Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Needs Pictures: 0
Picture(s) thanks: 0
Results 1 to 5 of 5
-
21st January 2007, 10:12 AM #1
Increased human carbon emissions lead to higher forest growth
some info on carbon absorbtion
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Study/Fluxnet/
Because IPCC and other studies have shown that up to 25 percent of human-made carbon emissions may be taken up and stored by plants for use in respiration and growth, the Kyoto agreement allows nations to take credits towards their emission goals if they maintain or augment forest extent. However, scientists consulting on the Kyoto agreement were reluctant to sanction such credits because no one thoroughly understands the complexities of carbon exchange between the atmosphere and the biosphere. Consequently, scientists do not know if the creation of carbon sinks in the form of increased forests will do anything more than provide a temporary solution to the greenhouse gas problem.
In an effort to better understand carbon fluxes both on regional and worldwide scales, international scientists have created a mechanism to coordinate FLUXNET, a global network of research sites that measure regional carbon, energy and water vapor exchange between terrestrial vegetation and the atmosphere.
Currently the global carbon (C) budget cannot be balanced. The CO2 released by fossil fuel and land-use changes is apparently greater than the amount remaining in the atmosphere and removed by the known sinks (Houghton et al., 1990; Houghton et al., 1992; Sundquist, 1993). The "missing carbon" is estimated to be ~0.23.0 GtC yr1, compared with 5.06.0 GtC yr1 from fossil fuels (Houghton et al., 1990; Houghton et al., 1992), although other estimates range up to ~4.7 GtC yr1 (Sarmiento and Sundquist, 1992). The inability to balance the C budget imposes considerable uncertainty on predictions of future atmospheric CO2 concentrations, possible future climate, and the debate on future C cycle manipulations (Dixon et al., 1994).
Tree Growth in an Atmosphere Enriched in Carbon Dioxide
One of the longest studies of a forest tree species in an atmosphere enriched in carbon dioxide (CO2) suggests that in this environment trees absorb airborne carbon more efficiently and that some of the absorbed carbon ends up being stored in soil around tree roots. The ORNL study examined the response of trees to additional atmospheric CO2) from increased energy production using fossil fuels. Elevated CO2) levels may cause global warming and possibly disruptive climate change.
This study addresses a variety of questions. How do forest trees respond to rising concentrations of atmospheric CO2) from increased fossil fuel combustion, forest burning, and other sources? Do they grow faster? Do their trunks and branches become larger than normal? Are their leaves larger or smaller? Do they grow more efficiently even when deprived of nutrients and water? Will their response to elevated levels of atmospheric CO2) be to absorb and store more carbon from the atmosphere, slowing global warming?
ORNL studies of yellow poplar tree responses to an atmosphere enriched in CO2) have not found the dramatic growth seen in some studies with potted tree seedlings or irrigated and fertilized saplings—the so-called CO2) fertilization effect. The ORNL researchers found an increase in growth efficiency—the amount of stem wood produced per unit leaf area—in the yellow poplars. They observed a doubling of leaf photosynthesis—the use of sunlight to produce carbohydrates that provide energy for tree growth. However, the relative amount of leaf area that was produced was less, and the overall stem mass—the girth of trunk and branches—remained about the same. The additional carbon that was absorbed resulted in increased production of fine roots, rather than wood.
The increased fine-root production, Norby says, suggests that some of the additional carbon in the atmosphere may be eventually absorbed and stored in the soil rather than in trees. Fine roots, he adds, die and decay rapidly, but their residue is an important source of the carbon in soil. The possibility of increased carbon storage in soil is an important focus of DOE's new Terrestrial Carbon Processes Program, which aims at identifying and quantifying natural mechanisms of the terrestrial ecosystems that may affect trends in atmospheric CO2) concentration. Program scientists will develop the scientific understanding needed to model, predict, and quantify the role of terrestrial ecosystems in regulating the balance of global carbon.
It would seem there is subtantial research and evidence that increased carbon emissions lead to increased tree growth, at least 25% and possibly a lot higher.
-
21st January 2007 10:12 AM # ADSGoogle Adsense Advertisement
- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Age
- 2010
- Posts
- Many
-
21st January 2007, 10:22 AM #2
I had oysters, prawns, calamari and mussels for dinner last night.
Increased carbon emissions all morningIf at first you don't succeed, give something else a go. Life is far too short to waste time trying.
-
22nd January 2007, 09:20 AM #3
studdies done on the Cypress Pine plantations at "Howard Springs " in the NT have shown carbon gets deposited the most in heaviy rain fall months ( Nov-Mar ) and the trees ,roots and fallen follage ,release carbon in the very dry conditions at the end of the dry season ,reducing the yearly carbon deposits to 1/2 of the wet season deposit ( this takes into acount "patch work green Burning" ,for fire fule reduction ,a must with 8foot high grass at the end of the wet )
Google "HowardSprings pine plantation "how come a 10mm peg dont fit in a 10mm hole
-
22nd January 2007, 09:47 AM #4
Reeves,
Anyone that keeps aquariums knows about the benefits of increasing co2 on plant growth. Co2 injection systems are quite common with those that want luxuriant plant growth.
Its wonderful how nature has so many checks and balances that if something goes a bit lopsided it has a way of bringing it back to balance.
It would be a great place to live if it wasn't for all those humans.
-
22nd January 2007, 10:00 AM #5Banned
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Location
- Earth, occasionally
- Posts
- 886
Well, just a couple o comments.
1. Put George W in charge of the Carbon budget and there wont be one left to worry about. (Missing C obviously implies Enbron or Haliburton control)
2. This puts a whole new spin on wood whispering. Should it be can you hear the trees phart? And futher, should Yew trees be renamed You trees (or as Jeff Fenech would say Youse trees).
Regards
Pinocchio