Needs Pictures: 0
Picture(s) thanks: 0
Results 1 to 8 of 8
Thread: Sir John Falstaff?
-
21st August 2014, 06:31 PM #1SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- Feb 2012
- Location
- Denmark, WA
- Age
- 66
- Posts
- 174
Sir John Falstaff?
IMG_1215.JPGIMG_1216.JPGIMG_1218.JPGIMG_1219.JPGIMG_1220.JPG
From Ian Norbury's "Techniques in creative woodcarving". 250h x 250 x 200 Silver Wattle (Acacia Dealbata).
Turned out much slimmer than he should and I gave up on the attached/carved chair fairly early in the process. I managed to complete this without any breakages and given the delicacy of the left hand I am pleased with that.
I am really struggling to get good facial detail/expressions. I understand this is in part due to the small scale.
I used my new flexshaft/rotary carver for some of the trickier details - until I caught the burr on my glove and snapped the shaft!!. A bit of a learning curve to work through, but I can see this being really useful.
Comments/criticism, as always, welcomed.
Philip.
-
21st August 2014 06:31 PM # ADSGoogle Adsense Advertisement
- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Age
- 2010
- Posts
- Many
-
21st August 2014, 07:50 PM #2
I'm impressed, Ian is just the best imo
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD"We must never become callous. When we experience the conflicts ever more deeply we are living in truth. The quiet conscience is an invention of the devil." - Albert Schweizer
My blog. http://theupanddownblog.blogspot.com
-
22nd August 2014, 02:40 AM #3Senior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
- Location
- Perth
- Posts
- 470
I think you have done very good job, anything small scale is always much harder I find, I use the flex shaft rotary carver a fair bit for detailing as well but when you watch Norbury he always just uses chisels or knives. I follow Ian Norbury's WIPs on facebook all the time and even with plans and step by step instruction he is still so hard to replicate, he's work is just mind blowing. Nice color and grain in the wood, what's silver wattle like to carve?
-
22nd August 2014, 06:43 AM #4
Nice work on such a small scale, the hands look great.They say hands and feet are the most difficult to carve.
i am carving a piece by Ian Norbury at the moment but had to scale it down a lot to get it to fit on a hiking pole.
just hope i can get the level of detail you have achieved
-
22nd August 2014, 08:45 AM #5SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- Mar 2014
- Location
- UK
- Posts
- 349
You're doing fine very well mate, the hand is especially good - as for capturing expression in faces - there's NOTHING harder & nothing so subtle in woodcarving . A lot of practice is the only solution, preferably not on a major project but on practice "masks" at a similar scale at which you normally work, this will speed your learning progress. However I can see from your work that you are on the cusp of major break throughs - just persist with faith as you are doing- there's much to admire about your work.
Remember there can hardly be one carving that any carver has ever done that he is 100% satisfied with, there is always room for improvement , otherwise why would we keep carving ! Woodcarving is the hardest of arts & crafts there is, bar none !
-
22nd August 2014, 08:46 AM #6SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- Feb 2012
- Location
- Denmark, WA
- Age
- 66
- Posts
- 174
Hi Rob.
I find I am happier with the look of the timber straight of the chisel. But in those tricky corners where it feels more like you are chewing than cutting the timber the flex shaft is an improvement.
I quite like the timber for carving. Though I do not have a lot of experience with other timbers for comparison.
Mostly, it seems not too hard but with enough 'resistance' (if that's the right word) to work against the grain when required. Carving end grain is hard work. Tools don't go blunt too quickly, though more quickly than with the Celery Top Pine I am working on at the moment.
The stuff I have, which was rescued from a tree dropped by the council and left for firewood, has a fair bit of borer activity. That is the reason I stained this piece as there are a number of filled holes.
I'm guessing that the ability Ian Norbury, and others, have to capture subtle nuances of facial expression even at very small scale is what sets them apart. Here's hoping that it is a skill which can be learned through practice!
Philip.
-
22nd August 2014, 09:02 AM #7SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- Feb 2012
- Location
- Denmark, WA
- Age
- 66
- Posts
- 174
Thanks Mike.
Your comment re the hand is interesting. I am very pleased with how this turned out and yet when I study it closely it really only approximates a hand. This has had me thinking about how impressionist paintings work. I like the idea that you can portray something convincingly without necessarily nailing every detail. I now need to work on producing this effect by design, not accident.
Philip.
-
22nd August 2014, 09:45 AM #8SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- Mar 2014
- Location
- UK
- Posts
- 349
Often in art it is said " it is better to suggest than be explicit " that way the suggestion gives a springboard for the viewers imagination & it is definitely more satisfying BUT how to suggest that in super-defined 3D sculptural terms ? Difficult, I've found !
I totally avoid sanding, try to use facets to catch the light - It's very hard in sculpture although I have had some success at capturing the feeling in other media. Rodin & Degas might give us some clues ?
Similar Threads
-
big john
By mongrell in forum INTARSIAReplies: 11Last Post: 28th May 2009, 06:44 PM -
John's Last Wish
By wheelinround in forum WOODIES JOKESReplies: 4Last Post: 30th March 2008, 11:01 AM -
The John
By Elbow in forum WOODIES JOKESReplies: 0Last Post: 7th March 2008, 11:03 AM -
Sorry John
By Barry Hicks in forum WOODIES JOKESReplies: 5Last Post: 10th October 2007, 07:43 PM