Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 32 of 32
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    146

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by artme View Post
    Remember the Mar's lander that crashed and burnt??

    Two teams worked on that. The mathematicians , who worked in miles, yads and feet-
    and the programers who worked in kilometres and metres.
    Close. NASA (and technically the US government) works in Metric, because they are not stupid and metric is about a billion times better than imperial, but one company (Lockheed Martin) didnt get that memo, and so provided thruster performance data to NASA in pound force seconds instead of newton seconds and then there was an explosion.

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #32
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Bundaberg
    Age
    54
    Posts
    3,428

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by yowie View Post
    The RAN was imperial because the ships were American. All the Anzacs etc are metric except for a few American systems on board. CWIS being the main one.
    Not quite, only the DDG's, LPA's and FFg's were US everything else were British (DE's, Fremantles, LSH, LCH's and Oberons). Anzacs actually have an awful lot of US equipment fitted to them: GE LM2500 gas turbine, 5" gun, Evolved Sea Sparrow Missile system and plenty of sensor/communications equipment; all of which use Imperial fasteners. All young MT and WE sailors who join Anzacs quickly learn why the toolboxes still have Imperial spanners in them...

    However the Phalanx CIWS (Close In Weapons System) is only fitted to FFG's and the pair of Anzac's owned by NZ; it was "fitted for but not with" the Aussie FFH's. Calling Phalanx "CIWS" (pron. "sea-wiz) is a pet hate of mine....

    The Anzac FFH without a shadow of a doubt was the biggest foul up the RAN ever made; they have been responsible for the wholesale haemorrhaging of Marine Technical and Communications sailors since their inception. Including me; the three years I spent aboard Warramunga were more frustrating and painful than the previous twenty combined.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Similar Threads

  1. Metric Vs Imperial
    By Peter G in forum WOODWORK - GENERAL
    Replies: 127
    Last Post: 9th June 2019, 11:11 PM
  2. Imperial vs Metric system
    By Steamwhisperer in forum METALWORK FORUM
    Replies: 77
    Last Post: 30th December 2013, 05:36 PM
  3. Metric verses Imperial
    By Islander in forum WOODTURNING - PEN TURNING
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 6th September 2010, 03:09 AM
  4. 260 metric to imperial chart
    By tanii51 in forum THE HERCUS AREA
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 2nd June 2010, 02:50 PM
  5. Metric or Imperial?
    By derekcohen in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWERED
    Replies: 55
    Last Post: 24th May 2004, 04:34 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •