Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Needs Pictures: 0
Picture(s) thanks: 0
Results 1 to 15 of 47
-
27th August 2006, 07:59 PM #1
Basic geometry instead of measuring?
In the days of yore, before calculators, lookup charts and the like were even thought of, let alone in common use, there were ye fewe symple methods for marking out shapes and proportions. Basic geometry, that only needs a ruler, pencil and compass. My grandfather taught me a few of these methods and some I use on a regular basis. Sadly, there's some I thought I knew, but now that it has come to the crunch... well... I don't remember.
eg. One we all should know is: to check a rectangle's truly squared, simply measure the diagonals. But did you know that you can mark out an accurate square, armed only with a ruler and compass? :eek: Similarly, let's say you're cutting the top or base for an octagonal box. It's a very simple matter to mark out a suitably sized square of stock, ready for trimming into an octagon. No faffing around working out angles and lengths... just a couple of pencil strokes and scribing four arcs with the compass.
OK, what I'm having trouble remembering is laying out Golden Rectangles. (I assume that you know about the Golden Mean and how it pertains to aesthetics and proportions. If not, google it. ) I remember how to determine the length given a predetermined width but I can't for the life of me remember how to work the other way and determine the width given a predetermined length.
Anybody out there know what I'm talking about? I've tried googling for these old layout techniques and can't find one single lousy reference :mad: yet they used to be so common, once upon a time. Are they disappearing from our hi-tek world? I wonder if 'tis worth starting a new thread where we can keep these old methods alive for a bit longer...
- Andy Mc
-
27th August 2006 07:59 PM # ADSGoogle Adsense Advertisement
- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Age
- 2010
- Posts
- Many
-
27th August 2006, 08:18 PM #2
Skew,
have a look at theses two sites which provide the info below
http://www.math.harvard.edu/~ctm/gal...old/index.html
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/GoldenRatio.html
The ratio is 1: 1.618033989. or you could try the following:
Draw the square , call the midpoint of , so that . Now draw the segment , which has length
<TABLE style="PADDING- 50px" cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" align=center><TBODY><TR><TD align=left></TD><TD align=right width=3>(1)</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
and construct with this length. Now complete the rectangle , which is golden since
<TABLE style="PADDING- 50px" cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" align=center><TBODY><TR><TD align=left></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
-
27th August 2006, 08:20 PM #3
Hi Skew!
If you know the ratio for determining a length from a given width (presumably a multiple, ie 1:1.1618 (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_ratio . See also a paper on Fibonacci numbers at http://www.mcs.surrey.ac.uk/Personal.../fibInArt.html)) , then for a given length the width will be ascertained by dividing that width by the same ratio.
Edit: Ach! Ian beat me to it
-
27th August 2006, 08:45 PM #4
Thanks fellas, but that diagram shows how I determine the length for a given width, CD in that diagram. I simply mark the width along one edge (DB) and half the width along the other (CE) then set a compass to the length of EB and scribe an arc using E as the origin. It will intersect at F, giving me the desired length.
No maths involved (apart from determining half the width ) and laid out with minimal tools in a matter of seconds.
Unfortunately, this doesn't work in reverse... given the length CF it's not possible to simply determine EB to set the compass, let alone work backwards to find CD! And yet I'm damned sure my grandfather showed me a way that it could be done. Again, with just a ruler and a compass.
I know this is one of the more "fiddly" methods, but there's a lot of similar, simpler tricks I've forgotten too. It's sad to see this knowledge disappearing, seemingly without trace.
Just as an aside, have either of you tried doing any inlay/veneer work using fibonacci or golden spirals? 'Tis far beyond my skills at the moment but I will make a coffe table that way one day. Glorious to look at and automatically the right proportions.
- Andy Mc
-
27th August 2006, 09:00 PM #5
Gday Skew, interesting thread.
Did a google for myself & sussed out a few sites, this one may be of interest, particularly the bit under "THE NEW SOLUTION
The 1 : 2 rectangle and the Egyptian Rope Measurers "
Tried to figure it out but brain overload right now Got me intrigued, tho, will keep thinking about it
Cheers....................Sean
The beatings will continue until morale improves.
