Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Needs Pictures Needs Pictures:  0
Picture(s) thanks Picture(s) thanks:  0
Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Mackay Qld
    Posts
    3,466

    Default Digital camera type for welding and oxy cutting?

    Hi Guys,
    If I may be so bold,I would ask a question of you?
    Those of you that know me,will recognize my name name from the metalwork forums.

    My question concerns photographing the oxy cuttin process with a digital camera. I have tried to photograph the lighted torch (flame) with the aged school Sony Mavica camera.

    While the Mavica gives very good results in other close ups ( thats macro isn't it?) - all that I can manage to do is get a rather flared image of the of the flame.

    What I am wanting to do is obtain a clear photo of the flame and the spatial relationship of how close it must be to the plate to be oxy flame cut.

    Naturally ,this is not satisfactory when the flame image is all blurred ,fuzzy and renders no visible image at all, of what I want to display.

    Down the track, at around retirement time or there abouts I will purchase a camera with these capabilities. I wish to produce a DVD or CD to provide for schools,the basics on stick welding, Mig welding and Oxy cutting and brazing /silver soldering. Thats the sort of work I have in mind for such a camera.
    Is some kind soul able to tell the sort of digital camera make and model,that I should be asking for?

    Thanks in anticipation,
    Grahame Collins

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Stratford, New Zealand
    Age
    61
    Posts
    734

    Default

    Tricky.

    The problem is the welding/cutting flame is about 1000 times brighter than surrounding stuff.

    Sorta like trying to take a photo of the sun.

    Only thing I can thing off is to take two pics, one over exposed and one under, then combine them digitally with photoshop. Same idea as with the Lunar eclipse pictures.

    Cheers

    Ian

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Bendigo Victoria
    Age
    80
    Posts
    16,560

    Default

    The problem you are experiencing is overexposure, the camera probably cannot stop down the lens enough and/or set a fast enough shutter speed.

    So what you have to do is cut down the amount of light entering the lens. You can do that by putting a neutral density filter on the lens (ND4 or ND8) or even using a polariser, that will have the effect of an extra 2 f stops.

    Hope that is clear, if not please feel free to ask.

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Port Pirie SA
    Age
    52
    Posts
    6,908

    Default

    Try putting a white back ground behind the flame?(it may help the camera exposure settings)
    ....................................................................

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Mackay Qld
    Posts
    3,466

    Default Can I get by with what I have or not?

    Thanks Gentlemen,
    Please understand that with a camera I am the complete bumbling amateur mumby. I did and still own a Canon 35mm T50 SLR and found it relatively easy to drive ,but these digital doohickeys are a whole new can of worms for me.

    I will try the white background thing.

    I don't think the Sony Mavica can accept another lens ,it appears that it is fixed, or can the other lenses friction fit over the existing one.?

    I suspect what you are really saying that is I will have to go to one of those SLR digital cameras. Ones that take attached lenses as the Canon did. That is no problem.I would expect to use the new camera for near and close up work to illustrate my CD's.
    I expect of course to spend some serious money but as this will illustrate some professional work I am seeking a quality unit. I am expecting to offer the CD,s to most high schools in the country

    I would prefer to be guided by friends here than some sales shark at the camera shop.
    Thanks again
    Grahame

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    3,260

    Default

    Just sticky tape a normal welding filter over the lens as a test.

    Way too much light can throw off the autofocus (not enough edge detail for the autofocus to work on) which could explain the blurryness. You may need to set the focus manually. (A tripod will help).

    Could also be the amount of infra-red light - unlike the human eye, digital cameras are sensitive to infra-red and this could throw it off (focuses at a different point). I think the normal welding filters will cut this down.

    If you are trying to get more of the surrounds in, the easiest way to do it without doing double exposures (which may not work as there may be too much light flare from the flame) is to simply bring in a half dozen 500 watt floodlights and increase the amount of light on the surrounding area. Yes, it will be hot under all those lights, but think of it as pre-heating the weld area! (or do a quick test outside on a sunny day to see if that improves things).


  8. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Mackay Qld
    Posts
    3,466

    Default

    Onya Boys

    You are all plurry geniuses.

    I will give him a try.

    Ta Muchly
    Grahame

  9. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Garvoc VIC AUSTRALIA
    Posts
    11,464

    Default

    wonder how you'd go using a camera with an auto arc welding mask
    Regards, Bob Thomas

    www.wombatsawmill.com

  10. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Sydney,Australia
    Posts
    3,157

    Default

    You may also find that the digital sensor has a problem with bright point light sources - the older cameras alway had a fit when photographing candles, and you got a streak across the image - usually vertical.

    My old Mavica also had focus problems at times as well as the above, the new Sony doesn't (fingers crossed).

    If you are going to buy a new camera for a specific purpose & its a fair bit of $$$, see if you can 'borrow' a demo model (on 'deposit')from the retailer or importer to test - assurances from sales men change with the wind, and they will be reluctant to put anything in writing.

  11. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Tallahassee FL USA
    Age
    82
    Posts
    4,650

    Default

    The "film" for digital cameras is so cheap, you can afford to experiment a lot. Use a tripod for support, so you can combine pics as Ian suggests.

    With arc welding, you may need to use full manual mode for exposures anyway. High electromagnetic fields can drive the camera's exposure circuitry nuts. Years ago (before digital), I took some pics in the generator room at Hoover Dam in Arizona; the needle wouldn't stand still. Pics came out OK, though.

    Joe
    Of course truth is stranger than fiction.
    Fiction has to make sense. - Mark Twain

  12. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Stratford, New Zealand
    Age
    61
    Posts
    734

    Default

    Yup, whatever you end up with make sure it has full manual controls for exposure and focus, and a decent optical zoom so you can keep the camera away from the smoke and sparks. Most of the cheaper digicams just have auto settings and wont know what to make of the lighting in a welding scene.

    I have a Sony H7 camera that would probably do what you want. It's not a SLR, but it does have full manual settings option for everything. Means you can deliberatly under or over expose shots to highlight what you need to see.

    The idea of welding under a couple of 500w floods would probably help too.

    Here are a few pics to show what I mean. Not having a welder here in the lounge I used a halogen desk lamp as a subject.

    Number 1 is the little desk lamp, just shot on auto. The lamp itself is totally overexposed as you would expect. F2.7, ISO 320, 1/40 sec was what the auto mode decided on.

    2nd is the same sceen with manual settings F4, ISO 100, 1/2500 sec set manually.

    3rd is a crop of the 2nd pic to show the detail.

    4th pic is getting up close and personal with the lamp, just on auto again.

    With a full auto camera shot one is all you are going to get.

    Cheers

    Ian

Similar Threads

  1. Who has an oxy cutting torch ?
    By Grahame Collins in forum METALWORK FORUM
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 18th October 2007, 02:58 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •