Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Needs Pictures: 0
Picture(s) thanks: 0
Results 16 to 27 of 27
Thread: sharpening stone properties?
-
30th November 2007, 09:05 AM #16"Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so."
- Douglas Adams
-
30th November 2007 09:05 AM # ADSGoogle Adsense Advertisement
- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Age
- 2010
- Posts
- Many
-
30th November 2007, 10:28 AM #17SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
- Nicholls ACT
- Posts
- 728
-
30th November 2007, 06:19 PM #18Senior Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
- Finland
- Posts
- 360
Thanks Pusser, what a relief .
I have decided to improve my lingo hard way, I do not have extra time to attend some classes. And anyway I like to talk with real people about woodworking. By hopping into some native environment and trying to manage there, I wish I would improve my small talk routines. It's a bit tough but refreshing, too. I do not mind to get a bit bruised during the learning experience, for me this is the fastest and most effective way to get in.
This morning I found a piece of thick steel I could use as a mold frame. There is enough of it to make a piston, too. I yet need to find some suitable bottom plate as well, so it seems to be that soon I have a new compression mold .
kippis,
sumu
-
13th December 2007, 11:34 PM #19Senior Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
- Finland
- Posts
- 360
updates...
Hello,
Things have progressed pretty slowly, but now I have finished the mold and lid.
I was talking with my pal here and he was also interested in taking part of the effort. The original plan changed such that there is now a compression mold having cavity of 330mm x 195mm x 40 mm, and lid with a 16mm deep piston.
The design is aimed to produce one or two stone billets per day, but large-sized product makes two or three separate stones when cutted in half with a wet diamond tile cutter.
It is a cheap mold, made from scrap steel. These kind of molds do not take high pressures, and are not suitable for molding something easily flowing. The structure of the mold has multitude of division surfaces, so pressure will leak out with those materials. But now, when the compound is very stff and not practically flowing but only compacting, it will work. I iterated that I should not exceed mold pressures of 25 MPa, otherwise it would collapse and deform too much. I think that need about 5-15, so it should be good. My shop press is now too weak, so it's used with a 50 ton hydraulic shop press.
It has dismountable frame attached to bottom plate with countersunk bolts. I can dismantle the frame around the product to ensure it's safe removal off the mold. I would guess it's enough if I take off two or three sides of the frame.
The lid has a deck plate and a piston plate, fitting snugly in the frame.
There is a couple of features I would like to highlight. At first, there is extra threaded holes in the edges of the lid deck. The lid will be hard to remove without some kind of method to pull it up, so I ended up using the simplest alternative there is, which are pulling bolts. Supported against the mold frame they should be powerful enough to pull the lid off the mold even when some material had been found it's way between the frame and the piston. I could start opening the mold by dismantling the frame from the mold bottom plate directly, but I think it might be more convenient if the lid is readily removed off the way.
The other feature is in the piston itself. There is four teflon ejectors providing some extra assistance if the piece gets stuck at the piston surface. The cavity bottom will have a release film, but after playing with bringing compound into mold with different methods, I found out that closing the mold might work better if I used just liquid releasing agent preapplied on the piston surface. But if the release agent fails but only some, there is still a change to get the stone off the lid in one piece. The ejectors work in a very simple way, there is just headless allen screws behind the teflon discs.
The mold needs an insert plate or two to reduce the depth of the mold.
In that condition, it makes a billet of 24mm of minimum thickness. I was thinking that about 15mm thickness would be adequate at first, but if things go well and also if I get some more of the powder ceramics of different types, thicker stones would be done, too.
I am going to try out making shaped stones. At first there would be a plastic insert plate (made of POM, for example) where I could mill some hollows and rounds with a router. Might work, don't know yet.
I do not know now, but after reading Jake's article of sharpening blades of moulding planes, it seems to be difficult to do such a thing with just one shaped stone. You would need at least two for different projections, to overcome the clearance problem for sufficient bevel formation. Simpler shapes can be sharpened with one designated stone you can make by yourself.
I'll keep you updated. The aluminium stirrer and it's working parameters in compound making are next in line.
kippis,
sumu
-
14th December 2007, 01:39 PM #20
Looks like you're getting veru serious about this stuff sumu. When you get some serious product happening you're more than welcome to ship some to me for 'review' if you like
"Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so."
- Douglas Adams
-
14th December 2007, 09:32 PM #21Senior Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
- Finland
- Posts
- 360
Hello kman,
"If p then q", said the old mathematician when standing in queue to the toilet .
There seems to be quite a line of guys hereabouts intending to have some, so right now I really can't promise anything, sorry .
I placed a request to some ceramics suppliers to get some finer and classified abrasive powders. They are making these materials all the time with large air classifier equipment, and the quality is uniform. I wish to receive at least alpha-aluminas of different sizes. I went for 5-15 kilo sample bags.
Anyway, it's just a good start so far. But it seems to get a bit hairy to receive uniform dispersion and compaction for highly filled resin-powder compounds. According to the test compounding experiments, a single impeller mixer providing not much shear is capable to make a dispersion only up to some preliminary level. Premixing this way helps there that the powder dust does not especially puff away that much, but it seems to be that from now on, it must be continued with some other feasible method.
There is so many types of resins, too. I start to think this is going to a bit artistic, so to speak .
kippis,
sumu
-
15th December 2007, 09:23 AM #22"Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so."
- Douglas Adams
-
15th December 2007, 11:11 AM #23Senior Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
- Finland
- Posts
- 360
-
20th December 2007, 08:45 AM #24Senior Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
- Finland
- Posts
- 360
updeets...
Right.
I had a chance to make one trial compound today after hours at work. It did not went too well product-wise, but I had some good experiences to be shared.
One thing is now certain: apply any plain metallic mixing head in the powder-resin compound and it will stain the compound right away. The result resembles badly faked Carrara marble .
Kman, first of all I'm sorry I do not have pics on the aluminium mixer head, nor Clinton1's suggestion to make a mixer using the compound itself, that one broke down after a few turns, also the coating did not attach the walls properly but flaked off. That was my bad, the primer layer did not work too well.
About the mixing trial: I really did precise calculations for the different vol% ratios for this one trial. I decided to go for higher epoxy ratio to get more better flowing compound, just to see how it would work out. I thought I could return back to original higher fill rate compound after seeing this.
I started with 20 vol% of epoxy resin, and mixed that for a while. There appeared kinda smaller spherical epoxy-alumina clusters within more powderous phase at first, in the same way as in those previous tests. Then I went for 30%, the cluster amount increased and also the maximum size increased, but there were still seemingly powder phase left. It did not dust anymore, so I could do the mixing without lid.
Ok, adding 40 vol% made quite big clusters about the size of finger tip, but still freely rolling in the container and following the impeller rotation. I added 50 vol% and suddenly the cluster spheres consolidated together in a one big heavy chunk banging around in a container, and starting to sweat epoxy.
It's quite a wild feeling, to hold a 4 liter container freehand wherein bounces around about 2,5 kilos of compound trying to follow a mixer head rotating 350 rpm, all this powered by a serious post drill. Ok, time to stop this stage .
It formed a big and really stiff chunk of compound I had to take out to the worktable over a plastic film. The compound looked quite bad, there were dark stains all over the chunk when I parted it into pieces. It also sweated epoxy where ever in it I pushed my finger, making the fingerprint moist.
When the impeller had started to spank the chunk around, it finally started to densify it, too. As long as there had been some drier powder portion in the container, it gathered kinda filler-rich release layer on top of the clusters and they "flowed" and followed the rotating mixer. But when it ran out due to just suddenly added-up extra epoxy, it all clogged together. Then the impeller really had a chance to beat the epoxy out of it.
Now when it was a big chunk parted into smaller but as stiff chunks, there were no way how to dissolve those to get some workable dough. With some time it would have been possible, but epoxy was coming to the end of pot life and I had to chop them in as small pieces as I could and stuff them in the mold.
I closed the mold and placed it between heated (100C) plates of hydraulic press, gave 10 tons of squeeze and watched when a lot (but not even the most of ) excess resin just spilled out, carrying some alumina powder making it white. Well, it stopped when starting gelling, and I waited when the resin seemed to be cured, and took the mold off.
Like said, it was proven that this mold does not suit with too liquid phases. Also what was proven that despite one may think that when excess epoxy flows out, it would not homogenize the stuff too and join pieces of compound together seamlessy. First of all, all excess epoxy does not leave the mold. 2nd, no composite homongenizes in a mold only under compression, it really has to be mixed in a evenly distributed dispersion before compacting it.
These lower and higher fill rate regions can be easily seen from the product. The epoxy rich regions are also more shrunken, making stone surface pitted and dimpled. Those can be worked out by intensive truing, but it'll be a serious bout.
What also happened was that the release film attached with these regions very hard. I used this thin polyimide film because it had very nice surface. There probably is a worse choice, but not much, I believe . Despite is takes almost 400C heat, it seems to like cured epoxy resins quite much.
I do not know how much there is porosity in a cured stone, but I would think not much. The density implies to about 54 vol% of alumina, 46vol% epoxy. But like seen in the (lousy) pictures, it has fangs and taste for both carbon steel and chrome-vanadium alloyed tool steel.
The stripes are again just single pulls per each, and when I get those surfaces trued, I would think they'll be quite effective. The powder is just 0,9 micron sized, and it makes that special minor slurry with both water and cutting oil. It polishes aggressively although not so soft any more, and you can now also push the edge.
According to The Order of Sharpening, these would do well as the second last stones, preparing the way for 0,5micron or smaller particles for razors.
For DIY home compounding, my guesses at the moment are as follows:
If wished to make harder stone with more resin, start to mix powder to larger amount of epoxy, adding powder gradually up to 40...60 vol%. I have not tried it yet, but I believe that could be done just like people make bread dough. It could turn out that you could really make it as kinda thick dough, and with the aid of spacer rails for even thickness layer, you could use rolling pin or some round smooth tube (plastic film in between) and roll the dough on some smooth surface treated with a release agent. No need for actual compression mold, really, just some kind of open frame to be filled with thick compound and rolled flat and cured. Could work, I'm going to try it out anyway.
If wanted to make softer stone with less resin, mix it with power mixer (maybe with a plastic-coated impeller in a plastic container) and add the resin a bit by bit. You'll get compound resembling almost powder but without dust puffing. Here you would need a real compression mold.
For both purposes, you need to prepare premixed resin-hardener system where pot life at room temperature is long, at least hours. All kinds of mechanical or hand mixing methods will bring heat into compounding process and therefore shorten the potlife.
Basically you can use any chemically inert enough ceramic powder you want, it just needs to be dry enough (enough free of water), too.
Fellas, this is getting too interesting .
kippis,
sumuLast edited by sumu; 20th December 2007 at 09:46 AM. Reason: Added some refined thoughts
-
20th August 2008, 09:54 PM #25Senior Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
- Finland
- Posts
- 360
Hello,
Time to get this issue updated. (BTW, one (or actually two) of the fine grit alumina stones is about to set sails towards Oz. )
Here is a couple of pics about soapstone-epoxy stones I made. I got a bag of soapstone powder. Had to play with it, of course . The main reason why I made these was to practice mold filling and compacting. These are now pretty good in uniform quality.
These are containing 35 vol% of epoxy and 65 vol% of soapstone powder, making them kinda softish dense and slippery. They are not that effective as the previously presented fine alumina stone is, but are a bit better than natural soapstone is.
The other soapstone has seen some use, the other is not used. These work reasonably with hardened carbon steels and give adequate edge in the end, but are much slower than alumina stones. These stones are also clearly waterstones.
I the pics there is also the current state of the previously reported alumina stone (the dirty white one). I have just used it, and the dirty slurry is still on it. The higher and not so uniformly dispersed epoxy content tends to make it clog a bit, but the surface can be easily renewed with wiping it with mild acidic solution. I am very happy with it's performance.
*************
I wish to make a wet grinder wheel for my Tormek using soapstone powder. For that I need to finish the wheel mold I have started to work with.
Kippis,
sumu
-
20th August 2008, 10:08 PM #26Senior Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
- Finland
- Posts
- 360
I'll add up a mixing chart. The calculated ratios are based on the values in materials data sheets.
The purpose of that picture is to suggest some kind of preliminary guideline for the mixing ratios of binder and abrasive powder, in this case especially for high density alumina powder and low-density epoxy system (resin and hardener were mixed before epoxy mixing with alumina). Weight ratios will of course differ if for example alumina is replaced with lower density silicon carbide.
Also that particular epoxy system is by no means any essentially vital choice for binder matrix, not at all. It is just one of the many very low viscosity laminating epoxies having generously long pot life option, so that there is window for compound processing, mold filling, cleaning up the mess etc.
Lower amount of binder means softer stone. Again, stone hardness is yet another matter of taste or application. For me, I have found out for example that 60 micron grit works pretty nicely with 40 vol% of epoxy, 10 micron grit feels good with 30-40 vol% of epoxy and 0.9 micron has been at least interesting with all studied ratios.
Kippis,
sumu
-
20th August 2008, 10:40 PM #27Senior Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
- Finland
- Posts
- 360
For the 3rd post today in this thread: my updated gear, main methods and some footnotes.
In the 1st pic there is a kitchen utensil called Electrolux Assistant. I picked it up from a flea market. It had some timer switch problem which I fixed just by bypassing it. The speed dial switch is working well, and I'm usually running the device from 2/3 to full speed. This mixer takes and processes about 2 kilo batch at a time if the compound stays free flowing, i.e. has not too high resin content.
