Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 46 to 53 of 53
  1. #46
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    10,826

    Default

    mathematically/theoretically, any two surfaces moved over each other in parallel will make each other flat.
    No Paul, you need three stones to ensure flat. Two stones just follow the curves of each other.

    You're the mathematician, work it out.

    Regards from Perth

    Derek
    Visit www.inthewoodshop.com for tutorials on constructing handtools, handtool reviews, and my trials and tribulations with furniture builds.

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #47
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Armadale Perth WA
    Age
    55
    Posts
    4,524

    Default

    That would be the case in lapping ... where two surfaces come to conform to each other ... but if the two materials can be made to move in parallel to each other (regardless of the mating surfaces) then any material at the interface that is out of parallel has to be removed. (I'm not sure if that is what is going on in flat honing (Flat honing - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia))

    As I said, it's kinda theoretical ... but I know that two highly wonky oilstones can be rubbed together to get them both flat - so I think it applies in practise also. That's the picture I have in mind when I think of it - the high points of both surfaces coming off first, then increasing flat sections appearing ...

    Cheers,
    Paul

  4. #48
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    McBride BC Canada
    Posts
    3,543

    Default

    Does this not presuppose that you were always rubbing the two stones together in the precisely the same direction?

    I was lapping/flattening rock slabs last summer (fine sand & water). My best results were random orbits of one stone on another. The diamond band saw was clearly "jumpy", leaving +/- 1mm ridges maybe 3cm wide. This is a saw with 8' wheels and a diamond rope for a blade. I can drive my 3/4 ton GMC Suburban through the rock cradle. Right angles, diagonals, offset parallels, the different directions all helped.

  5. #49
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    10,826

    Default

    As I said, it's kinda theoretical ... but I know that two highly wonky oilstones can be rubbed together to get them both flat - so I think it applies in practise also.
    Paul, my mind boggles how you would do this in practice! Let's say that this one should stay in the "Theoretical" file!

    Regards from Perth

    Derek
    Visit www.inthewoodshop.com for tutorials on constructing handtools, handtool reviews, and my trials and tribulations with furniture builds.

  6. #50
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Oberon, NSW
    Age
    63
    Posts
    13,360

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pmcgee View Post
    As I said, it's kinda theoretical ... but I know that two highly wonky oilstones can be rubbed together to get them both flat - so I think it applies in practise also. That's the picture I have in mind when I think of it - the high points of both surfaces coming off first, then increasing flat sections appearing ...
    Dunno about that theory... given that you hand-grind glass lenses by rubbing two flat disks of glass together!
    I may be weird, but I'm saving up to become eccentric.

    - Andy Mc

  7. #51
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Armadale Perth WA
    Age
    55
    Posts
    4,524

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Robson Valley View Post
    Does this not presuppose that you were always rubbing the two stones together in the precisely the same direction?
    RV - you picked up a flaw I realised while I was at work.
    Each line of interface between the two materials - in the axis of motion - would be made parallel to that axis of movement, but it wouldn't guarantee that all the lines across the surface were level across the width.

    Introducing other motions I think solves that issue ... the flat honing link mentions movements like a spirograph drawing.


    Derek ... I only mention it because it was the second method of flattening I ever used ... the first was a foot square piece of limestone paving. And they both worked. So, as a result I've had the theory in the back of my mind for a couple of years that if both surfaces wear at about the same rate, then maybe you can flatten just about anything with just about anything.

    I'll try and do a quick experiment and put it in the blog section - I don't want to steer this conversation off the rails.

    Cheers,
    Paul

    PS - someone I was reading recently said Krenov (or Frid?) wasn't fanatical about flat stones. Some of the oilstones you see make me wonder who by and how these were used.

    honing 002.jpg

    PPS: Ok ... I kinda shutoff the braincells when I started this ... so I'm pleading "up since midnight"
    https://www.woodworkforums.com/blogs/...erimental-932/
    It might lend some weight to my musings ... I'll have another go at it when I can ...

  8. #52
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Melbourne, Aus.
    Age
    71
    Posts
    12,746

    Default

    You have to be obsessive about flatness if you're rehabbing a bench chisel or plane blade.

    To get a good edge the back has to be flattened and polished.

    A poofteenth out on one grit will mean the next has to do more than double the work.
    Cheers, Ern

  9. #53
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    West Chermside
    Posts
    119

    Default Simple Green

    Hi,
    A coarse diamond plate has an additional benifit of being able to be held under a running tap and it really flattens the stone fast when used this way. If you do not want to change to flattening with a diamond plate try a coarser grit like 120g, the resulting fine scratches on the water stone do not hinder its ability to sharpen to the specified grit but may make the metal removal a little faster.

    I flatten my water stones at the end of each sharpening session so they are ready for next time, and if a lot of sharpening is undertaken I will even flatten them during the session. That way there is a fresh exposed cutting surface that is much freer cutting than one that may be clogged with very fine crud due to infrequent flattening.

    Also some wet stones do not like being left in water perminantly and may get fungus and algae growing in the pores of the stone.

    I have noticed that some brands of water stones do not clear the cut metal and crud as well as others. I once tried a bit of dish detergent in the water with very little improvement. Then I read about people in the US using a general purpose cleaner called "Simple Green" as a 50/50 mix in water. I found Bunnings sold it in a trigger spray bottle for around $5. The stones were immediately visibly cleaner and cut far faster with this simple green mix. I have been using it ever since on all sharpening stones, water, diamond and ceramic. I also use about 10 -15% of it in the bath of my Tormek wet stone sharpener. Great stuff, it may help your problem.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Similar Threads

  1. waterstone id
    By robyn2839 in forum WOODWORK - GENERAL
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 26th August 2012, 09:55 AM
  2. Which waterstone?
    By Whit68 in forum SHARPENING
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 24th April 2012, 01:16 PM
  3. Waterstone Advice (yes again!)
    By Sam in forum SHARPENING
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11th July 2010, 10:22 PM
  4. First waterstone
    By Matt88s in forum SHARPENING
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 17th December 2007, 11:10 AM
  5. Waterstone board
    By derekcohen in forum HOMEMADE TOOLS AND JIGS ETC.
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 23rd May 2005, 02:30 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •