Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Needs Pictures Needs Pictures:  0
Picture(s) thanks Picture(s) thanks:  0
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 34 of 34
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Deniliquin - Southern Riverina
    Posts
    313

    Default

    Hi Ian
    No you're not being blunt. You're just reflecting the slightly confused tone of what I am asking. Rockwell's information is worth its weight in gold. It speaks in the clear, no-nonsense tones I like very much.

    I have absorbed too much guff from various sources about point and shoot, vs 35mm, vs DSLR, and started this thread in hopes of clarifying my priorities and future needs.

    I did heard that the modern DLSR lenses leave the old ones for dead, in terms of weight alone, and in many cases, optics. But that information was only sketchy, and too often reflected the sales pitch that so many people give you, when their ego is involved. It's very much like trying to talk about cars rationally with many people.

    People have often attached their ownership of things to their self image and ego. Rockwell mentions this, and it is a refreshing caveat to making decisions based on the wrong criteria.

    Again, Ian, many thanks for your input. You've brought me closer to the place I want to be.

    Cheers
    LiliB

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #32
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Deniliquin - Southern Riverina
    Posts
    313

    Default

    Hi Master Splinter

    Thank you so much for the reference to the reading on colour management and calibration. My science/maths skills are fairly weak, being History and English literature trained, and this limits my grasp of many of the more technical issues to do with subjects.

    It's a limitation I just have to live with, it having arisen from the type of education system I came out of. However, even with my weaknesses, I grasped the fundamentals of colour management, and how colour reproduction differs in the various sources it comes from as well as the range of perceptual aspects of the viewer. I also realize that colour management is going to be a compromise, to some degree, related to the gamut of the device being used.

    I know my printer should be able to do justice to a reasonable range of colour situations, being an 8 cartridge machine with cymkgr. I wasn't aware of how much the colour profile is affected by the print media, and I must confess, I don't always use Canon Paper. I do use Canon cartridges, and would not consider any others, so that wouldn't be an issue. Using Canon papers, with correct calibration of my monitor, may well fix some of the problems with print accuracy. If not, I may have to investigate finding a more suitable colour profile for the i9950.

    At least, now I understand some of the aspects that come into the printing process, and what sort of clipping of colour goes on, and why.

    Thanks again.

    Cheers
    LiliB

  4. #33
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Deniliquin - Southern Riverina
    Posts
    313

    Default

    Hi everyone
    I bit the bullet yesterday and bought a Nikon D90 with 18-200VRII lens. The package cost me $2275, so it's not that much more than the initial budget I set myself.

    I did a mountain of reading of reviews on both the camera and the lens, and I think the lens is a good all round performer. Apparently quite a few people stick with just this lens for most situations, so it means no need to change lenses constantly.

    I think the only thing I'll need to get some time in the future is a macro lens, and I'll be set.

    The camera won't be here until next week, so I'll have to be patient and excited for a few days.

    LiliB

  5. #34
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    27,796

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LiliB View Post
    Hi everyone
    I bit the bullet yesterday and bought a Nikon D90 with 18-200VRII lens. The package cost me $2275, so it's not that much more than the initial budget I set myself.

    I did a mountain of reading of reviews on both the camera and the lens, and I think the lens is a good all round performer. Apparently quite a few people stick with just this lens for most situations, so it means no need to change lenses constantly.

    I think the only thing I'll need to get some time in the future is a macro lens, and I'll be set.

    The camera won't be here until next week, so I'll have to be patient and excited for a few days.

    LiliB
    Whoo Hoo - I always like it when peoples get nu goodies!

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Similar Threads

  1. Digital DSLR comparisons
    By pellcorp in forum PHOTOGRAPHY
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 27th February 2010, 09:13 PM
  2. New DSLR camera
    By Harry72 in forum NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH WOODWORK
    Replies: 54
    Last Post: 2nd October 2006, 10:43 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •