Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Needs Pictures: 0
Picture(s) thanks: 0
Results 1 to 15 of 29
Thread: Chinese Furniture and Joinery
-
11th April 2007, 09:35 PM #1
Chinese Furniture and Joinery
Today I went inspiration hunting by visiting an antique Chinese / Japanese Furniture store here in Melbourne. The interesting thing for me was the style, as well as the fit and finish of the antiques, most of which date from the 18th century.
The first thing that struck me was how organic most of the pieces where and how they draw you in to touch, use and explore the furniture, I really felt the humanity of these pieces.
I was hard pressed to find a single square edge or angle on anything. The timber was often rustic and weathered. Often using Scribe-fit Joinery. Their was not a flat surface to be found, table tops undulated between individual boards. Often surfaces could be seen to have major depressions, and hollows, that seem to have been present in the timber when first constructed.
Another interesting observation was in the construction of the carcass and the use of wedged through mortise and tenon joints, that would show the carcasses faces. The existence of end grain protruding from virtually all faces of cabinets created a very nice shift in texture from long to end grain.
Now this furniture was unlike the upper class replicas you find in Pharan and the High street antique dealers. It had a very provincial feeling of rural china.
The question is this rustic / ruff / split furniture the consequence of circumstance and design. Or is it simple the result of 200 years of use and possible abuse.
The other interesting thing is the joinery, while some pieces had the most complex joints I have seen. Their was also a suppressing level of crude simplicity to things like draws. It reminded me of the comment made by Adam Cherubini 17th c work is pretty crude. I don’t think I was the only one struggling to admire the designs, joinery, and surface work. Despite the value in seeing other furniture styles, other solutions to similar problems, there was a refreshing “just do it” aspect to the demonstrations that I found encouraging. The drawer front is attached to this side hung drawer with a single dovetail. The bottom is made up of spare clapboards or simple riven billets.
The buddhist in me sees the beauty of imperfection. To me it raises the question about the absolutist empiricist approach of modern furniture, with its 10,000 of an inch precision. Do we lose our humanity to the machine.
I also was fascinated with the Pinned Box Joints the chinese use, the feeling of running my finger along the joint, feeling the pins. Felling the variance in texture.
Their was much more wonders I discovered, however it has enthused in me the desire to learn more about Chinese furniture. This is were I need a little help. I did a little google but found nothing bar a few pages with the same content word for word. The rest was just retail stores.
So can anyone recommend me a site on Chinese furniture or even a book that would show design, history, plans and joinery? That would get me building.
-
11th April 2007 09:35 PM # ADSGoogle Adsense Advertisement
- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Posts
- Many
-
12th April 2007, 05:29 AM #2GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- Sydney,Australia
- Posts
- 3,157
OOoohh - what you just said First, do a search on Amazon.com under 'Chinese Furniture' then open your wallet & say after me 'Help Yourself' There are a few 'Dover' paper backs of old books that are good - ETC Wagner is one author IIRC. Then things rapidly run into the $100's - been there, still there.
-
12th April 2007, 10:02 AM #3GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- Bowral, NSW, Australia
- Age
- 74
- Posts
- 1,471
There was a very interesting article in Wood review about Chinese woodworkers in Australia in the 19th Century. I became interested because my son bught an old dresser that had a mark inside one of the drawers. They used hand tools very much like the ones that are available from HNT Gordon etc. (which are a pleasure to use by the way).
Will look up the reference later.
regards
CP
-
12th April 2007, 10:32 AM #4
Thanks for that excellent post thumbsucker. Many of the points you raised resonated with me, trying as I am to realise the 'zen' of wood. There is indeed a beauty in imperfection -- the imperfection of letting nature be itself, while adapting it to our purposes. There is certainly much imperfection in my pieces...sometimes all I see is a composition of 'stuff-ups': yet I can be satisfied, while yearning for higher achievement.
I'd say that you don't have to delve into chinese or japanese designs to explore, as you say, the 'buddhist' beauty of woodwork (interesting as these cultures are). Pick a project you need for the house, and take a 'just-do-it' approach. The piece will then reflect who you are and the influences from your particular surroundings. As you become steeped in oriental inlfuences, these will begin to show in your work.
Can you post an example of the chinese pinned box joint you are referring to?Those are my principles, and if you don't like them . . . well, I have others.
-
12th April 2007, 11:07 AM #5
aaah Thumbsucker, the questions you have asked!
I lived in China for a couple of years and only came back 2 weeks ago from another visit. I have a house full of Chinese furniture and everything I make for us has to fit in. I can recommend the book by Gustav Ecke, I can't remember the title but will post tonight, and it illustrates just how all of the joinery fits together. I am currently repairing a beautiful old Chinese table ($160 in King St Newtown, Sydney) and without the book I would not have been able to work out that the whole thing is held together by 8 rough, tiny dowels .... just beautiful.
There is so much to learn!
Fletty
-
12th April 2007, 06:05 PM #6
It looks like I am not alone in my appreciation.
I totally agree that and that wood has its own character its own imperfections in grain, texture, shape and form, and it is that which very much makes it such a beautiful medium.
