Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Needs Pictures Needs Pictures:  0
Picture(s) thanks Picture(s) thanks:  0
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 20 of 20
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    In the shed, Melbourne
    Age
    52
    Posts
    6,883

    Default

    I'm with you now. I prefer the bed/infeed and outfeed move while the motor is stationary. But that is just me.
    I make things, I just take a long time.

    www.brandhouse.net.au

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Age
    2010
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #17
    Join Date
    May 1999
    Location
    Grovedale, Victoria Australia
    Age
    66
    Posts
    3,896

    Default

    I much prefer the fixed bed style thicknesser as I can then have a fixed input and output tables, especially handy for long lengths.

    I then raise or lower the head part to suit.

    Have used the ones where you raise and lower the table and it was frustrating having to muck around with the extension tables all the time.
    Jim Carroll
    One Good Turn Deserves Another. CWS, Vicmarc, Robert Sorby, Woodcut, Tormek, Woodfast
    Are you a registered member? Why not? click here to register. It's free and only takes 37 seconds!

  4. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    17

    Default

    Bingo........exactly my point but I guess you just sayed it more good.

  5. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    1,181

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Carroll View Post
    I much prefer the fixed bed style thicknesser as I can then have a fixed input and output tables, especially handy for long lengths.

    I then raise or lower the head part to suit.

    Have used the ones where you raise and lower the table and it was frustrating having to muck around with the extension tables all the time.
    All good points, and I agree, it is a pain with a moving bed. The only downside is that the market for the fixed bed style thicknessers is a bit limited I think.

    So comes down to personal choices, and deciding what is more important to the way you want to work. Sometimes, somethings are just never perfect. Personally I like the thicknessers where somebody else does the work,

    Keep us posted Bellyup.

    Cheers
    Pops

  6. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    925

    Default

    I have got a carbatec 6 inch jointer and a carbatec 12 inch thicknesser. Both have had plenty of work over many years and for what I do which is mostly mucking about in the shed on weekends and holidays they have been great. Kitchens and bathrooms and house renovations have all passed over the cutters on these two machines.
    My age is still less than my number of posts

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Is a combo jointer/thicknesser a good jointer
    By ClintO in forum GENERAL & SMALL MACHINERY
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11th November 2011, 02:22 PM
  2. Thicknesser or Planer Thicknesser (Jointer)
    By Markw in forum JOINTERS, MOULDERS, THICKNESSERS, ETC
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 9th November 2006, 01:58 PM
  3. Thicknesser or Jointer
    By jess22 in forum JOINTERS, MOULDERS, THICKNESSERS, ETC
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 5th April 2005, 02:53 AM
  4. Jointer v thicknesser
    By jimmyjames in forum JOINTERS, MOULDERS, THICKNESSERS, ETC
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12th July 2004, 11:48 AM
  5. Jointer/thicknesser
    By OBG in forum JOINTERS, MOULDERS, THICKNESSERS, ETC
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 14th December 2003, 04:08 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •