Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Needs Pictures Needs Pictures:  0
Picture(s) thanks Picture(s) thanks:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 15
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Seabeck, WA, USA
    Age
    75
    Posts
    211

    Default Moving 160-foot DF Sticks

    From the album of a neighbor ...“Buckshot” Christopher, an 82-year-old retired logger. 160-foot logs hauled on two ton-and-a-half trucks on their way to a saltwater log dump.



    It's 1929 and the logs are a special order for saltwater pilings in deep water.

    The rear rig was kept in neutral and functioned only as a steering trailer.

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Age
    2010
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #2
    Join Date
    May 1999
    Location
    Tooradin,Victoria,Australia
    Age
    73
    Posts
    11,918

    Default

    It's 1929 and the logs are a special order for saltwater pilings in deep water
    .


    Oh Bugger and I thought it was a recent pic!

    And then I remembered that it would be near impossible to do that with a modern vehicle

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    On the Downs, Darling SEQld
    Posts
    1,167

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by
    .

    Oh Bugger and I thought it was a recent pic!

    And then I remembered that it would be near impossible to do that with a modern vehicle
    You're Right ,

    You wouldn't find the Timber
    WELL!! Not here abouts anyway.

    Count

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Over there a bit
    Age
    17
    Posts
    2,511

    Default

    They don't make suspension like that nowadays. :eek:
    Boring signature time again!

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    melbourne
    Age
    68
    Posts
    939

    Default

    To carry that weight they would have added wooden overriders. Its a great photo Bob.

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Perth,Western Australia.
    Posts
    616

    Default

    Very nice picture of people solving problems in the work place.........I can just see todays lawmen and OH&S reps lining up for a piece of the action.

    Macca

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Oxley, Brisbane
    Age
    79
    Posts
    3,041

    Default

    Why aren't the front wheels of the front truck lifting off the ground? :confused:
    Bob Willson
    The term 'grammar nazi' was invented to make people, who don't know their grammar, feel OK about being uneducated.

  9. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    On the Downs, Darling SEQld
    Posts
    1,167

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bob Willson
    Why aren't the front wheels of the front truck lifting off the ground? :confused:
    Bob,

    You know when someone says "You're not going to believe this BUT!"

    There are two 'old' Chev Bulldog Blitzs, not 500mtr from here;
    if you know the old snub nosed trucks;
    which are setup not all that much different to those.

    NO, they don't run in tandam.
    No they don't do wheelies, Nearly, but NO!
    BUT Boy do they load them up to the Gunwales.

    http://www.ebroadcast.com.au/ecars/M...hev1943C8A.jpg

    This is not one of them...........................


    Count

  10. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Oxley, Brisbane
    Age
    79
    Posts
    3,041

    Default

    Yes, but that still doesn't answer the question does it? With all that weight hanging out the back of the truck I would expect the front wheels to lift up at least a bit, but I can't see any movement in the front at all.
    Bob Willson
    The term 'grammar nazi' was invented to make people, who don't know their grammar, feel OK about being uneducated.

  11. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Boyne Island, Queensland
    Age
    51
    Posts
    929

    Default

    Looks like the weight is directly over the rear axel.
    Dan

  12. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Kyabram
    Age
    45
    Posts
    969

    Default

    Bob (not Bomb On Board!)

    If you look at the front truck, you'll see that because of the narow frame the logs are resting on, the logs don't have enough leverage to lift the front wheels.


    Ben.
    Last edited by Ben from Vic.; 1st August 2004 at 07:14 PM. Reason: I must have been typing at the same time as Dan.

  13. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Oxley, Brisbane
    Age
    79
    Posts
    3,041

    Default

    OK, but that frame appears to be mounted behind the rear wheels.
    It's too hard to see, but the frame must be over the wheels else it would HAVE to lift the front
    Bob Willson
    The term 'grammar nazi' was invented to make people, who don't know their grammar, feel OK about being uneducated.

  14. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Kentucky NSW near Tamworth, Australia
    Age
    85
    Posts
    3,737

    Default

    They may have Blue Tack on the front tyres or maybe heavy weights on the front bumber bar.

  15. #14
    Join Date
    May 1999
    Location
    Tooradin,Victoria,Australia
    Age
    73
    Posts
    11,918

    Default

    Bob,

    If you look closely the crossmember is just ( and I mean just) ahead of the rear wheels much like a turntable on semis.

    Load distribution would be fairly well balanced due to the motor gearbox etc at the other end of the truck.

  16. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Kempsey NSW
    Age
    66
    Posts
    1,140

    Default

    Would you believe that the front truck is actually the middle one and there is another 160 foot load sitting on its front bumper,
    that'd keep it down nearly as well as my mother in law sitting on the front bumper. :eek:
    Cheers
    Jim

    "I see dumb peope!"

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •