PDA

View Full Version : Tensioning a backsaw plate



rob streeper
5th November 2014, 05:57 AM
I did a quick search of this site and I didn't find (at least over the past couple of years that is) a posting specifically discussing saw-plate tensioning so here goes.

I've read and heard a lot of conflicting opinion on the subject of saw-plate tensioning. Some consider it a vital and often overlooked part of the processes of making and maintaining saws, others call it hokum.

In my experience making my own saws I have come to find that saw plate tensioning, for want of a better term, is vital to producing a saw with a straight tooth line. I only make backsaws using folded backs because I like the traditional looks as well as the servicability afforded because they can easily be removed and replaced without resort to heat-guns and/or solvents to remove the plates of saws made with slotted backs.

I make my backs by driving the back down the length of the saw plate, some call this the 'side-entry' technique. My backs have zero-clearance between the lips of the back when I'm done folding them which prevents driving the plate down on to the plate perpendicular to the long axis of the back.

Here's an illustration.

330321


As the back is driven from left to right down the saw plate the friction between the lips of the back and the top of the saw plate tends to stretch the plate ever so slightly. The tooth line however is not stretched and the differential stresses applied to the saw plate tend to cause the toot line side of the plate to wrinkle. This is a problem when using thinner saw plates and it is particularly acute when I put backs on my taper-ground 0.015" saw plates. These saw plates generally taper between 0.002" and 0.003" from the tooth line to the bottom of the back and unless properly tensioned they are impossible to get straight.

In the process of changing the position of the back on a saw I thought to document the process of tensioning on a saw build I have described on another thread in this section (http://www.woodworkforums.com/showthread.php?t=181862&page=2).

First here's the saw.

330322


It's my interpretation of a Disston #4, the saw plate is 0.0155" tapering to 0.0135" measured just below the back. When I was setting up this saw I originally fitted a stainless back but found that it was too light for my liking and switched to one of my 0.125" thick heavy brass backs. I got the saw back together and found that the projection of the back above it's mortise in the stock was higher than I like.

330323


This is how the tooth line looked before I started.

330333


So I need to move it down and deepen the mortise to suit. First I took the plate/back assembly out of the stock and clamped the toe end of the plate gently but firmly in the vise.

330324


You want the vise tight enough to hold the plate without slipping but not so tight as to dent the plate with the vise jaw serrations.
Now to induce some flex to the plate I use my patent-pending saw-back remover to lever the back up.

330325


Now that's not very pretty is it?

330326


So how to fix it? First clamp the plate up in the vise and then, with a soft faced hammer tap the back back down onto the plate VERY GENTLY.

330327


As you tap you will notice two effects. First the tooth-line will visibly straighten and second the ringing sound of the plate will decrease in frequency until it reaches a minimum.

better 330328 better still 330329 good 330330


Then, if there is any residual ripple in the plate toward the heel swap the plate around in the vise and tap lightly on the heel end of the back.

330331


And finally we're straight again.

330332


And the back is down where I want it to be.

P.S.,

If the back is already stuffed all the way down on the saw plate you won't get anywhere tapping it down, you must first pry it up a bit using the patent-pending saw back remover. :)

planemaker
5th November 2014, 11:12 AM
Excellent tutorial Rob. Its the 1st I have come across that explains the topic extremely well. Kudos.

Stewie :2tsup:

RayG
5th November 2014, 12:14 PM
Thanks Rob,

Ahh... slit backs or folded backs ... You might open a can of worms with this discussion, :D


Just a query, as you tension the blade, wouldn't the ringing frequency increase rather than decrease?


Nice description of the process :2tsup:


Ray

rob streeper
5th November 2014, 12:20 PM
Ray,

Let's hope the worms stay in their cans - don't need battles over trivialities.

Frequency wise, I can only say what I hear. May be that the vise damps the higher frequencies or it may be that I've lost hearing in that range, or both.

Cheers,
Rob

rob streeper
10th April 2016, 09:36 AM
Browsing on eBay today I happened on this posting. Lie Nielsen Tappered Carcass Saw 14 PPI 14 inch Saw Plate Needs Repair | eBay (http://www.ebay.com/itm/Lie-Nielsen-Tappered-Carcass-Saw-14-ppi-14-inch-saw-plate-needs-repair-/162033159636?)

Wherein the seller writes: "THE SAW FELL OF A PEG RACK I HAVE IN THE SHOP ABOUT 4 FEET OFF THE GROUND, THE SAW PLATE HAS A SIGNIFICANT WAVE IN IT AND I DO NOT CARE TO REPAIR IT"

Here's a picture of the wave.

376346

I thought that the bond between the blade and the back in this type of saw was sufficiently strong to prevent this kind of damage. Has anybody else had similar happen?

The fix here should be pretty straightforward.

planemaker
10th April 2016, 11:33 AM
Rob. This may best explain why the saw plate dislodged after being dropped.

regards Stewie;


Lie-Neilsen wrote:
We slit the brass backs to receive the saw plates, then rather than just relying on friction and adhesive to hold them in place, we compress the brass back onto the plate, which also increases the tension in the plate.

rob streeper
10th April 2016, 11:46 AM
Interesting, kind of a hybrid between the glue-in slotted and gripping method of folded backs. Should be very easy to fix in light of the construction method. I have a number of LN and Wenzloff slotted saws and have never had a blade slip.

planemaker
10th April 2016, 12:11 PM
Rob. The following discussion on the UK Forum may be of some interest to you; Panel Saw Tensioning : Hand Tools - UKworkshop.co.uk (http://www.ukworkshop.co.uk/forums/panel-saw-tensioning-t96004.html)

Stewie;

rob streeper
10th April 2016, 12:32 PM
Rob. The following discussion on the UK Forum may be of some interest to you; Panel Saw Tensioning : Hand Tools - UKworkshop.co.uk (http://www.ukworkshop.co.uk/forums/panel-saw-tensioning-t96004.html)

Stewie;

Thanks Stewie, I'm content to continue posting here as this is the most civil on-line woodworking community I've encountered to date.

Bushmiller
10th April 2016, 04:17 PM
Rob

This is a really good topic and very well thought out by you. I am going to have to study it a good deal more carefully than I already have. Thank you for the time and effort.

On the subject of civility I would like to think that this forum is better than most: In fact I think it is, but when we step out of line, which does happen, sometimes deliberately and sometimes inadvertently, either the mods or our peers step in fairly smartly.

I particularly like the fact that there are many Forum members with a huge store of expertise, some have already contributed to your thread, and yet they converse with mere mortals as if they are just the same. :cool:

The human quality of humility I prize above almost all others.

Regards
Paul

rob streeper
10th April 2016, 11:07 PM
Thanks Paul,

I've learned this as I've gone along. Nothing profound in this area but there's a lot of myth, myth-making, misinformation and active disinformation involved.

Many woodworking communities on-line appear to operate as clique's composed of two groups: Cognoscenti and plebs. I've looked into the pattern of behavior and to me it sounds a lot like tribalism and or feudalism which is, as I'm prone to say interesting.

I do this kind of work because, for me, it's fun. I strongly dislike like the acrimony that is displayed far too often because that takes all of the fun out of it.

Cheers,
Rob