I think I really like the joints, however its also the proportion and scale. The dimension of the pieces. While the impression is of fine strong lines, the furniture has an amazing level of weight and rigidity for pieces of such delicate appearance.
Please see the two photos attached of a pin box joint. Its almost a cross between a finger and dowel joint and even a touch of dovetail.
I did a search on Amazon and came across Chinese Domestic Furniture in Photographs and Measured Drawings (Dover Books on Furniture) by Gustav Ecke (Author) - which is well reviewed.
I also found Greene and Greene: Masterworks by Bruce Smith As Green and Green drew heavily from Chinese Furniture I think it may be of interest.
Their are few books as well but I need to have a closer look.
Their is actually some information on the Chinese Influence on Australian furniture making especially in Victoria, as many Chinese who came to work the gold field in Victoria where from Souther China and after the gold ran out many turned to furniture making as a trade because of their experience in Southern China as furniture makers (southern China was a major production centre for all of China). It was also interesting to read how the Chinese were not allowed to join the Furniture Union and how they were discriminated against by law.
Carry Pine - the saidold dresser that had a mark inside one of the drawers
I will dig up the info again.
Yes the HNT Gordon planes look more and more interesting the more I work in Australian Timbers.
-
12th April 2007, 06:34 PM #7
Undulations, depressions and hollows, not a flat surface to be seen...?
It would appear I've been making Chinese furniture for years without knowing it. Just not with so much of the "Zen."
The pinned box joint is something I came across a few years back, used on an old tool chest of unknown heritage, and I experimented with it for a while before settling on my own... "Shaker/Colonial style" of doing things... and promptly forgetting about it. May have to reconsider now that you've reminded me of it; 'tis a simple way of adding a bit of decoration now that I'm moving away from austere.
- Andy Mc
-
12th April 2007, 06:57 PM #8
Makes sense, I've got an old silky oak side board that I restored which has stamped in ink on the back of one of the drawers "made with european labour". Beautiful timber, but really badly built piece, it was splitting apart as long grain pieces had been fixed across end grain
Mick"If you need a machine today and don't buy it,
tomorrow you will have paid for it and not have it."
- Henry Ford 1938
-
12th April 2007, 07:39 PM #9
Here is the furniture making industry article from the Chinese museum.
-
12th April 2007, 08:51 PM #10
Thanks for that, interesting reading. I was told that the stamp on mine about Eurpean Labour dated it to the 1930's, but this article seems to suggest otherwise. It does have machine cut dovetails on the drawers though, don't know if that helps date it more accurately.
Mick"If you need a machine today and don't buy it,
tomorrow you will have paid for it and not have it."
- Henry Ford 1938
-
12th April 2007, 10:00 PM #11
-
12th April 2007, 10:13 PM #12.
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- Victoria
- Posts
- 5,215
Fletty its called " Chineese Domestic Furniture" and if anyone has Fine Woodworking Issue 175, they will read a review of it. A beautifull and inspiring book.
The person i most admire is James Krenov and his style of furniture making has deep Chineese roots. His furniture is almost perfect in its imperfection.
Great topic Thumb
-
12th April 2007, 11:47 PM #13....a Furnitologist
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Long Island NY, USA
- Posts
- 15
Chinese Furniture
Hey Thumbsucker:
I really enjoyed your post and the thought that others interspersed.
THANKS..........that was a good read ..........Neil
-
13th April 2007, 12:27 AM #14
It is the one in the little trendy strip of Northcote on high street, between Westgarth and Candy Street.
I do not know of a Chinese furniture shop in Clifton Hill. Maybe you are thinking of the Northcote one, right next to each other.
The person i most admire is James Krenov and his style of furniture making has deep Chinese roots. His furniture is almost perfect in its imperfection.
-
13th April 2007, 01:23 AM #15
To continue the discussion I made more observations about some of the design elements used. I am not sure if these design elements are common outside china but I have never seen them before so it maybe of interest.
One of the draws I pulled out had an interesting feature, the side face draws were about 25% longer then the draw bottom. This meant that you could pull the draw all the way out to see all of the draw content without risking tipping the draw out as you dig around.
Another interesting find was the draw bottoms, one piece had draw bottoms unlike any I had ever seen. The draw bottom was recessed into a groove. The trick was that the draw bottom was mould with a type of Base Cap moulding This allows the draw bottom to be heavy and strong and it also wedges it in tightly into the groves. It also gave the draw a feeling of being substantial.
Finally were the locks - reminding me of the Krenov latch. The feeling of wood against wood is nice. You can see an example of it Here. Its so simple but it works. Just assemble a self wedging bar inside the cabinet handles.
Similar Threads
-
Best Books Revisited
By Lignum in forum WOODWORK - GENERALReplies: 12Last Post: 23rd November 2005, 07:10 PM -
The complete illustrated guide to joinery
By macandrita in forum TRITON / GMCReplies: 0Last Post: 8th November 2003, 10:21 AM -
Tas Oak Timber for Furniture
By Ren in forum WOODWORK - GENERALReplies: 0Last Post: 6th November 2003, 10:53 PM