Mobyturns
5th October 2016, 08:12 AM
Having had the honour of being invited into Jim's shed, and having made an assessment of his situation I've attempted to make an estimation on the completion date for the "cleanup".
The calculation was far more complex than I had ever envisaged as I factored in the inventory on hand, rate of acquisition of new stock, production rate, waste creation, waste removal, very low burn pile attrition factor, hidden treasures, long forgotten stockpiles, white ant factors, big boys toys on hand, tool inventory, visitor distraction, smoko factor, WIP preparation etc.
I concluded that even though sales were relatively high and completed stock inventory turnover was good, the rate of creation of new waste still greatly exceeds the removal rate of old waste. The "in shed" distraction factor and hidden stock inventory was unusually high creating anomalies that I could not account for even when I severely discounted "the bower bird" factor. The fact that Jim does not normaly core blanks and that I didn't see any coring tools very favourably skewed calculation's, though I strongly suspect that there are long standing systemic problems with tool inventory control and disclosed tool inventory levels.
Outside influences in what I have now deemed the "Sharon Factor" did seem quite favourable to the desired outcome and did affect calculations significantly however I have low confidence in that trend being maintained over the longer term.
My conclusion is that the outcome is quite favourable to Jim - an indeterminate clean up date, so he had better hang around for a long while yet and get on with the "cleanup". :U
The calculation was far more complex than I had ever envisaged as I factored in the inventory on hand, rate of acquisition of new stock, production rate, waste creation, waste removal, very low burn pile attrition factor, hidden treasures, long forgotten stockpiles, white ant factors, big boys toys on hand, tool inventory, visitor distraction, smoko factor, WIP preparation etc.
I concluded that even though sales were relatively high and completed stock inventory turnover was good, the rate of creation of new waste still greatly exceeds the removal rate of old waste. The "in shed" distraction factor and hidden stock inventory was unusually high creating anomalies that I could not account for even when I severely discounted "the bower bird" factor. The fact that Jim does not normaly core blanks and that I didn't see any coring tools very favourably skewed calculation's, though I strongly suspect that there are long standing systemic problems with tool inventory control and disclosed tool inventory levels.
Outside influences in what I have now deemed the "Sharon Factor" did seem quite favourable to the desired outcome and did affect calculations significantly however I have low confidence in that trend being maintained over the longer term.
My conclusion is that the outcome is quite favourable to Jim - an indeterminate clean up date, so he had better hang around for a long while yet and get on with the "cleanup". :U