It has those twin planetary geared rotating eggbeater style mixer heads which have been better than a single eggbeater head with a vertical post drill. The advantage is mainly in two things:
1. The mixing process is faster because those mixer heads are sweeping almost the entire volume of the bowl while orbiting around the center axle. If the compound starts layering on the bowl walls, I can pat the walls from outside and the layer drops back to the beaters.
2. I can cover the entire bowl and mixer head with a transparent plastic film and tie it with a duct tape. The mixer gearbox protrudes a bit above the bowl edges but it does not matter at all, just let it rub against the film while running.
There is downsides as well. The main problem is that the device is not very powerful. It can be used efficiently with such compounds where resin content is less than 40-45 vol%. If you put that much resin that the entire batch consolidates as a one big chunk, this machine does not tackle it anymore. The compound should remain kinda loose and dryish.
A minor problem is that the beaters do not sweep completely against the bottom of the bowl. I need to stop it at least once after a few minutes (when it has stopped to blow dust), take the mixer head off and scoop the bottom of the bowl with a spatula, kinda turn the compound upside down in the bowl (I'm sorry about my bad english). Then I can attach the mixer head and continue mixing.
Mixing stage lasts usually from about 10 minutes for coarse grit to 15 to 25 minutes for fine grit. Mixing itself causes friction which generates heat in the compound, so it is something to look after. Extra heat shortens the pot life of epoxy but makes the resin viscosity a bit lower as well. With slow hardeners there has been no visible problems with this issue.
Another but minor heating problem might arise with longer mixing sessions when the motor heat is warming up the bowl a bit.
Beater wires have worn some during these sessions, although less than I expected. It seems to be that during mixing there forms a densified and pretty ductile layer of compound covering the wire rake sides, and it looks like it protects the beaters up to some point.
In the 2nd pic I have poured the dryish compound in the mold. This compound has 35 vol% of epoxy. The mold has extra spacer plates on the bottom to decrease the cavity volume down to 15 mm slab thickness when the mold is closed and compressed.
In the 3rd pic I have sleeked the compound with that "doctor blade" in the upper corner. It is made of aluminium. Those cutoffs are supporting against mold edges, and I can slide the doctor blade along the mold. Cutoffs give to the blade about 10mm of depth, so there is 6mm compression travel distance left for the piston of the lid.
The doctor blade should sweep the compound layer surface very carefully. Also while sleeking, the blade should be held in vertical position. If it is in angle while sweeping, the compound layer becomes thicker. There should be no high spots anywhere, not even near the mould edges. I learned this hard way.
In the 4th pic I have placed a piece of PET (polyethylene tereftalate, one of the many polyester plastics) transparent film on top of the compound. You can use printer or copying machine transparents. The film is pretty necessary for two things:
1. It is a foolproof release film. It must be used on both sides of the slab, against the mold bottom and against the lid. Now despite PET can adhere with epoxy quite well especially under compression, you can peel it off the slab quite easily. While peeling, it takes along the thin but tough epoxy skin with the very top layer of the stone.
2. If there is small scratches on the mold surfaces, the existence of this film kinda smoothens them. Very small scratches leave no mark on the slab through the PET film.
You still need to wax the entire mold, it helps a lot in keeping it clean. Remember also that waxed steel molds are quite slippery. Some kind of toe reinforced shoes are a must if working with such things.
In the 5th pic there is the finished slab. It can be cutted into suitable sizes with wet diamond wheel table cutter quite easily. Further shaping of these stones can be done with belt sander, just take care there is a decent dust extraction at hand.
Allright, this is where I have ended up so far. Next I am going to make some shaped stones for chisel gouges and molding planes, and the Tormek wheel mold is also waiting to be finished.
kippis,
sumu
Similar Threads
-
How to Sharpen a Plane Blade Part 3: How to sharpen the front side freehanded.
By soatoz in forum JAPANESE HAND TOOLSReplies: 6Last Post: 16th May 2009, 08:46 AM -
How to Sharpen a Plane Blade Part2: How to sharpen the front side.
By soatoz in forum JAPANESE HAND TOOLSReplies: 6Last Post: 24th March 2007, 01:01 PM -
Japanese Natural Waterstone (Oohira Suita) on eBay w/ lots of readings on the subject
By soatoz in forum JAPANESE HAND TOOLSReplies: 11Last Post: 17th February 2007, 11:04 AM -
Chisel sharpening
By mic-d in forum HINTS & TIPSReplies: 3Last Post: 2nd January 2006, 01:19 PM