought it from, replaced the 24 position indexing plate with an adjustable 12 position version. One of my favourite cutters is an eight flute endmill that desperately needs a sharpen. I wouldn't mind having a crack at making an indexer along the lines of the original but there may be a few issues that need addressing.
The idea behind the adjustable finger is to enable the precise alignment of the cutting edge in relation to the grinding wheel. Peter achieved the adjustment by means of a slotted indexing plate and a rigid plunger. Hercus provided a spring loaded adjustable finger. The finger could have been the Achilles's heel in the design. Gary at Eccentric Engineering ( Diamond Tool Holder ) said that his Hercus No.1 T + C workhead had also been modified. Whether the issue is with the spring steel and its installation or the shape and engagement of the pawl in the indexing plate, I don't know. These machines appear thin on the ground and the chance of finding one with the original indexer might be even thinner.
The spring steel on the finger in the catalogue images looks short and therefore I imagine stiff. It has to be flexible enough to rise up out of the vee and rigid enough that it stays in place. The spindle is lockable by means of a thumb screw operated cotter. Not that grinding should dislodge the finger.
I have been thinking of doing away with the spring steel and making the finger rigid with the springing occurring in the square head instead.
Has anyone had experience with this type of indexer ( Cincinnati's Milicron grinder had a somewhat similar set up but the indexer ratcheted one way ) and if so could they share that experience?
Bob.
296782
The idea behind the adjustable finger is to enable the precise alignment of the cutting edge in relation to the grinding wheel. Peter achieved the adjustment by means of a slotted indexing plate and a rigid plunger. Hercus provided a spring loaded adjustable finger. The finger could have been the Achilles's heel in the design. Gary at Eccentric Engineering ( Diamond Tool Holder ) said that his Hercus No.1 T + C workhead had also been modified. Whether the issue is with the spring steel and its installation or the shape and engagement of the pawl in the indexing plate, I don't know. These machines appear thin on the ground and the chance of finding one with the original indexer might be even thinner.
The spring steel on the finger in the catalogue images looks short and therefore I imagine stiff. It has to be flexible enough to rise up out of the vee and rigid enough that it stays in place. The spindle is lockable by means of a thumb screw operated cotter. Not that grinding should dislodge the finger.
I have been thinking of doing away with the spring steel and making the finger rigid with the springing occurring in the square head instead.
Has anyone had experience with this type of indexer ( Cincinnati's Milicron grinder had a somewhat similar set up but the indexer ratcheted one way ) and if so could they share that experience?
Bob.
296782