-
27th August 2006, 09:20 PM #6
Thanks Scooter, the 1:2 method seems to ring a bell.
ie. Mark a "temporary width" of 1/2 the length, determine the diagonal then subtract the "temporary width" from the diagonal and use the remnant as the final width.
ARGH! My brain hurts... but I think that's it. Either that or it has to do with something else I've forgotten.
- Andy Mc
-
27th August 2006, 09:21 PM #7
I've seen some work involving the fibonacci series (or golden spirals), but for me too that is way beyond my current skill level.
Hell's teeth, even Domi couldn't do those
-
27th August 2006, 09:21 PM #8
I haven't drawn this out, but if I remember correctly (the famous alternative for "I think") you can sub-divide a square using the golden ratio.
So if you know CF [=(1+sq.root(5))*x] you construct a square of side CF and then subdivide the square as above, to get a BE = sq.root(5)*a*x, where a=1+sq.root(5)
You can then use proportions to find the original x
ian
-
28th August 2006, 01:26 AM #9
Just draw in line GC
Skew,
I think if you just draw in line GC on Ian's diagram, where that line intersects AB will be the width you want. Then just construct a perpendicular from AB to CD and your rectangle is right there from D to B to the other two new points. This is all provided CD and thus BD are your original lengths. There are simpler methods, but making diagrams is a pain in the butt, and I just used the one that was there.
-
28th August 2006, 01:28 AM #10
Correction - the new rectangle is from C to A to the two newly constructed points.
-
28th August 2006, 09:02 AM #11Originally Posted by Skew ChiDAMN!!
- draw a rectangle ABCD with AB being of length x and AC of length x/2.
- Draw the diagonal AD.
- Find the point E such that DE is of length x/2.
- Find the point F such that AF is the same length as AE.
- ABFG is what you are looking for
-
28th August 2006, 09:29 AM #12
Proportional dividers?
-
28th August 2006, 03:06 PM #13rrich Guest
You don't want to hear this...
In another life, FIDM was experiencing communications problems. I had to take the Agilent Network Analyzer to the site and define the cause of the problem.
Due to production issues, IT would only let us insert the analyzer during lunch hour or after hours. While waiting, I was browsing in their book store. For about $4 I purchased a "Proportional Scale". (Really a circular slide rule with an added scale for proportions.)
http://www.cthruruler.com/search/search_results2.php
I have the PS 69 model and use it regularly.
UNFORTUNATELY, it is an Imperial based device.
-
28th August 2006, 03:28 PM #14
Yeah, those proportional scales are good.
I use a pilot's navigation circular slide-rule, which works for any system.
Come to think of it, I see a lot of old-fashioned slide rules at flea markets for not much money. You could get one and make a reference mark at phi so that all of this proportional work is painless.
I know that this thread is about striking dimensions with drawing tools, and to that end I'll say that the Dover reprint of "The American Builder's Companion", published in 1827 has all of the drawing methods you'd ever want, including how to project complex mouldings. (The golden ratio is not mentioned per se, but the four orders of architecture are, and they contain this ratio. Ionic volutes are explained, and they are a derivative expression on phi)
This book was in its day the last word on proportion, ornament and style, and I get new insights every time I leaf through it.
Greg
-
28th August 2006, 05:53 PM #15Originally Posted by javali
Originally Posted by Skew ChiDAMN!!
Originally Posted by gregoryq
- Andy Mc
Similar Threads
-
Basic box strength
By CarpeNoctem in forum WOODWORK - GENERALReplies: 8Last Post: 21st October 2005, 07:55 AM -
Measuring Habits
By NewLou in forum POLLSReplies: 8Last Post: 8th June 2005, 07:36 PM -
The most basic wood cutting question??
By Acrapone in forum WOODWORK - GENERALReplies: 15Last Post: 3rd January 2005, 02:28 PM -
A basic shelf unit
By Craig Gordon in forum WOODWORK PICSReplies: 3Last Post: 20th September 2004, 01:12 PM -
Some basic info on working CCA
By Eastie in forum HINTS & TIPSReplies: 0Last Post: 28th February 2003, 02:27 PM