Needs Pictures: 0
Picture(s) thanks: 0
Results 31 to 45 of 45
-
6th April 2014, 10:29 AM #31Hewer of wood
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Location
- Melbourne, Aus.
- Age
- 71
- Posts
- 12,746
Many programs put update checks etc in the startup list so your system gets bloated. msconfig is good for that as posted and some 3rd party programs allow the option of a delayed startup.
To see what processes are running and what they do try http://download.cnet.com/Process-Exp...-10223605.html (beware of unwanted additional downloads from this site though; they'll be listed as options, just be sure to read each dialogue box).Cheers, Ern
-
6th April 2014 10:29 AM # ADSGoogle Adsense Advertisement
- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Age
- 2010
- Posts
- Many
-
6th April 2014, 10:41 AM #32
I downloaded and ran Ccleaner last night - got back an extra Gig on the hard drive - significant on a 32gb drive.
Thanks to all for the various suggestions. Internet speed now continues to be ~ what it should be for ADSL2+.
Pretty certain the problem was with Foxtabs, as previously described. Particularly as it hadn't been working properly anyway.
-
6th April 2014, 10:59 AM #33Hewer of wood
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Location
- Melbourne, Aus.
- Age
- 71
- Posts
- 12,746
Good result.
I have to upgrade the old XP box to Win 7 this week. The first computer I owned cost a grand to add a meg of RAM to. Have just got a 250 gig solid state drive for the upgrade for $179Cheers, Ern
-
6th April 2014, 11:09 AM #34
Yeah, my miserable little 32gb SS drive was $1200 extra in 2007. Early adopter's penalty.I purchased it because I needed as secure a drive as possible for my mortgage broking, and I thought it would be faster to save to (had some whopper Excel sheets). As it turned out, it was about the same save speed as the former 'puta, and I've only just learnt a week or so ago (after 7 years) that saving to the external drive is HEAPS quicker than to the SS drive.
-
6th April 2014, 10:01 PM #35
Perhaps I'm not out of the woods yet....
I was just watching something on iView (using Chrome) and it was back to it's old freeze frame tricks.
Opened the task manager, and Firefox was using about 40% of the CPU (whilst not doing anything) and Chrome was using about 50%:
Shut down FF and that is where the 100% flatline drops a bit. But then Chrome started taking around 80-90% until the film finished which is where you see the biggest drop (about 3/4 of the way through the graph).
Also, when I have two Firefox windows open there is only one firefox.exe, but with only 1 Chrome window open there are no less than FOUR chrome.exe going on (using ~40%, 15%, 15%, 15% of the CPU).
Is that normal?
Tried to do a Speedtest with the film playing, and it just gave up. These days Speedtest comes up with some partnership stuff, and it says my computer is slow (really?). Wants me to down load SpeedMaxPC.
-
7th April 2014, 05:08 AM #36Hewer of wood
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Location
- Melbourne, Aus.
- Age
- 71
- Posts
- 12,746
Each Chrome window is a new episode of the program & prob. each extension too. So it can be a bit of a memory hog. Did you have more than the min. open? Everything else closed?
Any processes running whose purpose you can't ID?
Try running another malware program eg Trend Micro on demand.
How much spare space do you have on the SSD? Enough for an adequate pagefile? Try deleting little used programs and old OS update files.
If it's an XP system it'll have to be upgraded this week anyway.Cheers, Ern
-
7th April 2014, 08:40 AM #37
-
7th April 2014, 09:07 AM #38
Forgot to add that the only other thing running was Outlook.
-
7th April 2014, 09:22 AM #39Hewer of wood
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Location
- Melbourne, Aus.
- Age
- 71
- Posts
- 12,746
ProcessExplorer will give you an idea of what's not needed.
6 gig should be plenty for temp writes but you can safely delete older Win update debris: XP stores its Windows Update uninstall files in the \Windows folder and gives each file following pattern: $NtUninstall{xxx}$Cheers, Ern
-
7th April 2014, 10:22 AM #40
For info: XP on one of my pc has 30 processes running.
63 sounds like an awful lot.
-
7th April 2014, 09:55 PM #41
Did you also run the registry cleaner as well.
I use 2, the one in CC and Auslogics registry cleaner (the free one) there is a lot of garbage left behind even if you have done an uninstall.
I use Revo Uninstaller, click on advanced option, to delete programs, doesn't leave anything behind.The person who never made a mistake never made anything
Cheers
Ray
-
7th April 2014, 10:10 PM #42
-
8th April 2014, 12:29 AM #43
-
8th April 2014, 09:45 AM #44Hewer of wood
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Location
- Melbourne, Aus.
- Age
- 71
- Posts
- 12,746
It has to be said that format c: does wonders
Any Win machine benefits from a fresh installation of the OS and programs and given that MS isn't going to issue patches for XP security vulnerabilities any more, now's the time. Yes, it can be a pain. My Win 7 install went surprisingly well given I was wanting something beyond painting by numbers but the challenge is to get two peripherals running for which there are no Win 7 drivers. There's lots of advice out there on ways to do it, prob. too much in fact: there are five options for the multifunction printer.Cheers, Ern
-
8th April 2014, 10:31 AM #45
I run "TuneUp utilities"
It get rid of a lot of garbage and keeps the registry clean.
Also tells you what is running and allows you to shut things down.
Similar Threads
-
Off Thread: Has your Internet been a bit slow lately?.
By Graziano in forum METALWORK FORUMReplies: 11Last Post: 11th April 2012, 01:43 PM -
Painfully slow
By AlexS in forum FORUMS INFO, HELP, DISCUSSION & FEEDBACKReplies: 59Last Post: 29th December 2008, 10:14 AM -
What Type Of Internet Connection Do You Have?
By echnidna in forum NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH WOODWORKReplies: 39Last Post: 30th May 2006, 01:58 AM -
Too old to remember properly
By Bob Willson in forum NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH WOODWORKReplies: 24Last Post: 11th September 2004, 07:56 PM